干旱区啤酒花农艺性状与品质的关系

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 明确啤酒花农艺性状与品质的相关性，可以为啤酒花种质资源优选鉴定提供依据。分析了甘肃省河西地区引进的50份啤酒花种质材料单蔓花数、花穗长、花穗粗、单花重、百花重、干鲜比与产量和品质的关系。结果表明：干旱半干旱地区啤酒花种质资源农艺性状和品质指标均存在较大变异，为优异资源的筛选创造了条件。农艺性状和品质指标存在一定相关性，其中，花穗粗和单花重均与干鲜比显著正相关（R²=0.293和R²=0.288），花穗长和干鲜比与黄腐酚含量呈极显著正相关且干鲜比对黄腐酚含量贡献大于花穗长，而6个主要农艺性状均与α-酸含量无显著相关性。花穗长、花穗粗可以作为干鲜比大、产量和黄腐酚含量高、药用价值好的啤酒花种质资源筛选的农艺性状指标，但高α-酸含量的啤酒花种质资源无法通过农艺性状去筛选。

关键词: 啤酒花, 农艺性状, 变异特征, 品质, 相关关系, 干旱区

Abstract: The relationship between the main agronomic traits, yield and quality of 50 hops germplasms was analyzed to determine the agronomic traits, which could be used to select the high yield and high quality hops. The results showed that both agronomic traits and quality indicators existed large variation, which could create conditions for screening of excellent resources. There was some correlation between agronomic traits and quality indexes. There was a significant positive correlation between the spike thick (R²=0.293), the single flower weight (R²=0.288) and the ratio of fresh weight and dry weight. There was also a significant positive correlation between spike length, the ratio of fresh weight and dry weight and the content of xanthohumol, and the contribution to content of xanthohumol of the fresh weight and dry fresh ratio was higher than that of spikes length. However, the six main agronomic traits had no significant correlation with content of alpha-acid. The results indicated that the hops germplasms with high ratio of fresh and dry weight, yield, xanthohumol content and medicinal value could be selected by agronomic traits such as spike length and spike thick, while which could not be screening indicators for the germplasms with high alpha-acid content.

Key words: hops, agronomic traits, variation characteristics, quality, correlation, arid region

中图分类号:

杨轲, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 李葆春, 司二静, 汪军成, 任盼荣, 王化俊. 干旱区啤酒花农艺性状与品质的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4): 772-779.

Yang Ke, Meng Yaxiong, Ma Xiaole, Li Baochun, Si Erjing, Wang Juncheng, Ren Panrong, Wang Huajun. Analysis of Relationship between Variations Characteristics of Main Agronomic Traits and Quality in Hops[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(4): 772-779.

参考文献

[1] 李峰.马格努门啤酒花品质特性研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2013.
[2] 侯建华,郑红丽,杨丽君,等.玉米种质资源品质性状与主要农艺性状相关性分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2001(2):71-74.
[3] 何水华,陈飞,许国萍,等.几个水稻品种主要农艺性状及其产量、品质的分析[J].上海农业科技,2016(4):41-42.
[4] 郭小红,王兴才,孟田,等.中国辽宁省和美国俄亥俄州育成大豆品种形态、产量和品质性状的比较研究[J].中国农业科学,2015,21:4240-4253.
[5] 张金巍,韩粉霞,孙君明,等.大豆微核心种质蛋白质及脂肪含量的遗传变异[J].植物遗传资源学报,2014(2):405-410.
[6] 陈华萍,魏育明,王照丽,等.四川小麦地方品种农艺性状分析[J].西南农业学报,2006,19(5):791-795.
[7] 王娟,孔宪辉,刘丽,等.北疆优质杂交棉农艺性状与产量品质相关性研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,24:183-186.
[8] 熊皓平.啤酒花化学成分及黄腐酚提纯技术的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[9] 刘海英,张霞,原俊凤,等.新疆野生啤酒花遗传多样性的形态和SSR比较分析[J].北方园艺,2009(4):15-19.
[10] 朱妍,薛华.浅析啤酒花α-酸检测过程中应注意的问题[J].技术交流,2006(1):48-49.
[11] 熊皓平,何国庆,玄国东,等.啤酒花中黄酮成分提取工艺的优化研究[J].中国中药杂志,2006(10):809-811.
[12] 管敦仪.啤酒工业手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1985:250-253.
[13] 雷敬敷.酒花中α-酸的含量及其影响因素[J].食品科学,1994(2):12-16.
[14] 王鹏涛,延军平,蒋冲,等.2000-2012年陕甘宁黄土高原区地表蒸散时空发布及影响因素[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):499-507.
[15] 张新慧.河西地区啤酒花品质弱化的成因研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2006.
[16] 邓武明,阳小虎,文凤君,等.甘蓝型油菜产量性状的遗传及相关与通径分析[J].中国油料作物学报,2003,25(4):27-30.
[17] 魏飞鹏,黄玉吉.甜椒主要农艺性状与产量相关及通径分析[J].热带作物学报,2004,25(4):50-53.
[18] 张丽英,张正斌,徐萍,等.黄淮小麦农艺性状进化及对产量性状调控机理的分析[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(5):1013-1028.
[19] Grausgrubera H,Oberforsterb M,Ghambashidzec G,et al.Yield and agronomic traits of Khorasan wheat (Triticum turanicum Jakubz.)[J].Field Crops Research,2005,91:319-327.
[20] 杨建华,杨春华,李仕贵.杂交水稻品质性状与农艺性状的相关性分析[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2007,32(5):91-94.
[21] 李建国,韩勇,刘博,等.水稻品种农艺性状与产量的相关分析[J].北方水稻,2008,38(3):78-80.
[22] Hairmansis A,Kustianto B,Supartopo S.Correlation analysisof agronomic characters and grain yield of rice for tidal swamp areas.Indonesian[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,2010,11(1):11-15.
[23] Mathure S,Shaikh A,Renuka N,et al.Haracterisation of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm and correlation between their agronomic and quality traits[J].Euphytica,2011,179:237-246.
[24] 张继宁,袁文业,郭仰东.茄子主要农艺性状的相关与通径分析[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(5):290-292.
[25] 魏飞鹏,黄玉吉.甜椒主要农艺性状与产量相关及通径分析[J].热带作物学报,2004,25(4):50-53.
[26] 王彩洁,李连华,李伟,等.大豆品种产量与主要性状的主成分分析[J].山东农业科学,2008(1):5-6.
[27] 詹园凤,党选民,戚志强,等.长豇豆种质资源主要农艺及品质性状分析[J].南方农业学报,2015(11):2006-2010.
[28] 田和彬,汪军妹,华为,等.大麦主要农艺和品质性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析[J].浙江农业学报,2011(3):433-438.
[29] 佟汉文,黄荣华,刘易科,等.小麦新品种农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析[J].湖北农业科学,2008,47(7):758-760.
[30] 宋健民,戴双,李豪圣,等.山东省近年来审定小麦品种农艺和品质性状演变分析[J].中国农业科学,2013(6):1114-1126.
[31] 王利民,党占海,张建平,等.胡麻农艺性状与品质性状的相关性分析[J].中国农学通报,2013,27:88-92.
[32] 赵利,党占海,张建平,等.不同类型胡麻品种资源品质特性及其相关性研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008(5):6-9.
[33] 汪宝卿,王鲁豫,解备涛,等.北方区试中甘薯农艺和品质性状的相关性及主成分分析[J].中国农学通报,2013,21:66-71.
[34] 李晴,韩玉珠,张广臣.辣椒品种主要农艺性状的相关性和主成分分析[J].长江蔬菜,2010(6):29-33.
[35] 崔兰舫,周宝利,张桂凡.洋葱鳞茎农艺性状与产量相关性及通径分析[J].北方园艺,2008(5):12-14.
[36] 刘晓静,张进霞,李文卿,等.施肥及刈割对干旱地区紫花苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(6):1516-1526.