Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2015, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 917-922    DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00089
    
Effects of Phosphorus Application on Morphology and Acid Phosphatase Activity of Caryopteris mongholica
Song Xin, Zhang Dongmei, Zhang Lijing, Hu Xiaowei, Chen Xiaolong, Zhang Yanhui
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems/College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou Univerisity, Lanzhou 730020, China
Download:  PDF (1467KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The experiment used soil to cultivate the plant materials, and then set up 5 different phosphorus levels(P0,0 mg·kg-1;P1,17.5 mg·kg-1;P2,35 mg·kg-1;P3,52.5 mg·kg-1;P4,70 mg·kg-1). Under the different phosphorus levels, we measured Caryopteris mongholica growth morphological parameters, root morphological parameters, biomass and the APase activity. The results indicated that: the plant height, basal diameter, stem width, ground diameter, root length, root volume and root diameter increased at first and then decreased with the P level grown. And all the morphological parameters were biggest under the P1 level. The root shoot ratio, shoot and root dry weight under the P0 level were the biggest in all P levels. The APase activity decreased with the P level grown. There was a negative correlation between the root APase activity and root volume, total average root length, root diameter, root surface area. There was also a negative correlation between the leaf APase activity and plant height, basal diameter, stem width, ground diameter, shoot biomass.

Key words:  phosphorus      Caryopteris mongholica      growth      root      acid phosphatase     
Received:  09 April 2014      Published:  20 July 2015
ZTFLH:  Q945.79  

Cite this article: 

Song Xin, Zhang Dongmei, Zhang Lijing, Hu Xiaowei, Chen Xiaolong, Zhang Yanhui. Effects of Phosphorus Application on Morphology and Acid Phosphatase Activity of Caryopteris mongholica. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(4): 917-922.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00089     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2015/V35/I4/917

[1] 王晓江,李爱平,宁明世,等.生态灌木蒙古莸的生物生态学特性及其经济价值评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006(2):191-194.
[2] 李玉俊,李新荣,杨喜林.芳香植物——蒙古莸的生态生理特性及其栽培技术[J].中国沙漠,1991(3):53-59.
[3] 郭春燕,贺晓,高建平,等.蒙古莸的开花物候与生殖特征[J].西北植物学报,2012,32(10):2040-2046.
[4] 许再富.稀有濒危植物迁地保护的原理与方法[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,1998:174.
[5] 李立芹.植物低磷胁迫适应机制的研究进展[J].生物学通报,2011,46(2):13-16.
[6] 彭正萍,李春俭,门明新.缺磷对不同穗型小麦光合生理特性和产量的影响[J].作物学报,2004,30(8):826-830.
[7] 陈钰,张乃民.植物耐低磷胁迫研究进展[J].山西林业科技,2007(3):24-26,33.
[8] 杨美.甘蓝型油菜根系形态对低磷胁迫的反应及其QTL分析[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
[9] 范曾丽,王三根.缺磷胁迫对不同玉米幼苗生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(3):231-235.
[10] 周建朝,王孝纯,邓艳红,等.磷胁迫对不同基因型甜菜根系形态及根分泌物的影响[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(2):157-161.
[11] 李键,黄锦湖,洪滔,等.低磷胁迫对雷公藤幼苗形态指标及生物量的影响[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2012,20(5):482-488.
[12] 郭安娜,桂仁意,宋瑞生,等.不同磷水平对雷竹幼苗根系形态、酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(19):220-224.
[13] 王树起,韩晓增,李晓慧,等.缺磷胁迫下的大豆根系形态特征研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2010,26(2):192-196.
[14] 赵华,徐芳森,石磊,等.植物根系形态对低磷胁迫应答的研究进展[J].植物学通报,2006,23(4):409-417.
[15] 樊明寿,徐冰,王艳.缺磷条件下玉米根系酸性磷酸酶活性的变化[J].中国农业科技导报,2001(3):33-36.
[16] 梁霞,刘爱琴,马祥庆,等.磷胁迫对不同杉木无性系酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2005(1):54-59.
[17] 黄宇,张海伟,徐芳森.植物酸性磷酸酶的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2008(1):148-154.
[18] 陈永亮,李修岭,周晓燕.低磷胁迫对落叶松幼苗生长及根系酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2006(6):46-50
[19] 马斌,周志宇,张彩萍,等.超旱生灌木根际土壤磷的含量特征[J].草业学报,2005(3):106-110
[20] 谢乾瑾,夏新莉,刘超,等.水分胁迫对不同种源蒙古莸光合特性与生长的影响[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(4):567-573.
[21] 赵一之.蒙古莸的植物区系地理分布研究[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版),1995(2):195-197
[22] 张焕朝.杨树无性系磷营养效率的差异及其机理[D].南京:南京林业大学,1999.
[23] Garcia M,Ascencio J.Root morphology and acid phosphatase activity in tomato plants during development of and recovery from phosphorus stress[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,1992,15(11):2491-2503
[24] 黄智刚.不同施磷量对油菜根系形态和磷吸收的影响[J].广西农学报,2000(3):27-29.
[25] 张炎,崔永利,王讲利,等.不同施磷量对棉花根系形态和磷吸收的影响[J].新疆农业科学,1996(2):82-84.
[26] 张香凝,孙向阳,王保平,等.Larrea tridentata地径、根系及枝相关关系的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(4):35-38,56.
[27] 叶思诚.油茶适应低磷胁迫的根系生理响应[D].中南林业科技大学,2013.
[28] 杨青,张一,周志春,等.异质低磷胁迫下马尾松家系根构型和磷效率的遗传变异[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1226-1235.
[29] 李锋,潘晓华.植物适应缺磷胁迫的根系形态及生理特征研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(5):65-69,76.
[30] 高利平,乌兰巴特尔,樊明寿,等.燕麦根系对缺磷胁迫的适应性反应[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(11):221-223.
[31] 陈磊,王盛锋,刘荣乐,等.不同磷供应水平下小麦根系形态及根际过程的变化特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012(2):324-331.
[32] Duff S M G,Sarath G,Plaxton W C.The role of acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus metabolism[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1994,90(4):791-800.
[33] Yun S J,Kaeppler S M.Induction of maize acid phosphatase activities under phosphorus starvation[J].Plant and Soil,2001,237(1):109-115.
[34] Hewitt E J,Tatham P.Interaction of mineral deficiency and nitrogen source on acid phosphatase activity in leaf extracts[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1960,11(3):367-376.
[35] 徐庆章.小麦叶片酸性磷酸酯酶活性及缺磷对它的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,6:20-23.
[36] Plaxton W C,Tran H T.Metabolic adaptations of phosphate-starved plants[J].Plant Physiology,2011,156(3):1006-1015.
[37] 刘攀道,孙丽莉,陈志坚等.低磷胁迫对柱花草酸性磷酸酶活性及其组成的动态影响[J].热带作物学报,2013,34(7):1340-1346.
[38] Plaxton W C,Carswell M C.Metabolic aspects of the phosphate starvation response in plants[M]//Lerner H R.Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses:From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization.New York,USA:CRC Press,1999:349-372
[39] 谢钰容.马尾松对低磷胁迫的适应机制和磷效率研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2003.
[40] 王庆仁,李继云,李振声等.高效利用土壤磷素的植物营养学研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):417-421.
No Suggested Reading articles found!