img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 1628-1635.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00059

• 生物与土壤 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤非生物CO2通量对土壤温度的响应

法科宇1, 张宇清1, 刘加彬2, 吴斌1, 秦树高1, 刘振1   

  1. 1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院/宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地生态系统国家定位观测研究站/水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    2. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-04 修回日期:2015-04-07 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 张宇清(Email:zhangyqbjfu@gmail.com)
  • 作者简介:法科宇(1987-),男,辽宁本溪人,博士研究生,主要从事荒漠化防治、界面生态方向研究。Email:fkysparrow@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31170666);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(BJFU-TD2011-04)

Responses of Abiotic Soil CO2 Flux to Soil Temperature in a Semi-arid Region

Fa Keyu1, Zhang Yuqing1, Liu Jiabin2, Wu Bin1, Qin Shugao1, Liu Zhen1   

  1. 1. School of Soil and Water Conservation/Yanchi Ecology Research Station/Key Laboratory of Siol and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating of Education Ministry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2015-03-04 Revised:2015-04-07 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-11-20

摘要: 干旱、半干旱区土壤CO2通量是土壤-大气碳循环的关键过程。尽管近期研究发现,该过程中存在非生物CO2通量部分,但对该通量及其对土壤温度的响应仍不清楚。为此,本研究于2012年5月至2013年4月,在毛乌素沙地西南缘长期定位观测灭活土壤的CO2通量及土壤温度与降雨量。结果显示:土壤非生物CO2通量在2012年5-10月及2013年3-4月基本表现为白天正值,而夜晚负值;其余月份中,其日尺度上变化不大。在观测期内,非生物CO2通量与土壤温度变化率呈直线关系,但决定系数不高。另外,无降雨或小降雨发生时,日尺度上土壤非生物CO2通量与土壤温度存在明显的时间滞后效应,而该效应会被较大的降雨严重干扰。研究结果表明,土壤非生物CO2通量对土壤温度的响应会较易被其他因子(如降雨)干扰,通过土壤温度单因子对它预测,结果可能不够准确。

关键词: 土壤CO2通量, 非生物相关过程, 土壤温度, 降雨

Abstract: Soil CO2 flux in arid and semi-arid regions is a key process to the carbon exchange between soil and atmosphere. Although abiotic part of soil CO2 flux has been observed, our knowledge of it and its responses to soil temperature is much limited. In this study, we sterilized soil and investigated the abiotic soil CO2 flux, and soil temperature and precipitation at the southwestern fringe of the Mu Us Sandyland from May 2012 to April 2013. Abiotic soil CO2 flux was found to exhibit positive values during daytime and negative values during nighttime at the diel scale during May to October in 2012 and March to April in 2013. Moreover, abiotic soil CO2 flux had a linear relationship with rate of change in soil temperature during the observation period, but the determination coefficient was not high. There was a significant time lag between abiotic soil CO2 flux and soil temperature under dry conditions or in small precipitation events. However, this time lag would be interfered temporarily in large precipitation events. The results indicate that the responses of abiotic soil CO2 flux on soil temperature can be significantly interfered by multiple factors(i.e. precipitation). As a result, the result of predicting abiotic soil CO2 flux by soil temperature may be inaccurate.

Key words: soil CO2 flux, abiotic processes, soil temperature, precipitation

中图分类号: