Please wait a minute...
img

Wechat

Adv search
JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH  2012, Vol. 32 Issue (2): 517-524    DOI:
Weather and Climate     
Application of Three Drought Evaluation Indices in Ningxia
WANG Su-yan1,2, ZHENG Guang-fen1,2, YANG Jie1, LI Xin1
1.Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Preventing and Reducing in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750002, China;
2.Ningxia Climate Center, Yinchuan 750002, China
Download:  PDF (2799KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  The differences between drought degree assessment by indices as Pa, K, SPI, PDSI and CI, and results from the reality were analyzed from aspects of drought frequency, consistency degree, the vacancy and the miss drought rate of the index assessment. Results indicate that the evaluating effectiveness of these five indices is approximate. But in many years, the drought degrees evaluated by Pa, SPI and K indices are lower than the real, and that by K index is closest to the real. In many areas, the drought frequency evaluated by K index is higher than that by Pa and SPI, showing K index magnifies the drought frequency, especially the frequency of middle drought. In contrast, Pa and SPI indices shrink the frequency obviously. The absolute and the relative consistency rates of K index are all higher than that of Pa and SPI; the difference of consistency rate between Pa and SPI is not evident. Meanwhile, the vacancy rate of K index is higher than that of Pa and SPI, but the miss rate is lower than the two latter; the sum of the vacancy and the miss rates of K index is the lowest, and which in spring is lower than those in other three seasons. In conclusion, the evaluate effectiveness of K and CI is better than the other indices, but they must be improved to fit application in Ningxia .
Key words:  drought evaluation index      Ningxia      contrastive analysis     
Received:  31 May 2011      Published:  20 March 2012
ZTFLH: 

P426

 

Cite this article: 

WANG Su-yan, ZHENG Guang-fen, YANG Jie, LI Xin. Application of Three Drought Evaluation Indices in Ningxia. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2012, 32(2): 517-524.

URL: 

http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/     OR     http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V32/I2/517

[1]中国气象灾害大典·宁夏卷[M].北京:气象出版社,2007:11.

[2]李新周,马柱国,刘晓东.中国北方干旱化年代际特征与大气环流的关系[J].大气科学,2006,30(2):277-284.

[3]李新周,刘晓东,马柱国.近百年全球主要干旱区干旱化特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2004,21:97-103.

[4]张强,胡隐樵,曹晓彦,等.论西北干旱气候的若干问题[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(4):357-361.

[5]赵庆云,张武,王式功,等.西北地区东部干旱半干旱区极端降水事件的变化[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(6):904-908.

[6]董玉祥.我国半干旱地区现代沙漠化驱动因素的定量辩识[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(4):412-416.

[7]王继和,马全林,杨自辉,等.干旱区沙漠化土地逆转植被的时空格局及其机制研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(6):729-733.

[8]杨维西.全球变化中的中国干旱区响应与趋势[J].林业科学,2008,44(8):124-130.

[9]钱林青.黄土高原农业气候[M].北京:气象出版社,1991.

[10]李克让.中国干旱灾害研究与减灾对策[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1999.

[11]刘晓清,赵景波,于学峰.黄土高原气候暖干化趋势及适应对策[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(4):627-630.

[12]张建兴,马孝义,赵文举,等.黄土高原地区干旱长期变化趋势及预测[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(3):2-22.

[13]王鹏祥,何金海,郑有飞,等.近44年来我国西北地区干湿特征分析[J].应用气象学报,2007,18(6):769-774.

[14]袁文平,周广胜.标准化降水指标与Z指数在我国应用的对比分析[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4):523-529.

[15]刘永忠,李齐霞,孙万荣,等.气候干旱与作物干旱指标体系[J].山西农业科学,2005,33(3):50-53.

[16]陈仲全,张正栋,徐国昌.干旱指数与旱灾测防系统[J].中国沙漠,1995,15(3):10-18.

[17]杨小利.西北地区气象干旱监测指数的研究和应用[J].气象,2007,33(8):90-96.

[18]王志南,朱筱英,柳达平,等.基于干旱自然过程的干旱指数研究和应用[J].南京气象学院学报,2007,30(1):134-139.

[19]宫德吉.干旱监测预警指数研究[J].气象,1998,24(8):14-18.

[20]庞万才,周晋隆,王桂芝.关于干旱监测评估指标的一种新探讨[J].气象,2005,31(10):32-34.

[21]王劲松,冯建英.甘肃省河西地区径流量干旱指数初探[J].气象,2000,26(6):3-7.

[22]张强,鞠笑生,李淑华.三种干旱指标的比较和新指标的确定[J].气象科技,1998,2:48-52.

[23]冯建民,梁旭,张智.宁夏旱涝灾害动态监测指标及其应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(6):71-77.
No Suggested Reading articles found!