Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2011, Vol. 31 Issue (5): 1215-1220    DOI:
生物土壤与生态     
Physiological and Biochemical Response of Six Cultivars of Hippophae rhamnoides to Drought Stress
TIAN Wei-long1, JIANG Zhi-rong1,2
1.Forestry College of Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2.Gansu Rural Development Research Institute, Lanzhou 730070, China
Download:  PDF (2569KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Photosynthetic rate, leaf water content, critical water saturation deficiecncy, chlorophyll content, malondialdehyde(MDA) content, free proline content, SOD activity, POD activity, and cell membrane permeability of six cultivars of Hippophae rhamnoides, namely LIAOFU 2, LIAOFU 1, Hippophae sinensis, CHENGSE, HUNJIN, QIJI, under drought stress were determined, and drought resistant abilities of the six cultivars of Hippophae rhamnoides were evaluated by making use of membership function. Results show that values of physiological and biochemical indices of the six cultivars are close to each other in the early drought stage, and their change trends are similar with the increase of the stress strength, but there are significant differences among the six cultivars in the severe stress stage. The drought resistance of the six cultivars follows an order: LIAOFU 2>LIAOFU 1>Hippophae sinensis>CHENGSE>HUNJIN>QIJI.
Key words:  Hippophae rhamnoides L.      drought stress      drought resistance      membership function     
Received:  23 December 2010      Published:  20 September 2011
ZTFLH:  Q945.78  
Articles by authors
TIAN Wei-long
JIANG Zhi-rong

Cite this article: 

TIAN Wei-long;JIANG Zhi-rong;. Physiological and Biochemical Response of Six Cultivars of Hippophae rhamnoides to Drought Stress. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2011, 31(5): 1215-1220.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2011/V31/I5/1215

[1]赵存玉,康春凤.河北坝上风蚀沙化地区固沙造林植物种的选择[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(1):63-67.
[2]刘光琇,张威,陈桂琛.西部中国沙棘叶片稳定碳同位素组成的空间特征及其气候意义[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):866-871.
[3]李根前,唐德瑞,赵一庆.沙棘的生物学与生态学特性[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(5):892-897.
[4]刘艳华,宋乃平,王磊.黄土高原地区退耕还林还草模式案例研究——以宁夏原州区为例[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(3):419-424.
[5]张举梅.俄罗斯主要沙棘品种及其生物学特性[J].北方园艺,1998(3,4):74-75.
[6]李隐生,曹来均,王俊刚.甘肃沙区开发中果树资源的应用及良种区划[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(3):263-267.
[7]符亚儒,麻保林,王子玲,等.陕北风沙区4种乡土树种适应干旱环境的特性及利用前景[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):386-390.
[8]鲍超,方创琳.西北干旱区水资源约束城市化进程的定量辨识——以甘肃省武威、张掖市为例[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):704-710.
[9]张掖市林业局.我市沙棘产业化基地建设初具规模[EB/OL].(2008-05-29)[2010-02-20].http://ly.zhangye.gov.cn/stcy/sj/200805/94170.html.
[10]刘冰,赵文智.荒漠绿洲过渡带柽柳和泡泡刺光合作用及水分代谢的生态适应性[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):101-107.
[11]孟函宁.不同沙棘品种光合生理和水分生理特性的研究[D].沈阳农业大学,2007.
[12]华东师范大学生物系植物生理教研组.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1981.
[13]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[14]孙群,胡景江.植物生理学研究技术[M].杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社,2005.
[15]韩蕊莲,李丽霞,梁宗锁.干旱胁迫下沙棘叶片细胞膜透性与渗透调节物质研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(1):23-27.
[16]李维向,刘朝霞,闫伟,等.沙柳优良品系选育的研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):679-684.
[17]贾万利,苗海霞,孙明高,等.6种苗木抗旱性评价指标分析[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,38(2):163-168.
[18]张云,林凡.基于主成分分析的木麻黄抗旱性评价[J].江苏农业科学,2008(5):159-162.
[19]李禄军,蒋志荣,李正平,等.3树种抗旱性的综合评价及其抗旱指标的选取[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):253-254
[20]蒋志荣,梁旭婷,朱恭,等.4树种主要生理指标对模拟水分胁迫的响应[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(3):485-492.
[21]武利玉,苏世平,王蕙.兰州南北两山绿化区植物与植被类型初查[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):564-568.
[22]张培栋,许静,马金宝,等.基于多目标决策模型的封育工程绩效研究——以旱泉沟流域为例[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):920-927.
No Suggested Reading articles found!