包兰铁路沙坡头段防护体系前沿栅栏沙丘形态与近地面流场

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00093

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

防护体系前沿阻沙栅栏不仅是维持栅栏沙丘形态、阻挡流沙进入防护带内的重要屏障，还是栅栏沙丘这一独特沙丘类型形成发育的首要条件。形态测定与流场观测表明，在沙坡头铁路防护体系前沿地带，栅栏沙丘迎风坡平均坡度大于天然沙丘，背风坡坡度小于天然沙丘，背风坡水平长度与迎风坡水平长度之比约为0.7，远大于天然沙丘（0.3）。阻沙栅栏显著影响沙丘表面流场，但栅栏缺失或沙埋后栅栏沙丘与天然沙丘表面流场结构具有很大的相似性。沙丘迎风坡剪切风速均沿坡面至丘顶呈先增大、后减小的趋势，但栅栏沙丘迎风坡脚至中上部剪切风速增长速度较快，中上部至丘顶剪切风速迅速降低而且幅度较大，这种变化对栅栏沙丘的成长具有重要意义。

关键词: 栅栏沙丘, 沙丘形态, 近地面流场

Abstract:

Sand blocking fences at the front of the railway protective system in Shapotou section of Baotou-lanzhou Railway are not only the important barriers that obstruct blown sand flow, but also the prime conditions for the formation and development of the special dunes that we defined as fence dunes in this paper. Observations on dune morphology and air flow field indicate that windward slope of the fence dunes is steeper than that of the natural dunes but leeward slope is gentler than that of the natural dunes. The ratio of the horizontal length of leeward slope to windward slope of the fence dunes is about 0.7, much larger than that of the natural dunes (0.3). Sand blocking fences influence the near surface air flow field significantly. However, if the fences are missing or buried by the accumulated sands, the structure of air flow field over the fence dunes will be similar to that over the natural dunes. Changes of shear wind velocities (u*) along the windward slope of these two types of dunes exhibit a similar tendency that increases from the windward slope toe to the middle-upper slope of the dune and then decreases to the dune top. The only difference is that both increase extent of u* from the windward slope toe to the the middle-upper slope of the dune and decrease extent of u* from the middle-upper slope to the dune top on the fence dunes are larger than those on the natural dunes. This difference is significant in development and growth of the fence dunes.

Key words: fence dunes, dune morphology, near surface air flow field

中图分类号:

P931.3

马晓洁，张春来，张加琼，王焕芝，周娜. 包兰铁路沙坡头段防护体系前沿栅栏沙丘形态与近地面流场[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(3): 649-654.

MA Xiao-jie, ZHANG Chun-lai, ZHANG Jia-qiong, WANG Huan-zhi, ZHOU Na. The Morphology and Near Surface Air Flow Field of Fence Dunes at the Front of the Railway Protective System in Shapotou Section of Baotou-Lanzhou Railway[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(3): 649-654.

参考文献

[1]张克存,屈建军,牛清河,等.青藏铁路沿线阻沙栅栏防护机理及其效应分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):16-20.

[2]尤全刚,薛娴,王涛,等.戈壁地区公路防沙措施防沙效应的风洞试验[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):550-557.

[3]凌裕泉,金炯,邹本功,等.栅栏在防止前沿积沙中的作用——以沙坡头地区为例[J].中国沙漠,1984,4(3):16-25.

[4]朱震达,赵兴梁,凌裕泉.治沙工程学[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998.

[5]哈斯,董光荣,王贵勇.腾格里沙漠东南缘沙丘表面气流与坡面形态的关系[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(1):1-5.

[6]张春来,邹学勇,程宏,等.包兰铁路沙坡头段防护体系近地面流场特征[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2006,14(3):1-8.

[7]李建国,屈建军,李芳,等.不同类型防沙堤流场的风洞实验模拟研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):291-299.

[8]屈建军,凌裕泉,井哲帆,等.包兰铁路沙坡头段风沙运动规律及其与防护体系的相互作用[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):530-533.

[9]李金贵.沙坡头地区风况与流沙运动[J].中国沙漠,1988,8(3):41-51.

[10]哈斯.腾格里沙漠东南缘沙丘形态示量特征及其影响因素[J].中国沙漠,1995,15(2):136-142.

[11]哈斯,王贵勇.腾格里沙漠东南缘横向沙丘粒度变化及其与坡面形态的关系[J].中国沙漠,1996,16(2):216-221.

[12]Wiggs G F S,Livingstone I,Thomas D S G,et al.Airflow and roughness characteristics over partially vegetated linear dunes in the southwest Karahari Desert[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1996,21:19-34.

[13]Dong Z,Gao S.Drag coefficients,roughness length and zero-plane displacement height as disturbed by artificial standing vegetation[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2001,49:485-505.

[14]哈斯,王贵勇,董光荣.腾格里沙漠东南缘沙丘迎风坡风速变化的初步研究[J].干旱区地理,1999,22(1):41-45.

[15]李恒鹏,陈广庭,李波.新月形沙丘迎风坡气流加速模拟[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(1):24-27.

[16]李振山.地形起伏对气流速度影响的风洞实验研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(4):75-79.

[17]李桂宣,薄天利.沙丘迎风坡曲率对风速加速因子的影响[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(3):661-664.

[18]钱广强,董治宝,罗万银,等.横向沙丘气流平均速度变化规律的风洞模拟[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):10-17.

[19]张春来,郝青振,邹学勇,等.新月形沙丘迎风坡形态及沉积物对表面气流的响应[J].中国沙漠,1999,29(4):63-67.