|
|
|
| Effect of Bio-module Sand Barrier on Distribution Characteristics of Soil Microbial in Mobile Dunes |
| Yuan Limin1,2, Gao Yong2, Huang Haiguang1, Yan Denren1, Hu Xiaolong1, Hu Zhijian1 |
1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry Science, Hohhot 010010, China;
2. College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Bio-module sand barrier was a new type sandbag barrier, it had three functions of windbreak and sand fixation, local soil improvement and vegetation establishment at the same time. Different with other sandbag barrier, its external material was jute fibre, sand soil, corn cob and sheep manure were added. To understand the function of local soil improvement of bio-module sand barrier from the angle of soil microorganisms, soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes number distribution in the sand barrier and around soil were determined and studied. The results showed that soil bacteria, fungi, actinomyces and total number of three in bio-module sand barrier reached 2.41×107 cfu·g-1, 4.51×107 cfu·g-1, 1.19×107 cfu·g-1 and 8.11×107 cfu·g-1 respectively, but the control were only 1.56×106 cfu·g-1、3.01×106 cfu·g-1、1.26×106 cfu·g-1 and 5.83×106 cfu·g-1; The microorganisms number of bio-module sand barrier inside soil were higher than bio-module sand barrier coverage below soil, and soil microorganisms of every layer below were higher than no bio-module sand barrier sand dunes significantly; In the range of bio-module sand barrier windward 50 cm to leeward side 50 cm, the order of the total microorganisms number was placement of the barrier>leeward side 20 cm of sand barrier>windward leeward side 20 cm of sand barrier>leeward side 50 cm of sand barrier>windward leeward side 50 cm of sand barrier, the average value of soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes number of this protection zone soil were 19.56, 24.47 and 8.39 times of that in mobile sand dunes. After 5 years of bio-module sand barrier set, three kinds of micro-organisms number of sand barrier inside soil were higher than its surrounding soil that illustrated bio-module sand barriers still existing potential effects on microorganisms of around bio-module sand barriers soil.
|
|
Received: 20 November 2013
Published: 20 January 2015
|
|
|
| [1] 周丹丹,虞毅,胡生荣,等.沙袋沙障凹曲面特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):22-25,80.[2] 袁立敏,高永,虞毅,等.PLA沙障对土壤硬度的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(4):90-94.[3] 赵名彦,丁国栋,罗俊宝,等.浑善达克沙地高速公路沙袋沙障的综合防护效益研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(7):105-109.[4] 李锦荣,孙保平,高永,等.基于空气动力学的沙袋沙障气流场模拟[J].北京理工大学学报,2010,30(6):749-752.[5] 蔡燕飞,廖宗文.土壤微生物生态学研究方法进展[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(2):167-171.[6] 王少昆,赵学勇,张铜会,等.造林对沙地土壤微生物的数量、生物量碳及酶活性的影响[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):529-535.[7] 逄蕾,肖洪浪,谢忠奎,等.砂田不同覆盖方式对土壤微生物组成的影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):351-358.[8] 刘雨,郑粉莉,安韶山.燕沟流域土壤微生物学性质对植被恢复过程的响应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4):824-832.[9] 钱海燕,杨滨娟,黄国勤,等.秸秆还田配施化肥及微生物菌剂对水田土壤酶活性和微生物数量的影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(3):440-445.[10] 刘艳梅,李新荣,何明珠,等.生物土壤结皮对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(3):669-673.[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室.土壤微生物研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985:46-49.[12] 姚槐应,黄昌勇.土壤微生物生态学及其实验技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:62-85.[13] 张伟,陈洪松,王克林,等.桂西北喀斯特洼地土壤有机碳和速效磷的空间变异[J].生态学报,2007,27(12):5168-5175[14] 曹青,吕永康,鲍卫仁,等.玉米芯制备高比表面积活性炭的研究[J].林业化学与工业,2005,25(1):66-68.[15] 易守连,潘丽军,杨培周,等.玉米芯纤维素、半纤维素分离及水解成可发酵性糖初步研究[J].包装与食品机械,2009,27(6):35-40.[16] 邝哲师,黄小光,叶明强,等.利用甜玉米秸秆和玉米芯发酵生产纤维素酶的研究[J].广东饲料,2009,18(2):34-35.[17] 汪方,汪炜.我国秸秆资源开发利用综述[J].资源开发与市场,2008,24(11):1009-1012.[18] 陈家明,余稳稳,吴晖,等.玉米芯的营养成分分析[J].现代食品科技,2012,28(9):1073-1075.[19] Aramillo V J,Detling J K.Small-scale grazing in a semiarid north American grassland. tillering uptake and retranslocation in simulated urine patches[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1992,29:1-8.[20] 刘忠宽,汪诗平,韩建国等.放牧家畜排泄物N转化研究进展[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):775-780.[21] 崔俊涛,窦森,张伟,等.玉米秸秆对土壤微生物性质的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2005,27(4):424-428.[22] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:110-118.[23] 靳正忠,雷加强,徐新文,等.流沙区不同立地条件下防护林土壤微生物多样性分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1430-1436. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
2015, Vol. 35 
