Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2015, Vol. 35 Issue (3): 808-813    DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00177
    
A Review of Advances in Payment of Ecological Services Research in Relation to a Catchment
Liu Li1,2, Feng Qi1
1. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Download:  PDF (972KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  In this paper, we reviewed the basic concepts and theories of PES (Payment of Ecological Services) or so-called compensation, summarized the compensation standards, development of compensation methods, outlined compensation principles, policies, measures and other key areas, such as the current problems raised too dependent on government leadership, the focus is not set clearly, compensation range is not clear, legislation does not perfect etc. Also, an outlook on future research should pay attention to the problems and priorities: firstly, to maintain government supervision, while introduce several market-based instruments during the implementation of river basin ecological compensation. Secondly, to distinguish between the use of protective and destructive acts of ecological resources, so as to adopt a flexible approach on the behavior of the corresponding amount of compensation to be adjusted to compensate effectively raise funds, and optimize the compensation of capital sources. Thirdly, given that the characteristics of the eastern and western basin areas varied from population, resources and environment, the compensation should distinguish between "arid or wetland" and "bad water or good water" to take a different focus. In addition, as the implementation of "Ancient Silk Pathway" policy, ecological protection and environmental management has been set to the initial strategy. And the endowment of resources should synthetically take ecological, social and economic factors into account. Fourthly, to strengthen legislation against ecological factors, such as the Soil Protection Act, the Clean Air Act, to fulfill the establishment of a sound legal system, and protection of ecological compensation for effective watershed.
Key words:  river basin      ecological compensation      water rights trading     
Received:  26 August 2014      Published:  20 May 2015
ZTFLH:  F062.2  
Articles by authors
Liu Li
Feng Qi

Cite this article: 

Liu Li, Feng Qi. A Review of Advances in Payment of Ecological Services Research in Relation to a Catchment. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(3): 808-813.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00177     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2015/V35/I3/808

[1] Costanza R.The value of ecosystem services[J].Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1):1-2.
[2] Costanza R.Ecosystem services:multiple classification systems are needed[J].Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2):350-352.
[3] Barton D N.The transferability of benefit transfer:contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica[J].Ecological Economics, 2002, 42(1):147-164.
[4] Russo R O, Candela G.Payment of environmental services in costa rica:evaluating impact and possibilities[J].Tierra Tropical, 2006, 2(2):1-13.
[5] 阮本清, 许凤冉, 张春玲.流域生态补偿研究进展与实践[J].水利学报, 2008, 39(10):1220-1225.
[6] 李爱年, 刘旭芳.对我国生态补偿的立法构想[J].生态环境, 2006, 15(1):194-197.
[7] 吕忠梅.论可持续发展与环境法的更新[J].科技与法律, 2005, (2):111-118.
[8] 曹世雄, 陈军, 高旺盛.生态政策学及其评价方法[J].生态学杂志, 2006, 25(12):1535-1539.
[9] 张志强, 程莉, 尚海洋, 等.流域生态系统补偿机制研究进展[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(20):6543-6552.
[10] Costanza R, Farber S.Introduction to the special issue on the dynamics and value of ecosystem services:integrating economic and ecological perspectives[J].Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3):367-373.
[11] Rapport D, Costanza R, McMichael A.Assessing ecosystem health[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1998, 13(10):397-402.
[12] 周雪玲, 李耀初.国内外流域生态补偿研究进展[J].生态经济, 2010, (1):311-313.
[13] 温家宝.中共中央政治局常委、国务院总理温家宝出席第六次全国环境保护大会并作重要讲话[J].环境科学研究, 2006, 19(3):1-2.
[14] Farley J, Costanza R.Payments for ecosystem services:from local to global[J].Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(11):2060-2068.
[15] 李怀恩, 尚小英, 王媛.流域生态补偿标准计算方法研究进展[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(4):667-672.
[16] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3):454-463.
[17] Venkatachalam L.The contingent valuation method:a review[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(1):89-124.
[18] Xu Z M, Cheng G D, Zhng Z Q, et al.Applying contingent valuation in China to measure the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Ejina region[J].Ecological Economics, 2003, 44(2):345-358.
[19] 陈琳, 欧阳志云, 王效科.条件价值评估法在非市场价值评估中的应用[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(2):610-619.
[20] 张秀娟.基于CVM沙漠化逆转的非市场价值评估--以宁夏盐池县为例[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2012.
[21] Sagoff, M.Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods:a look beyond contingent pricing[J].Ecological Economics, 1998, 24(2):213-230.
[22] Loomis J.Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin:results from a contingent valuation survey[J].Ecological Economics, 2000, 33(1):103-117.
[23] 方和荣.维塞尔边际理论述评[J].厦门大学学报(哲社版), 1994, (3):8-13.
[24] 李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华等.机会成本法在确定生态补偿标准中的应用--以海南中部山区为例[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(9):4875-4883.
[25] 张乐勤, 荣慧芳.条件价值法和机会成本法在小流域生态补偿标准估算中的应用--以安徽省秋浦河为例[J].水土保持通报, 2012, 32(4):158-163.
[26] 郭秀锐, 毛显强, 杨居荣, 等.生态系统健康效果--费用分析方法在广州城市生态规划中的应用[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(5):126-130.
[27] 黄振管.效益费用分析法在评估环保科技效益中的应用[J].环境科学研究, 1994, 7(3):60-63.
[28] 赵雪雁.生态补偿效率研究综述[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(6):1960-1969.
[29] 张平.南水北调工程受水区资源优化配置研究[D].南京:河海大学, 2006.
[30] 张全发, 苏荣辉, 江明喜等.南水北调工程及其生态安全:优先研究领域[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2):217-221.
[31] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋.生态经济学理论方法与应用[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社, 2003.
[32] 方创琳, 鲍超.黑河流域水-生态-经济发展耦合模型及应用[J].地理学报, 2004, 59(5):781-790.
[33] 罗慧, 李良序, 王梅华, 等.水权准市场交易模型及市场均衡分析[J].水利学报, 2006, 37(4):492-498.
[34] 荀彦平.基于生态环境保护目标的西北干旱区城市水权交易机制构建[D].兰州:兰州大学, 2007.
[35] 程艳军.中国流域生态服务补偿模式研究--以浙江省金华江流域为例[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2006.
[36] 尚海洋, 张志强.石羊河流域武威市水资源社会化循环评估[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(7):57-62.
[37] 沈满洪.水权交易制度研究:中国的案例分析[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2004.
[38] 霍艳斌.长三角大气污染物排污权交易一体化研究[J].生态经济, 2012, (12):181-184.
[39] 张培, 章显, 于鲁冀.排污权有偿使用阶梯式定价研究--以化学需氧量排放为例[J].生态经济, 2012, (8):60-62.
[40] 刘晓红, 虞锡君.县域跨界水污染补偿机制在嘉兴市的探索[J].环境污染与防治, 2009, 31(4):85-88.
[41] 徐国华.巢湖流域水污染治理的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学, 2002.
[42] 孔亮.太湖流域水污染权配置机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学.2009.
[43] 宋乃平, 张凤荣, 李保国, 等.禁牧政策及其效应解析[J].自然资源学报, 2004, 19(3):316-323.
[44] 徐中民, 李兴文, 赵雪雁, 等.甘肃省典型地区生态补偿机制研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社, 2011.
[45] 杜群.美国以自然资源保护为宗旨的土地休耕经验[J].林业经济, 2008, (5):72-80.
[46] 刘玉卿, 徐中民, 南卓铜.基于SWAT模型和最小数据法的黑河流域上游生态补偿研究[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(10):124-130.
[47] 赵雪雁, 李巍, 王学良.生态补偿研究中的几个关键问题[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(2):1-7.
[48] 张郁, 丁四保.基于主体功能区划的流域生态补偿机制[J].经济地理, 2008, 28(5):849-852.
[49] 宋晓谕, 徐中民, 祁元等.青海湖流域生态补偿空间选择与补偿标准研究[J].冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2):496-503.
[50] 傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6):571-576.
[51] 樊胜岳, 徐裕财, 徐均等.生态建设政策对沙漠化影响的定量分析[J].中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3):889-900.
No Suggested Reading articles found!