Quantitative assessment on the supply-demand balance of carbon sequestration service in artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00029

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 222-232.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00029

Previous Articles Next Articles

Quantitative assessment on the supply-demand balance of carbon sequestration service in artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert

Liwen Yang¹^,²^,³(), Xiaojun Li², Haotian Yang², Zhishan Zhang², Zhuoqun Shi¹, Xiao Qin¹, Dandan Hong⁴, Dayong Wang⁵()

^1.Department of Economics，Shanxi Institute of Energy，Jinzhong 030060，Shanxi，China
^2.Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station，Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Lanzhou 730000
^3.College of Urban and Environmental Sciences，Peking University，Beijing 100871，China
^4.Shanghai Geological & Mineral Engineering Exploration （Group） Co. ，Ltd. ，Shanghai 200436，China
^5.Climate Centre of Shanxi Province，Taiyuan 030006，China

Received:2025-02-11 Revised:2025-04-24 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-06-30
Contact: Dayong Wang

Abstract

Abstract:

To systematically assess the efficacy of ecological restoration initiatives in enhancing carbon sequestration service supply， this study conducted a quantitative analysis of the supply-demand balance of carbon sequestration service across distinct succession stages of artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem in the Shapotou region between 2015 and 2020. Key findings include：（1）The total carbon sequestration service supply within the artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem exhibited a fluctuating upward trend over time， approaching stabilization after 52 years of vegetation restoration. During the initial 17-year restoration phase， shrub biomass dominated carbon sequestration service supply， whereas soil carbon sequestration became the primary contributor between 25-60 years post-restoration. A significant negative correlation was identified between soil and shrub carbon sequestration supply， which was effectively modeled using a regression equation $y = 9.88 - 3.21 l n x$ . Notably， the increasing herbaceous biomass suggests a sustained rise in soil carbon sequestration supply over extended timescales. （2） By 2020， regional carbon sequestration demand surged by 43.33% relative to 2015 level， primarily driven by escalating construction land emissions. This growth was closely linked to the coal-intensive energy structure and heavy industrial development characteristic of the study area. （3） From 2015 to 2020， the per-unit-area supply-demand ratio for carbon sequestration service in Shapotou's artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem remained consistently below 1， reflecting a widening gap between supply and demand. The findings highlighted a critical mismatch where supply growth lagged far behind demand escalation. These insights carry profound implications for achieving carbon neutrality in desert ecosystems and maintaining ecological security. Methodologically， this research provides innovative frameworks for evaluating carbon sequestration effectiveness in sandy land restoration projects， advancing both ecological science and evidence-based policy formulation in arid region management.

Key words: carbon sequestration service, artificial sand-binding vegetation, supply-demand balance, ecological restoration, Shapotou

CLC Number:

S728.4

Liwen Yang, Xiaojun Li, Haotian Yang, Zhishan Zhang, Zhuoqun Shi, Xiao Qin, Dandan Hong, Dayong Wang. Quantitative assessment on the supply-demand balance of carbon sequestration service in artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(3): 222-232.

Figures/Tables 8

References 59

1	傅伯杰，刘焱序，赵文武.“一带一路”生态环境保护和可持续发展科技合作重点领域［J］.中国科学院院刊，2023，38（9）：1273-1281.
2	崔桂鹏，肖春蕾，雷加强，等.大国治理：中国荒漠化防治的战略选择与未来愿景［J］.中国科学院院刊，2023，38（7）：943-955.
3	Li X R， He M Z， Duan Z H，et al.Recovery of topsoil physicochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert，northern China［J］.Geomorphology，2007，88（3/4）：254-265.
4	Li X R， Kong D S， Tan H J，et al.Changes in soil and vegetation following stabilisation of dunes in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert，China［J］.Plant and Soil，2007，300（1）：221-231.
5	于钊，李奇铮，王培源，等.退化和恢复过程驱动的荒漠草地生态系统有机碳密度变化［J］.中国沙漠，2022，42（2）：215-222.
6	Yang H T， Li X R， Wang Z R，et al.Carbon sequestration capacity of shifting sand dune after establishing new vegetation in the Tengger Desert，northern China［J］.Science of the Total Environment，2014（478）：1-11.
7	Chen Y L， Zhang Z S， Zhao Y，et al.Soil carbon storage along a 46-year revegetation chronosequence in a desert area of northern China［J］.Geoderma，2018（325）：28-36.
8	Li X J， Li Y F， Xie T，et al.Recovery of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation with xerophytic shrubs in the Tengger Desert，North China［J］.Catena，2022（214）：106277.
9	国家林业和草原局. 全国防沙治沙规划（2021-2030年）［S］.北京：国家林业和草原局，2023.
10	MA（Millennium Ecosystem Assessment）.Ecosystems and Human Well-Being Synthesis［M］.Washington DC：Island Press，2005.
11	Costanza R.Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency，fairness，and sustainability［J］.Ecosystem Services，2020，43：101096.
12	邴龙飞，王娇月，尹岩，等.地市尺度气候调节服务评估：以福州市为例［J］.应用生态学报，2022，33（7）：1966-1974.
13	孙杰，徐梦佳，刘冬，等.长江三角洲地区生态系统气候调节服务价值空间变化影响机制分析［J］.生态与农村环境学报，2024，40（9）：1121-1133.
14	United Nations，et al.System of environmental-economic accounting ecosystem accounting （SEEA EA）［EB/OL］.［2023-09-18］..
15	Sharp R， Douglass J， Wolny S，et al.InVEST 3.9.2.user's guide［Z］.Stanford，USA：Stanford University，2020：307.
16	Yang G， Su C， Zhang H，et al.Tree-level landscape transitions and changes in carbon storage throughout the mine life cycle［J］.Science of Total Environment，2023，905（12）：166896.
17	Zhao C， Sander H A.Quantifying and mapping the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service from urban trees［J］.PLoS One，2015，10（8）：e0136392.
18	Sahle M， Saito O， Fürst C，et al.Quantification and mapping of the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service in woody biomass and soil to mitigate climate change in the socioecological environment［J］.Science of the Total Environment，2018，624（12）：342-354.
19	Zhu C X， Wei F， Wu X H，et al.Spatial mismatch and the attribution analysis of carbon storage demand and supply in the Yangtze River Economic Belt，China［J］.Journal of Cleaner Production，2024，434：140036.
20	贾晓红，李新荣，周玉燕，等.干旱沙区人工固沙植被演变过程中土壤有机碳氮储量及其分布特征［J］.环境科学，2012，33（3）：938-944.
21	Li Y F， Zhang X， Wang B Y，et al.Revegetation promotes soil ineral-associated organic carbon sequestration and soil carbon stability in the Tengger Desert，northern China［J］.Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2023，185：109155.
22	安立伟，李志刚.退化荒漠草地恢复对土壤有机碳及其驱动因子的影响［J］.生态学报，2024，44（13）：5519-5531.
23	Chen L L， Sun J H， Taogetao B Y.Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks following revegetation in a semi-arid grassland of North China［J］.Journal of Environmental Management，2023，346：118995.
24	Kang X E， Liu T X， Hao L N，et al.Carbon dynamics of the plant-soil system during vegetation succession in dune-meadow cascade ecosystems in Horqin Sandy Land，China［J］.Ecological Indicators，2023，155：110916.
25	Wang A N， Zha T G， Zhang Z Q.Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China［J］.Catena，2023，228：107142.
26	袁壮壮，叶长盛，李辉丹。基于土地利用变化的南昌市碳排放效应分析［J］.湖南师范大学自然科学学报，2021，44（5）：30-39.
27	Li Q X， Yang D F， Jia Z Q，et al.Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks along a chronosequence of Caragana intermedia plantations in alpine sandy land［J］.Ecological Engineering，2019，133：53-59.
28	Huang L， Xu X L， Shao Q，et al.Improving carbon mitigation potential through grassland ecosystem restoration under climatic change in northeastern Tibetan Plateau［J］.Advances in Meteorology，2014，379306：1-11.
29	Zuo X A， Zhang J， Zhou X，et al.Changes in carbon and nitrogen storage along a restoration gradient in a semiarid sandy grassland［J］.Acta Oecologica，2015，69：1-8.
30	Yu Z C， Zhang W， Liu Y S，et al.Dynamics of SOC density and driving factors during the restoration of artificial grassland and abandoned farmland in Mu Us Desert，China［J］.Catena，2023，224：106991.
31	Han X， Gao G， Li Z，et al.Effects of plantation age and precipitation gradient on soil carbon and nitrogen changes following afforestation in the Chinese Loess Plateau［J］.Land Degradation ＆ Development，2019，30（18）：2298-2310.
32	Eggleston H S， Buendia L， Miwa K，et al.IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories［R］.Tokyo，Japan：IGES，2006.
33	张志山，何明珠，谭会娟，等.沙漠人工植被区生物结皮类土壤的蒸发特性：以沙坡头沙漠研究试验站为例［J］.土壤学报，2007，44（3）：404-410.
34	FAO-ISRIC-ISSS.World Reference Base for Soil Resources［M］.Rome，Italy：FAO，1998.
35	杨昊天，李新荣，闫培洁，等.腾格里沙漠土壤类型空间分布特征［J］.中国沙漠，2020，40（4）：154-162.
36	张甜，贾荣亮，高艳红，等.沙坡头人工固沙植被演替过程中主要结皮生物生态位和种间关联变化特征［J］.中国沙漠，2021，41（4）：100-108.
37	李新荣，张志山，谭会娟，等.我国北方风沙危害区生态重建与恢复：腾格里沙漠土壤水分与植被承载力的探讨［J］.中国科学：生命科学，2014，44（3）：257-266.
38	中国科学院资源环境科学数据中心.中国土地利用现状遥感监测数据［EB/OL］.（2021-04-20）［2022-11-10］..
39	中卫市统计局.中卫统计年鉴-2016［Z］.银川：银川市昊博彩色印刷有限公司.2016
40	中卫市统计局.中卫统计年鉴-2021［Z］.银川：银川市昊博彩色印刷有限公司.2021
41	冯杰，张胜，王涛.中国省际土地利用碳排放及其影响因素分析［J］.统计与决策，2019，35（5）：141-145.
42	马远，刘真真.黄河流域土地利用碳排放的时空演变及影响因素研究［J］.生态经济，2021，37（4）：35-43.
43	郑永超，文琦.宁夏自治区土地利用变化及碳排放效应［J］.水土保持研究，2020，27（1）：207-212.
44	孙赫，梁红梅，常学礼，等.中国土地利用碳排放及其空间关联［J］.经济地理，2015，35（3）：154-162.
45	李建强，张飞云，李倩，等.基于PLUS-InVEST模型的新疆土地利用碳排放与碳储量时空演变分析及模拟［J/OL］.农业资源与环境学报，2025..
46	王亚娟，翟晨曦，刘彩玉，等.宁夏土地利用碳排放时空差异及影响因素分析［J］.环境科学，2024（9）：5049-5059.
47	Chai Q L， Ma Z Y， An Q Q，et al.Does Caragana korshinskii plantation increase soil carbon continuously in a water limited landscape on the Loess Plateau，China［J］.Land Degradradation＆Development，2019，30：1691-1698.
48	Li Y Q， Chen Y P， Wang X Y，et al.Improvements in soil carbon and nitrogen capacities after shrub planting to stabilize sand dunes in China's Horqin Sandy Land［J］.Sustainability，2017，9（4）：662.
49	Yang H T， Wang Z， Li X，et al.Vegetation restoration drives the dynamics and distribution of nitrogen and phosphorous pools in a temperate desert soil-plant system［J］.Journal of Environmental Management，2019，245：200-209.
50	Li X R， Tian F， Jia R L，et al.Do biological soil crusts determine vegetation changes in sandy deserts？Implications for managing artificial vegetation［J］.Hydrological Processes，2010，24：3621-3630.
51	陈荷生.干旱区造林与水分平衡的关系［R］.国家“七·五”重点科技攻关项目研究报告（75_08_01-06）.1990.
52	Arnalds O， Orradottir B， Aradottir A L.Carbon accumulation in Icelandic desert Andosols during early stages of restoration［J］.Geoderma，2013，193/194：172-179.
53	Garcia-Franco N， Wiesmeier M， Goberna M，et al.Carbon dynamics after afforestation of semiarid shrublands： implications of site preparation techniques［J］.Forest Ecology and Management，2014，319：107-115.
54	杨静，郭群.省级层面碳排放估算及减排路径方法研究：以宁夏为例［J］.中国沙漠，2023，43（5）：176-185.
55	van Groenigen K J， Six J， Hungate B A，et al.Element interactions limit soil carbon storage［J］.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2006，103（17）：6571-6574.
56	LeBauer D S， Treseder K K.Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed［J］.Ecology，2008，89（2）：371-379.
57	Hoogmoed M， Cunningham S C， Baker P J，et al.Is there more soil carbon under nitrogen-fixing trees than under non-nitrogen-fixing trees in mixed-species restoration plantings？［J］.Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment，2014，188：80-84.
58	Delgado-Baquerizo M， Eldridge D J， Maestre F T，et al.Aridity decouples C∶N∶P stoichiometry across multiple trophic levels in terrestrial ecosystems［J］.Ecosystems，2017，21（3）：459-468.
59	Liu X， Yang T， Wang Q，et al.Dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks after afforestation in arid and semi-arid regions： a meta-analysis［J］.Science of Total Environment，2018，618：1658-1664.

演替阶段（固沙年限）/a	优势物种	土壤有机质 /（g·kg^-1）	土壤容重 /（g·cm^-3）	物种数量 /个	覆盖度/%		地上部生物量/（g·m^-2）		凋落物 /（g·m^-2）
演替阶段（固沙年限）/a	优势物种	土壤有机质 /（g·kg^-1）	土壤容重 /（g·cm^-3）	物种数量 /个	灌丛	草本	灌丛	草本	凋落物 /（g·m^-2）
0	沙米、花棒	0.41±0.07	1.55±0.01	1.4±0.32	0.22±0.12	0.16±0.03	2.14±0.40	0.11±0.02	0
4	油蒿、花棒、柠条	0.43±0.07	1.55±0.01	3.6±0.32	10.7±1.05	1.06±0.17	70.68±6.33	3.10±0.30	1.04±0.20
5	油蒿、花棒、柠条	0.55±0.08	1.54±0.01	3.8±0.26	14.02±0.68	2.30±0.33	85.12±5.99	3.14±0.34	1.19±0.09
17	油蒿、花棒、柠条、小画眉草	0.95±0.03	1.52±0.01	5.6±0.66	28.50±0.69	6.94±0.24	365.29±24.68	16.48±0.78	4.41±0.37
25	油蒿、花棒、雾冰藜、小画眉草	1.65±0.10	1.51±0.01	5.8±0.26	21.76±1.65	11.08±0.83	207.46±17.25	29.18±3.10	5.69±0.30
29	油蒿、花棒、雾冰藜、小画眉草	1.70±0.17	1.49±0.01	7.2±0.48	13.80±1.20	10.98±0.43	170.61±16.58	30.44±4.85	5.70±0.44
35	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	2.27±0.25	1.49±0.02	8.2±0.48	10.68±0.78	14.30±1.06	142.07±14.48	35.09±3.39	8.93±0.83
43	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	3.62±0.39	1.47±0.02	8.6±0.66	7.22±0.39	14.46±0.74	104.93±17.61	43.45±4.58	9.24±0.56
52	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	4.66±0.21	1.43±0.02	9.8±0.48	5.98±0.64	20.36±0.52	91.16±5.7	57.73±2.91	11.29±0.83
60	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	4.83±0.39	1.41±0.02	10.0±0.41	4.50±0.93	23.46±0.73	103.07±7.71	57.43±4.31	11.44±0.67
NV	驼绒藜、油蒿、小画眉草和短花针茅	6.22±0.36	1.20±0.01	15.8±0.75	15.20±0.85	36.42±1.72	160.15±20.18	144.61±13.43	21.49±1.72
F				109.97	117.21	249.59	105.11	62.41	126.24
P				<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

演替阶段（固沙年限）/a	优势物种	土壤有机质 /（g·kg^-1）	土壤容重 /（g·cm^-3）	物种数量 /个	覆盖度/%		地上部生物量/（g·m^-2）		凋落物 /（g·m^-2）
演替阶段（固沙年限）/a	优势物种	土壤有机质 /（g·kg^-1）	土壤容重 /（g·cm^-3）	物种数量 /个	灌丛	草本	灌丛	草本	凋落物 /（g·m^-2）
0	沙米、花棒	0.41±0.07	1.55±0.01	1.4±0.32	0.22±0.12	0.16±0.03	2.14±0.40	0.11±0.02	0
4	油蒿、花棒、柠条	0.43±0.07	1.55±0.01	3.6±0.32	10.7±1.05	1.06±0.17	70.68±6.33	3.10±0.30	1.04±0.20
5	油蒿、花棒、柠条	0.55±0.08	1.54±0.01	3.8±0.26	14.02±0.68	2.30±0.33	85.12±5.99	3.14±0.34	1.19±0.09
17	油蒿、花棒、柠条、小画眉草	0.95±0.03	1.52±0.01	5.6±0.66	28.50±0.69	6.94±0.24	365.29±24.68	16.48±0.78	4.41±0.37
25	油蒿、花棒、雾冰藜、小画眉草	1.65±0.10	1.51±0.01	5.8±0.26	21.76±1.65	11.08±0.83	207.46±17.25	29.18±3.10	5.69±0.30
29	油蒿、花棒、雾冰藜、小画眉草	1.70±0.17	1.49±0.01	7.2±0.48	13.80±1.20	10.98±0.43	170.61±16.58	30.44±4.85	5.70±0.44
35	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	2.27±0.25	1.49±0.02	8.2±0.48	10.68±0.78	14.30±1.06	142.07±14.48	35.09±3.39	8.93±0.83
43	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	3.62±0.39	1.47±0.02	8.6±0.66	7.22±0.39	14.46±0.74	104.93±17.61	43.45±4.58	9.24±0.56
52	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	4.66±0.21	1.43±0.02	9.8±0.48	5.98±0.64	20.36±0.52	91.16±5.7	57.73±2.91	11.29±0.83
60	油蒿、雾冰藜、小画眉草	4.83±0.39	1.41±0.02	10.0±0.41	4.50±0.93	23.46±0.73	103.07±7.71	57.43±4.31	11.44±0.67
NV	驼绒藜、油蒿、小画眉草和短花针茅	6.22±0.36	1.20±0.01	15.8±0.75	15.20±0.85	36.42±1.72	160.15±20.18	144.61±13.43	21.49±1.72
F				109.97	117.21	249.59	105.11	62.41	126.24
P				<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

土地利用类型	碳排放系数 /(kg·m^-2·a^-1)	参考文献
耕地	0.4970	冯杰等^[41],马远等^[42]
林地	-0.5810	冯杰等^[41],马远等^[42]
草地	-0.0205	郑永超等^[43]
水域	-0.0253	郑永超等^[43],孙赫等^[44]
未利用地	-0.0005	郑永超等^[43],孙赫等^[44]

土地利用类型	碳排放系数 /(kg·m^-2·a^-1)	参考文献
耕地	0.4970	冯杰等^[41],马远等^[42]
林地	-0.5810	冯杰等^[41],马远等^[42]
草地	-0.0205	郑永超等^[43]
水域	-0.0253	郑永超等^[43],孙赫等^[44]
未利用地	-0.0005	郑永超等^[43],孙赫等^[44]

能源种类	转换系数	碳排放系数/(t·t^-1)
原煤	0.7143 kg·t^-1	0.7559
洗精煤	0.9000 kg·t^-1	0.7559
焦炭	0.9714 kg·t^-1	0.8550
原油	1.4286 kg·t^-1	0.5854
汽油	1.4714 kg·t^-1	0.5538
柴油	1.4571 kg·t^-1	0.5921
燃料油	1.4286 kg·t^-1	0.6185
煤油	1.4545 kg·t^-1	0.5708
天然气	1.3300 kg·m³	0.4483
电力	0.1229 kg·kWh^-1	0.2720

Quantitative assessment on the supply-demand balance of carbon sequestration service in artificial sand-binding vegetation ecosystem at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 59

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

年份	碳排放总量 /10⁵t	碳排放比例/%		碳吸收总量 /10⁵t	碳吸收比例/%				净碳排放量 /10⁵t
年份	碳排放总量 /10⁵t	农田	建设用地	碳吸收总量 /10⁵t	林地	草地	水体	裸地	净碳排放量 /10⁵t
2015	20.95	1.46	98.54	0.122	0.02	90.24	9.44	0.30	20.83
2020	29.97	1.37	98.63	0.118	0.03	90.19	9.52	0.27	29.86

[1]	Guipeng Cui, Pan Gao, Weiyuan Kong, Mengchun Cui, Qi Lu. Combating desertification in the Great Green Wall Project： scientific concepts， technologies， and achievements [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(3): 11-20.
[2]	Xiulei Wang, Bo Zhang, Qing Chang, Xiangbo Sun, Xingyao Li, Bo Wu, Jia Li. Infrared camera traps for surveying mammal and bird diversity and activity rhythm in Zhongwei Shapotou National Nature Reserve， Ningxia [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(3): 162-174.
[3]	Jingweng Zhang, Jinyue Yin, Jiaqi Huo, Feng Cheng, Na Gao, Rui Yang, Jingting Bao, Jin Wang. Algal-bacteria interactions and their potential functions in ecological restoration areas [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(3): 93-101.
[4]	Xingyu Cheng, Zhiwei Xu, Yan Yu, Xiaoxiao Zhang. Changes in frequency and possible causes of dust occurrence in northern China and Mongolia since 2001 revealed by remote sensing [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(2): 47-60.
[5]	Yiying Yang, Silin Su, Enzhi Cao, Hongyou Li, Hongming Chi, Kai Lin, Xudong Wu, Wenqiang He, Haotian Yang. Impacts of large-scale desert photovoltaic power stations on the phenotype and biomass distribution characteristics of sand-fixing plants [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(1): 162-172.
[6]	Yuqiang Li, Xuyang Wang, Chengzhuo Zheng, Jie Lian, Xinping Liu, Xiangwen Gong, Yulong Duan, Xiaoming Mu, Lilong Wang. The practice on prevention and control of aeolian desertification and suggestion on the ecologically sustainable restoration in the Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(4): 302-314.
[7]	Jiayu Du, Xianfeng Liu, Gaopeng Sun, Shuangshuang Li. Spatiotemporal variation in vegetation optical depth and its influencing factors over the Loess Plateau during 2003-2018 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(3): 222-230.
[8]	Changxiang Pan, Qianru Ouyang, Mengyu Liao, Yu Fan, Qun Guo, Zhishan Zhang, Genan Wu, Yang Zhao, Lichao Liu, Yanxia Pan, Xinrong Li, Jianjun Qu, Songlin Mu, Shenggong Li. The applicability of ecological restoration technologies and sand industries to the deserted land in northwest arid region of China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(5): 155-165.
[9]	Yanqiao Zhao, Yuchao Lian, Wenwen Xu, Yixue Zhao, Gaoling Han, Yang Zhao. Research progress and prospect of artificial cyanobacteria crusts in China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(5): 214-222.
[10]	Guangzhao Han, Guangchao Cao, Shengkui Cao, Wenqian Ye. Soil particle organic carbon isotope decomposition characteristics of ecological restoration grassland and woodland in alpine region [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 36-43.
[11]	Wei Mao, Yanghe Zhao, Bohao He, Biying Jia, Weidong Li. Review on degradation mechanism and restoration strategies of seagrass ecosystem [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(1): 87-95.
[12]	Jianhua Xiao, Jianhua Si, Chun Liu, Xuejun Li, Haiyang Xi, Tengfei Yu, Chengqi Zhang, Chunyan Zhao, Meng Zhu, Bing Jia. Concept， connotation and development model of Desert Energy Ecosphere [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(5): 11-20.
[13]	Tian Zhang, Rongliang Jia, Yanhong Gao, Jingyao Sun, Yun Zhao, Lichao Liu. Niche characteristics and interspecific associations of main biocrust- forming organisms during the succession of artificially sand-binding vegetation in Shapotou， Ningxia， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 100-108.
[14]	Xiaobing Zhou, Bingchang Zhang, Yuanming Zhang. The theory and practices of biological soil crust rehabilitation [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 164-173.
[15]	Kang Wenyan, Wang Li, Qu Jianjun, Lu Qinchun. Wind tunnel simulation experiment on the protective effect of different structures of sand-blocking fence in Shapotou section of Baotou-Lanzhou Railway [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 94-99.