| Desert and Desertification |
|
|
|
|
| Study on the Collaborative Windbreak Effect and Optimization Configuration Model of Shelterbelt and Natural Vegetation in an Oasis-desert Ecotone in Junggar Basin |
| XU Man-hou1, LIU Tong1, ZHAO Xin-jun2, ZHANG Wei-bin1 |
1.College of Life Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China;
2.Teacher College, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract An experiment on the collaborative windbreak effect of shelterbelt and natural vegetation was carried out at an oasis-desert ecotone in southern edge of Junggar Basin in Xinjiang, China. Consequently an optimization model of collaborative arrangement was established. Results are as follows:(1)The collaborative action of shelterbelt and natural vegetation can certainly reduce wind speed. For sparse-structure shelterbelt, the collaborative effect is obvious, and the wind speed reduction ratio follows an order of: that in the natural vegetation>between natural vegetation and shelterbelt>exterior of shelterbelts. For dense-structure shelterbelt, the collaborative effect is relative weak under low wind speed, and the wind speed reduction ratio follows an order of: that between natural vegetation and shelterbelt>in natural vegetation > exterior of shelterbelt. (2)The collaborative arrangement model of shelterbelt and natural vegetation shows that there is a significant correlation between the relative wind speed(at 0.5 m and 1.5 m heights)and the crown volume of shelterbelt(V), the breast height area of shelterbelt per unit length(S), the spacing of shelterbelt(Q), the average height of natural vegetation(H), the coverage of natural vegetation(C). Through Matlab 7.0 software programming, an optimal collaborative arrangement model is obtained for the smallest relative wind speed regime. When V=62.1476 m3, S=0.5756 m2/50m, Q=5.5645 m2, H=1.6889 m, and C=0.2878, the collaborative windbreak effect can reach 85.07% at 0.5 m height; When V=62.1476 m3, S=0.5237 m2/50m, Q=5.5645 m2, H=1.8154 m, and C=0.3073, the collaborative windbreak effect can reach 74.67% at 1.5 m height. The optimal collaborative arrangement models under different relative wind speed are predicted by this program.
|
|
Received: 13 January 2012
Published: 20 September 2012
|
|
|
Cite this article:
XU Man-hou, LIU Tong, ZHAO Xin-jun, ZHANG Wei-bin. Study on the Collaborative Windbreak Effect and Optimization Configuration Model of Shelterbelt and Natural Vegetation in an Oasis-desert Ecotone in Junggar Basin. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2012, 32(5): 1224-1232.
URL:
http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/ OR http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V32/I5/1224
|
| [1]牛文元.生态环境脆弱带ECOTONE的基础判定[J].生态学报,1989,9(2):97-105.[2]常学礼,赵爱芬,李胜功.生态脆弱带的尺度与等级特征[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(2):115-119. [3]贺凌云,海米提·依米提,瓦哈甫·哈立克,等.新疆于田景观特征变化的遥感分析[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1027-1030.[4]朱芬萌,安树青,关保华,等.生态交错带及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(7):3032-3042.[5]周洪华,陈亚宁,李卫红.塔里木河下游绿洲-荒漠过渡带植物多样性特征及优势种群分布格局[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(4):688-696.[6]郑田,李卫红,李建贵,等.塔里木河下游绿洲荒漠过渡带群落多样性特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(2):241-247.[7]郑田,李建贵,李卫红,等.塔里木河下游绿洲荒漠过渡带土壤异质性及对植物群落的影响[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(1):128-134.[8]杨玉海,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.干旱区新垦绿洲人工防护林土壤物理特性及其生态意义[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1120-1127.[9]Mirzadinov R A,Kurochkina L Y.Desert ecotones and their classification[J].Problems of Desert Development,1985,12(2):29-36.[10]王涛.干旱区绿洲化、荒漠化研究的进展与趋势[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):1-9.[11]Wernet M P.Particle displacement tracking applied to air flows[C]//Fourth International Conference on Laser Anemometry,Cleveland,OH,1991:327-335.[12] Lee S J,Kim H B.Laboratory measurements of velocity and turbulence field behind porous fences[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1999,80:311-326.[13]王春玲,王鹏.防护林体系空间配置优化系统的研究与应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(4):126-130. [14]李春平,关文彬,范志平,等.农田防护林生态系统结构研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(11):2037-2043.[15]朱教君,姜凤岐,范志平.林带空间配置与布局优化研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(8):1205-1212.[16]王葆芳,赵英铭,王志刚,等.干旱区人工绿洲不同农田防护林模式防护效应及相关性[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(5):707-712.[17]朱志芳,龚固堂,陈俊华,等.防护林体系空间配置研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(6):36-40.[18]王元,周军莉,徐忠.灌草与林带搭配条件下防护效应的数值模拟[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(3):359-362.[19]金文,王元,张玮.防护林搭配灌草条件下的PIV实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(5):600-603.[20]王晶,吕昭智,钱翌,等.新疆准噶尔盆地典型荒漠区不同景观植被对土壤养分的影响[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(6):1367-1373.[21]任雪,褚贵新,王国栋,等.准噶尔盆地南缘绿洲-沙漠过渡带“肥岛”形成过程中土壤颗粒的分形研究[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(2):298-304. [22]周新华,姜凤岐,朱教君.数字图像处理法确定林带疏透度随机误差研究[J].应用生态学报,1991,2(3):193-200.[23]关文彬,李春平,李世锋,等.林带疏透度数字化测度方法的改进及其应用研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):651-657. [24]Bijay T,Michael G A,Donald L R.Microclimate patterns on the leeside of single-row tree windbreaks during different weather conditions in Florida farms:Implications for improved crop production[J].Agroforestry Systems,2010,79(1):111-122.[25]曹新孙.农田防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1983:1-104. [26]赵宗哲.农业防护林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993:83-341. [27] 海春兴,刘宝元,赵烨.土壤湿度和植被盖度对土壤风蚀的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1057-1058.[28]慈龙骏,杨晓晖,张新时.防治荒漠化的“三圈”生态-生产范式机理及其功能[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):1450-1460. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
2012, Vol. 32 
