汉江上游郧县辽瓦店剖面粒度组成特征及其意义

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00098

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对汉江上游河谷辽瓦店（LWD）剖面的地层特征及粒度分布进行了研究，并与渭河河谷典型风成堆积物对比。结果表明：该剖面中黄土和古土壤的粒度组成以粗粉砂（10～50 μm）为主，频率曲线图、三角图、参数结构散点图等均指示它们具有相同的物质来源，但明显区别于洪水滞流沉积物;其地层序列、宏观特征和粒度分布与渭河河谷全新世黄土-古土壤序列具有良好的可比性。LWD剖面的黄土和古土壤具有风成的基本特性，但其粒度组成比渭河河谷黄土整体偏细，这可能与沙尘暴越过秦岭后强度减弱有关。

关键词: 粒度, 黄土, 辽瓦店, 汉江上游河谷

Abstract:

The Liaowadian profile in the first level river terraces of the upper Hanjiang River valley was surveyed in detail, and then sampled systematically. Profile structure was observed in the field. Grain size distribution was analyzed in laboratory and compared with aeolian deposit in the Weihe River valley. An integration of the results shows that the loess and paleosol (S0) in the LWD profile were composed mainly of coarse silt (10-50 μm), and the loess and paleosol (S0) fall in the same area in the grain frequency curves, grain triangular diagram and grain parameter structure scatter diagram. It suggests that loess and paleosol (S0) have the same material source, but different from those of the slackwater deposits (SWD). They are the same as the Holocene loess-paleosol sequences in the Weihe River valley in stratigraphic structure, macroscopic characteristics and grain-size distribution. It indicates that the loess and paleosol (S0) from the LWD profile have aeolian features. Average loess grain size of the LWD profile is more finer than those in the Weihe River valley because dust storm activity decreased after it across the Qinling Mountains.

Key words: grain-size, loess, Liaowadian, the upper Hanjiang River valley

中图分类号:

P531

杨建超，庞奖励，黄春长，查小春，吴帅虎. 汉江上游郧县辽瓦店剖面粒度组成特征及其意义[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(3): 682-687.

YANG Jian-chao, PANG Jiang-li, HUANG Chun-chang, ZHA Xiao-chun, WU Shuai-hu. Grain-size Distribution and its Significance in Liaowadian Profile in the Upper Hanjiang River Valley, China[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(3): 682-687.

参考文献

[1]刘东生,卢演俦,郑洪汉.黄土与环境[M].北京:科学出版社,1985:1-336.

[2]孙建中.黄土学[M].香港:香港考古学会出版社,2005:19-185.

[3]Huang C C,Pang J L,Chen S E,et al. Holocene dust accumulation and the formation of policyclic cinnamon soils in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2003,28(12):1259-1270.

[4]黄培华,李文森.湖北郧县曲远河口的地貌、第四纪地层和埋藏环境[J].江汉考古,1995,(4):3-86.

[5]雷祥义.秦岭黄土-古土壤发育时的植被与环境[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2000,20(1):73-79.

[6]庞奖励,黄春长,周亚利,等.汉江上游河谷全新世风成黄土及其成壤改造特征[J].地理学报,2011,66:1562-1573.

[7]黄春长,庞奖励,陈宝群,等.渭河流域东周-西周时代环境和水土资源退化及其社会影响[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(4):404-412.

[8]Mayewskia P A,Rohing E E,Stager J C,et al.Holocene climate variability[J].Quaternary Research,2004,62(3):243-255.

[9]湖北省文物局.湖北省南水北调工程重要考古发现2[M].北京:文物出版社,2010.

[10]李中轩,朱诚,张广胜,等.湖北辽瓦店遗址地层记录的环境变迁与人类活动的关系研究[J].第四纪研究,2008,28(6):1145-1159.

[11]鹿化煜,安芷生.黄土高原黄土粒度组成的古气候意义[J].中国科学(D辑),1998,28(3):278-283.

[12]毛龙江,莫多闻,周昆叔,等.澧阳平原晚冰期短尺度气候变化的风成沉积物稀土元素和粒度记录[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(2): 267-272.

[13]汪海斌,陈发虎,张家武.黄土高原西部地区黄土粒度的环境指示意义[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(2):21-25.

[14]孙东怀,鹿化煜,David R,等.中国黄土粒度的双峰分布及其古气候意义[J].沉积学报,2000.18(3):327-334.

[15]贾耀峰,庞奖励.关中盆地东部全新世剖面粒度组成与气候变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):153-155.

[16]陈宝群,黄春长,李平华.陕西扶风黄土台塬全新世成壤环境变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):149-152.

[17]牛光明,强明瑞,宋磊,等.5000 a来柴达木盆地东南缘风成沉积记录的冬季风演化[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1031-1039.

[18]Ding Z L,Sun J M,Liu D S. A sedimentological proxy indicator linking changes in loess and deserts in the Quaternary[J].Science in China(Series D),1999,42(2):146-152.

[19]王丽娟,庞奖励,黄春长,等.甜水沟全新世黄土-古土壤序列风化程度及意义[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(3):379-384.

[20]丁敏,庞奖励,黄春长,等.关中东部全新世黄土-古土壤序列常量元素地球化学特性研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):862-867.

[21]任明达.现代沉积环境概论[M].北京:科学出版社,1981:9-13.

[22]何忠,黄春长,周杰,等.淮河上游全新世黄土及其沉积动力系统研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):816-823.

[23]成都地质学院陕北队.沉积岩(物)粒订分析及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1976:31-127.