img

Wechat

Adv search

JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1472-1480.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00147

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic Changes of Fractional Vegetation Cover along the Mainstream of the Tarim River

Guo Hui1,3, Huang Yue1, Li Xiangyi2, Bao Anming1, Song Yang1,3, Meng Fanhao1,3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Urumqi 830011, China;
    2. Cele National Station of Observation & Research for Desert Grassland Ecosystem, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2015-06-17 Revised:2015-10-12 Online:2016-09-20 Published:2016-09-20

Abstract: This paper, by using ground observation data with Landsat TM data and MODIS data, based on upscaling method,employing the modified three-band maximal gradient difference model which reverses vegetation fractional cover, analyzed the spatial-tempo change characters as well as dynamic changes of vegetation fractional cover on the mainstream of the Tarim River during 2000-2013. The result indicated that:(1) The method of upscaling combined with ground observation data, Landsat TM and MODIS data could realize the analysis of vegetation changes of a wide range during long time series, scale conversion error controlled within 4%; (2) The maximum value of vegetation fractional cover appeared in July and August within a year on the mainstream of the river, the annual average vegetation fractional cover changes overall showed a positive trends where the range of vegetation fractional cover between 18.67%-23.67% on the upper reaches, 10.6%-12.44% on the middle reaches, 4.7%-6% on the lower reaches. There was a remarkable increase during 2000-2006 and a small fluctuation during 2006-2013; (3) The fractional vegetation cover on the mainstream had a significant spatial variation. The upper reaches had a highest growth rate, followed by the middle reaches, the lower reaches had a minimum growth rate. The growth rate of upper reaches was 0.37%, the growth rate of the middle reaches was 0.06%, but there is no significant change trend in it, the growth rate of lower reaches wass 0.05%.

Key words: modified three-band maximal gradient difference model, upscaling, vegetation fractional cover, spatial-tempo change characters, Tarim River

CLC Number: