不同类型防护林中樟子松的构型特征分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 影响植物枝系构型的因素有各级分枝长度、各级分枝角度、枝径比、逐步分枝率和总体分枝率等。采用枝系构型的理论和方法,对甘肃民勤不同类型防护林中樟子松的分枝构型特征进行研究。结果表明：①不同类型防护林中的樟子松分枝格局有较大的差异,主要表现在分枝长度、分枝率等变化明显;②不同类型防护林中樟子松在不同部位处的分枝格局也存在一定的差异性,劣势类型Ⅰ的中下部枝条占优势,优势类型Ⅱ、中间类型Ⅲ以中上部枝条占优势,而劣势类型Ⅰ的基部分枝角度大于其他两种类型的;③优势类型防护林中樟子松在距地面不同高度处的分枝长度、分枝角度随高度呈规律性变化,在不同高度处的枝系构型指标以中上部占优势,基部较弱;④通过分枝构型特征研究认为在干旱区营造樟子松防护林以杨树和樟子松株间混交效果较好,杨树与樟子松行间混交效果较差,樟子松纯林居中。

关键词: 樟子松, 防护林类型, 枝系构型

Abstract: The factors that influence the branching architectures of plants comprise branch length, branching angle at different branching levels, branch-stem ratio, stepwise bifurcation ratio(SBR) and overall bifurcation ratio(OBR), etc. The branching architecture characters of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in three different shelterbelt types were researched by using the theory of Branching Architecture. The results indicate that: ①There was very significant variation in branching architectures of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica among the three shelterbelt types, especially remarkable in branch length and stepwise bifurcation ratio, etc.; ②There was relatively significant variation in branching architectures at different branching levels of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica among the three shelterbelt types, that is the branches of middle-lower part in typeⅠare dominant, the branches of top-middle part are dominant in typeⅡand type Ⅲ, in addition the branching angle of typeⅠat basal level is larger than the other two types; ③The branch length, branching angle of typeⅡ changed regularly from base to top, all branching architecture parameters of middle and top part are significant than that of the lower part; ④The research results showed that the effect of typeⅡis better, type Ⅲ is middle, and typeⅠis relatively inferior.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica, shelterbelts type, branching architecture

中图分类号:

S727.2

李得禄;廖空太;严子柱;等. 不同类型防护林中樟子松的构型特征分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(1): 113-118.

LI De lu;LIAO Kong tai;YAN Zi zhu;et al.. Analysis on Branching Architectures Characteristics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in Different Shelterbelts[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2008, 28(1): 113-118.

参考文献

[1]陈波,宋永昌,达良俊.木本植物的构型及其在植物生态学研究的进展[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(3):52-56.
[2]何丙辉.银杏构件生物学理论与应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
[3]孙书存,陈灵芝.辽东栎的构型分析[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(5):433-440.
[4]钟章成,曾波.植物生态群落研究进展与趋势[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2001,26(2):230-23.
[5]Sprugel D G,Hinckley T M,Schaap W.The theory and practice of branch autonomy[J].Ann Rev Ecosyst,1991,22:309－334.
[6]张炜银,王伯荪,李鸣光,等.台湾相思林和芒草草丛中薇甘菊枝构件的分枝格局及其生物量[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(3):346－350.
[7]徐莉,王丽,岳明.新疆阜康荒漠红砂种群构件结构与环境因子的灰色关联度分析[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(6):742－748.
[8]张文辉,王延平,刘国彬.独叶草构件生长及其与环境的关系[J].生物多样性,2003,11(2):132－140.
[9]丁雪梅,杨允菲.松嫩平原不同土壤基质条件下羊草种群的构件结构[J].草原与草坪,2003(3):29－32.
[10]杨持,叶波,张惠荣.不同生境条件下羊草构件及羊草无性系分化[J].内蒙古大学学报,1996,27(3):422－426.
[11]黎云祥,刘玉成,钟章成.植物种群生态学中的构件理论[J].生态学杂志,1995,14(6):35－41.
[12]荔克让,孙宏义,张华.干旱荒漠地区沙地樟子松育苗试验研究[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(1):98－101.
[13]王继和,满多清,刘虎俊.樟子松在甘肃干旱区的适应性及发展潜力研究[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(4):390－394.
[14]李爱德,尉秋实,李昌龙,等.干旱区植物引种驯化[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(增4):2-11.
[15]满多清,吴春荣,徐先英,等.腾格里沙漠东南缘荒漠植被盖度月变化特征及生态恢复[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):140-144.
[16]徐先英,丁国栋,王继和.民勤防护林体系基本格局及发展趋势[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(增4):30-34.
[17]赵相健,王孝安.太白红杉分枝格局的可塑性研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(1):0113－0117.
[18]何明珠,王辉,张景光.民勤荒漠植物枝系构型的分类研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(9):1827—1832.
[19]孙书存,陈灵芝.不同生境中辽东栎的构型差异[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):359-364.
[20]何明珠,王辉,张景光.荒漠植物枝系构型影响因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):625-630.
[21]Oohata S,Shidei T.Studies on the branching structure of trees.1.Bifurcation ratio of trees in Horton’s law[J].Jap J Ecol,1971,21:7-14.
[22]Kuppers M.Ecological significance of above ground architectural patterns in woody plants:a question of cost-benefit relationship[J].Trends Ecol Evol,1989,4(12):375-379.
[23]Sprugel D G.The theory and practice of branch autonomy[J].Ann Rev Ecol Syst,1991,22:309－334.