Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2013, Vol. 33 Issue (3): 751-757    DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00108
Biology and Soil     
Comparison on Physiological Characteristics between the Original and Invasive Bromus tectorum Seedings
ZHOU Zhi-bin1,2, ZHANG Yuan-ming1, Liliya Dimeyeva3
1.Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bio-resource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3.Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Herbarium, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
Download:  PDF (2563KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Physiological characteristics of Bromus tectorum seedlings between its original habitat, the Junggar Basin of China, and the invaded habitat, the Great Basin of American, were compared. The results showed that: (1) the photosynthetic indicators of Bromus tectorum from the Great Basin were significantly higher than that from the Junggar Basin. The net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, instantaneous water use efficiency and the maximum net photosynthetic rate of Bromus tectorum presented significant differences between the two habitats (p<0.01), respectively, while the difference in intercellular CO2 concentration and other photosynthetic parameters were not significant (p>0.05); (2) except for quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation (Y(NPQ)), quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation (Y(NO)), and non-photochemical quenching(NPQ), the differences of other chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were not significant (p>0.05); (3) the content of Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b and leaf nitrogen content of Bromus tectorum from the Great Basin were all higher than that from the Junggar Basin, but the differences were not significant (p>0.05). Overall, the physiological characteristics of Bromus tectorum from the Great Basin were superior to those from the Junggar Basin.

Key words:  original region      invasive region      Bromus tectorum      photosynthesis      chlorophyll fluorescence      physiological characteristics     
Received:  12 November 2012      Published:  27 January 2013
ZTFLH:  Q948  

Cite this article: 

ZHOU Zhi-bin1,2, ZHANG Yuan-ming1, Liliya Dimeyeva3. Comparison on Physiological Characteristics between the Original and Invasive Bromus tectorum Seedings. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(3): 751-757.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00108     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2013/V33/I3/751

[1]Elton C S.The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2000.

[2]Mack R N,Simberloff D,Mark L W,et al.Biotic invasions:causes,epidemiology,global consequences,and control[J].Ecological Applications,2000,10(3):689-710.

[3]Pimentel D,Lach L,Zuniga R,et al.Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States[J].BioScience,2000,50(1):53-65.

[4]Hierro J L,Maron J L,Callaway R M.A biogeographical approach to plant invasions:the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range[J].Journal of Ecology,2005,93(1):5-15.

[5]Bartlett E,Novak S J,Mack R N.Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae):differentiation in the eastern United States[J].American Journal of Botany,2002,89(4):602-612.

[6]Swearingen J.WeedUS:database of plants invading natural areas in the United States[M].Washington:USDA,Forest Service Press,2007.

[7]Mahesh K U,Mcllvride D,Turkington R.The Biology of Canadian Weeds:75.Bromus tectorum L[J].Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1986,66(3):689-709.

[8]Prioul J,Chartier P.Partitioning of transfer and carboxylation components of intracellular resistance to photosynthetic CO2 fixation:a critical analysis of the methods used[J].Annals of Botany,1977,41(4):789-800.

[9]Hartmut K.Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents[J].Biochemical Society Transactions,1983,11:591-592.

[10]Corbin J D,D′Antonio C M.Competition between native perennial and exotic annual grasses:implications for an historical invasion[J].Ecology,2004,85(5):1273-1283.

[11]Blossey B,Notzold R.Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants:a hypothesis[J].Journal of Ecology,1995,83(5):887-889.

[12]Callaway R M,Ridenour W M.Novel weapons:invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2004,2(8):436-443.

[13]Zou J,Rogers W E,Siemann E.Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum[J].Biological invasions,2008,10(3):291-302.

[14]Seastedt T R,Callaway R M,Pollock J L,et al.Allelopathy and plant invasions:traditional,congeneric,and bio-geographical approaches[J].Biological Invasions,2008,10(6):875-890.

[15]Thorpe A S ,Thelen G C,Diaconu A,et al.Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community:field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis[J].Journal of Ecology,2009,97(4):641-645.

[16]Hierro J L,Callaway R M.Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion[J].Plant and Soil,2003,256(1):29-39.

[17]DeWalt S J,Denslow J S,Hamrick J.Biomass allocation,growth,and photosynthesis of genotypes from native and introduced ranges of the tropical shrub Clidemia hirta[J].Oecologia,2004,138(4):521-531.

[18]Blumenthal D M,Hufbauer R A.Increased plant size in exotic populations:a common-garden test with 14 invasive species[J].Ecology,2007,88(11):2758-2765.

[19]Th baud C,Simberloff D.Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges?[J].The American Naturalist,2001,157(2):231-236.

[20]Baruch Z,Goldstein G.Leaf construction cost,nutrient concentration,and net CO2 assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii[J].Oecologia,1999,121(2):183-192.

[21]Durand L Z,Goldstein G.Photosynthesis,photoinhibition,and nitrogen use efficiency in native and invasive tree ferns in Hawaii[J].Oecologia,2001,126(3):345-354.

[22]McDowell S C L.Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany,2002,89(9):1431-1438.

[23]Funk J L,Vitousek P M.Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems[J].Nature,2007,446(7139):1079-1081.

[24]Chen Z Y,Peng Z S,Yang J,et al.A mathematical model for describing light-response curves in Nicotiana tabacum L[J].Photosynthetica,2011,49(3):467-471.

[25]陈根云,俞冠路,陈悦,等.光合作用对光和二氧化碳响应的观测方法探讨[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006,32(6):691-696.

[26]徐伟洲,徐炳成,段东平,等.不同水肥条件下白羊草光合生理生态特征研究Ⅰ.光合生理日变化[J].草地学报,2010,18(5):629-635.

[27]Ralph P,Gademann R,Dennison W.In situ seagrass photosynthesis measured using a submersible,pulse-amplitude modulated fluorometer[J].Marine Biology,1998,132(3):367-373.

[28]Ralph P,Macinnis-Ng C,Frankart C.Fluorescence imaging application:effect of leaf age on seagrass photokinetics[J].Aquatic Botany,2005,81(1):69-84.

[29]Papageorgiou G C,Govindjee.Chlorophyll a fluorescence:a signature of photosynthesis,vol.19[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,2004.

[30]张静,张元明.冻融过程对生物结皮中齿肋赤藓叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1479-1487.

[31]张亚娟,谢忠奎,赵学勇,等.水分胁迫对东方百合光合特性,叶绿素荧光参数及干物质积累的影响[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):884-888.

[32]Feng Y L,Fu G L.Nitrogen allocation,partitioning and use efficiency in three invasive plant species in comparison with their native congeners[J].Biological Invasions,2008,10(6):891-902.

[33]Feng Y L,Lei Y B,Wang R F,et al.Evolutionary tradeoffs for nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis versus cell walls in an invasive plant[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2009,106(6):1853.

[34]Andrews M,Sprent J I,Raven J A,et al.Relationships between shoot to root ratio,growth and leaf soluble protein concentration of Pisum sativum,Phaseolus vulgaris and Triticum aestivum under different nutrient deficiencies[J].Plant Cell and Environment-Institutional Subscription,1999,22(8):949-958.

[35]周晓兵,张元明,王莎莎,等.3种荒漠植物幼苗生长和光合生理对氮增加的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):82-89.

No Suggested Reading articles found!