Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2010, Vol. 30 Issue (2): 247-253    DOI:
沙漠与沙漠化     
Evaluation of Ecological Security Pattern based on the Desertification Degree

ZHANG Ning, CHANG Xue-li, LI Xiu-mei, SUN Xiao-yan

Geography and Planning College, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, Shangdong, China
Download:  PDF (1645KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Using the method of synthetical evaluation index and taking township for research-scale, this article has comprehensively evaluated the ecological security pattern based on the desertification degree in Naiman County. Evaluation procedure was divided into two levels. For the first level there were desertification land and un-desertification land, their weight values were 0.7 and 0.3 respectively. The second level included twelve land use/cover types such as mobile dune, woodland etc. These weight values were determined by the dynamic degree of land use/cover types during evaluation periods. The evaluation results showed that the ecological security situation had undergone alternation from extremely unsafe to safe and to slight safe during period from 1975—1985, to 1985—1995, and to 1995—2005, respectively, and the ecological security synthetic indices were -4.06, 2.56 and 1.06 respectively. The situation of ecological security pattern was worse between 1985—1995 and 1995—2005, but was improved during 1975—2005 in Naiman County.
Key words:  ecological security pattern      evaluation of ecological security      desertification      Naiman County     
Received:  21 May 2009      Published:  20 March 2010
ZTFLH:  X171.1  

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Ning;CHANG Xue-li;LI Xiu-mei;SUN Xiao-yan. Evaluation of Ecological Security Pattern based on the Desertification Degree. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2010, 30(2): 247-253.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2010/V30/I2/247

[1]王涛,吴薇,薛娴,等.近50年来中国北方沙漠化土地的时空变化[J].地理学报,2004,59(2):203-212.
[2]Villa F,McLeod H.Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making;guidelines and applica-dons[J].Entriron Manag,2002,29(3):335-348.
[3]李自珍,李维德,石洪华,等.生态风险灰色评价模型及其在绿洲盐渍化农田生态系统中的应用[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(6):617-622.
[4]Callicott J B.Aldo Leopolds metaphor[C]//Costanza R,Norton B G,Haskell B D.Ecosystem Health:New Goals for Environment Management.Washington D C:Island Press,1992.
[5]廖空太,严子柱,常兆丰,等.荒漠绿洲防风固沙林体系的模糊综合评判——以高台县为例[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(6):1027-1032.
[6]黄和平,杨劼,宋炳煜,等.内蒙古黄土丘陵沟壑区生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1048-1056.
[7]高清竹,许红梅,江源,等.黄河中游砒砂岩地区长川流域土地利用覆盖安全格局初探[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(3):51-56.
[8]陈星.区域生态安全空间格局评价模型的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(1):21-28.
[9]王耕,吴伟.区域生态安全预警指数[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3535-3542.
[10]刘勇,刘友兆,徐萍.区域土地资源生态安全评价——以浙江嘉兴市为例[J].资源科学,2004,26(3):69-75.
[11]喻峰,李晓冰,王宏,等.皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价[J].地理学报,2006,61(6):645-653.
[12]李健英,常学礼.科尔沁典型地区流动沙地斑块动态与沙漠化过程[D].鲁东大学硕士论文,2008.
[13]朱震达,刘恕.中国北方沙漠化过程与分区治理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1981:30-46.
[14]王根绪,王建,仵颜卿.近10年黑河流域生态环境变化特征分析[J].地理科学,2002,22(5):527-534.
[15]肖盛春,肖洪浪.干旱区沙地资源农业利用模式的经济生态综合评判[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(1):63-68.
[16]沈慧,姜凤歧.水土保持林土壤改良效益评价研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):753-758.
[17]陈雅琳,常学礼,崔步礼,等.库布齐沙漠典型地区沙漠化动态分析[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(1):27-34.
[18]吴国庆.区域农业生态可持续发展的生态安全及其评价研究[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(3):227-233.
[19]杨建华,丁永建,陈仁升.长江黄河源区生态环境脆弱性评价初探[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(6):1012-1017.
[20]杜巧玲,许学工,刘文政.黑河中下游绿洲生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(9):1915-1923.
[21]左伟,王桥,王文杰,等.区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):67-71.
[22]沙日娜,陈立平.内蒙古奈曼旗生态环境现状与治理对策[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(9):54-57.
[23]宋保民,吕文.中国三北009项目在奈曼旗[J].防护林科技,2000(2):82-84.
[24]曹国军.古庙子小流域综合治理见成效[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(增刊):77-78.
[25]蒋德明,刘志民,曹成有,等.科尔沁沙地荒漠化过程与生态恢复[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003.
[26]赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程及其恢复机理[M].北京:海洋出版社,2003:93-94.
No Suggested Reading articles found!