乌兰布和沙区比拉底白刺(Nitraria billardieri)的气体交换参数及抗旱生理特性

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00073

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在乌兰布和沙区，以本地白刺为对照，对从澳大利亚引进的3个种源（代号分别为NB1、NB2和NB3）比拉底白刺（Nitraria billardieri）的光合速率日变化、光响应曲线及相对含水量、叶绿素含量、可溶性糖含量、脯氨酸含量、相对电导率等生理指标进行测定。结果表明：（1）不同种源白刺净光合速率日变化均呈"双峰"曲线，在14：00出现光合"午休"现象，且午休主要受气孔因素影响，蒸腾速率呈"单峰"曲线；（2）不同种源白刺净光合速率随光强的增加而增加，达到饱和点后净光合速率呈下降趋势；NB2具有较高的光饱和点和较低的光补偿点，说明其对光强的适应能力较强；NB1的暗呼吸速率显著高于NB2、NB3和本地白刺（P<0.05），说明NB1具有较强抵御胁迫的能力；利用综合评判法得出不同种源白刺利用光能能力的顺序为NB2 > NB1 > 本地白刺 > NB3；（3）不同种源白刺的叶绿素、脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量随种源的变化趋势相同，均是NB2显著高于NB1、NB3和本地白刺（P<0.05）；NB1的丙二醛含量最高，显著高于NB2、NB3和本地白刺（P<0.05）；（4）根据隶属函数值法对不同种源白刺的抗旱性进行综合评价，不同种源白刺的抗旱性顺序为NB2 > NB1 > 本地白刺 > NB3。

关键词: 比拉底白刺(Nitraria billardieri), 气体交换, 光响应, 生理特性

Abstract: In the ulan buh desert, Nitraria tangutorum was used as a control,and three native provenances (named NB1, NB2 and NB3) introduced from Australia of Nitraria billardieri measured photosynthetic rate, light response curve and relative water content, chlorophyll content, soluble sugar content, proline content and relative conductivity. Results showed:(1) The diurnal changes of photosynthetic rate of different provenances showed "double peak" curve, and the photosynthetic "lunch break" phenomenon appeared at 14:00. The "lunch break" was mainly affected by stomatal factors,and the transpiration rate was "single peak" curve.(2) The net photosynthetic rate increased with the increase of light intensity, and the net photosynthetic rate decreased with the increase of saturation point. NB2 has a high light saturation point and a lower light compensation point, indicating that its ability to adapt to light intensity is strong; The dark respiration rate of NB1 was significantly higher than that of NB2, NB3 and N. tangutorum (P<0.05), which indicated that NB1 had strong ability to resist stress. Using the comprehensive evaluation method, the order of using the light energy ability of different provenances was NB2 > NB1 > N. tangutorum > NB3; (3) The contents of chlorophyll, proline and soluble sugar in different provenances were the same as those of NB2, NB3 and N. tangutorum (P<0.05);The content of MDA in NB1 was the highest, which was significantly higher than that of NB2, NB3 and N. tangutorum (P<0.05).(4) According to the membership function method, the drought resistance of different provenances was analyzed. The order of drought resistance of different provenances was NB2 > NB1 > N. tangutorum > NB3.

Key words: Nitraria billardier, gas exchange, light response, physiological characteristics

中图分类号:

Q945.78

徐军, 陈海玲, 郝玉光, 董礼隆, 段娜, 李帅, 马迎宾, 段瑞兵, 刘禹廷. 乌兰布和沙区比拉底白刺(Nitraria billardieri)的气体交换参数及抗旱生理特性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(5): 917-924.

Xu Jun, Chen Hailing, Hao Yuguang, Dong Lilong, Duan Na, Li Shuai, Ma Yingbin, Duan Ruibing, Liu Yuting. Gas Exchange and Drought-resistant Physiological Characteristics of Nitraria billardier Provenances in Ulan Buh Desert[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(5): 917-924.

参考文献

[1] Noble J C,Whalley R D B.The biology and autecology of Nitraria L.in AustraliaⅡ:seed germination,seeding establishment and reponse salinity[J].Australian Journal of Ecology,1978,3(2):165-177.
[2] Shen M Y,Zuanazzi J A,Kan C,et al.Alkaloids from Nitraria billardieri[J].Natural Product Letters,1995,6(2):119-125.
[3] 韩凤兰,陈宇红.白刺的开发利用[J].宁夏农林科技,2001,5:15-16.
[4] 李天才,索有瑞.青海柴达木地区植物白刺叶中微量元素特征[J].广东微量元素科学,2002,9(4):66-68.
[5] 王宁.白刺资源及开发前景[J].陕西林业科技,2000,1:17-18.
[6] 张红晓,康向阳.白刺组织培养技术的研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(1):56-64.
[7] 康向阳.林木多倍体育种研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(4):70-74.
[8] 刘生龙,高志海,崔建国,等.唐古特白刺种源试验[J].西北植物学报,1997,17(6):115-118.
[9] 张锦春,赵明,张应昌,等.灌溉植被梭梭、白刺光合蒸腾特性及影响因素研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(1):70-76.
[10] 田新民,赵长明,邓建明,等.沿民勤绿洲荒漠过渡带分布的4种优势植物光合生理响应[J].草业学报,2011,20(4):108-115.
[11] 何炎红,郭连生,田有亮.白刺叶不同水分状况下光合速率及其叶绿素荧光特性的研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(11):2226-2233.
[12] 韩永伟,拓学森,高馨婷,等.阿拉善荒漠草原梭梭与白刺光合特征比较研究[J].草地学报,2010,18(3):314-319.
[13] 王静静,张文鹏,徐当会.NaCl胁迫下钙对沙拐枣(Calligonum arborescens)株高及光合特性的影响[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(1):167-174.
[14] 周海燕,黄子琛.不同时期毛乌素沙区主要植物种光合作用和蒸腾作用的变化[J].植物生态学报,1996,20(2):120-131.
[15] Manabe S,Tang W,Fu L.Scale effects of increased atmospheric CO₂ on the ocea-atmosphere system[J].Nature,1993,364:215-218.
[16] 贾荣亮,周海燕,谭会娟,等.超旱生植物红砂与珍珠光和生理生态日变化特征初探[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):631-636.
[17] 许大全.光合作用效率[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002:51-65.
[18] 韦兰英,曾丹娟,张建亮,等.岩溶石漠化区四种牧草植物光合生理适应性特征[J].草业学报,2010,19(3):212-219.
[19] 祁娟,师尚礼,徐长林,等.4种披碱草属植物光合作用光响应特性的比较[J].草业学报,2013,22(6):100-107.
[20] 徐军,郝玉光,刘芳,等.不同种源地白刺种子形态性状与苗期生长状况分析[J].种子,2014,33(8):68-70.
[21] Bierhuizen J F,Slatyer R O.Effect of atmospheric concentration of water vaporand CO₂ in determining transpiration-photosynthesis relationships of cotton leavfes[J].Agricultural Eteorology,1965,2:259-270.
[22] Berry J A,Downton W J.Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis of Carbon Metabolism and Plant Productivity[M].New York,USA:Academic Press,1982:263-343.
[23] 张政宪.作物生理研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1990:32-40.
[24] 李合生.植物生理生化试验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:11-30.
[25] 熊庆娥.植物生理学实验教程[M].成都:四川科技出版社,2003:122-126.
[26] 王彩华.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1988:85-96.
[27] 刘家琼,黎志坚,蒲锦春,等.我国沙漠中部地区主要不同生态类型植物脯氨酸的累积、光合、呼吸和叶绿素含量[J].植物学报,1988,30(1):85-95.
[28] 李红生,刘广全,陈存根,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区沙棘光合特性及气孔导度的数值模拟[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2009,37(4):108-120.
[29] 马木木,李熙萌,石莎,等.科尔沁沙地黄柳(Salix gordejevii)光合特性[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):352-357.
[30] 毛新安,赵哈林,李瑾,等.樟子松(Pinus sylvestnis var.mongolica)幼苗对持续风吹的光合生理响应[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(1):64-70.
[31] Farquhar G D,Sharkey T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiololgy,1982,33:317-345.
[32] 陈海玲,苜蓿雄性不育系及其杂交组合的主要性状分析[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.
[33] 何文兴,易津,李洪梅.根茎禾草乳熟期净光合速率日变化的比较研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(2):205-209.
[34] 刘玉华,贾志宽,史纪安,等.早作条件下不同苜蓿品种光合作用的日变化[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1468-1477.
[35] 罗维成,曾凡江,刘波,等.绿洲-沙漠过渡带引种植物光合生理特征研究[J].草业学报,2013,22(2):273-280.
[36] 邓蕾,李高扬,王艳,等.4种结缕草光合特性及叶绿素含量的比较研究[J].草原与草坪,2010,30(1):7-10.
[37] 迟丽华,宋凤斌.松嫩平原4种植物光合作用光响应特性的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2007,29(2):119-122.
[38] 罗大庆,薛会英,权红,等.干旱胁迫下砂生槐、锦鸡儿的生理生化特性与抗旱性[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(9):122-127.
[39] 杨淑琴,周瑞莲,梁慧敏,等.沙漠植物抗氧化酶活性及渗透调节物质含量与光合作用的关系[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(6):1557-1564.
[40] 周紫娟,苏培玺,谢婷婷,等.不同生境下红砂(Reaumuria soongorica)的生理生化特征及适应性[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(4):1007-1014.
[41] Demir Y,Kocacaliskan I.Effect of Nacl and proline on bean seedlings cultured in vitro[J].Biologia Plantarum,2002,45(4):597-599.
[42] 任文伟,钱吉,马骏,等.不同地理种群羊草在聚乙二醇胁迫下含水量和游离脯氨酸含量的比较[J].生态学报,2000,20(2):349-352.
[43] Demiral T,Türkan I.Comparative lipid peroxidation,antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2005,53:247-257.
[44] 鲍婧婷,王进,苏洁琼.不同林龄柠条(Caragana korshinskii)的光合特性和水分利用特征[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(1):199-205.
[45] Fischer R A,Turner N C.Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones[J].Annal Review of Plant Physiology,1978,29:227-317.
[46] 郝建辉,石凤翎.不同扁蓿豆材料抗旱性比较研究[J].中国草地学报,2006,28(3):39-42.
[47] 刘国亮.十一种沙生植物在科尔沁沙区的水分生理与抗旱性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.