绿豆和大豆叶片光合作用对科尔沁沙地光照条件的响应

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用LI-6400便携式光合作用测定系统比较科尔沁沙地大田种植的绿豆(Phaseolus radiatus L.)和大豆(Glycine max)两种豆科作物的净光合速率(Pn)、胞间CO2浓度(Ci)、气孔导度(Gs) 的日变化;同时用便携式荧光仪(Handy-PEA)测定了PSⅡ最大量子效率(Fv/Fm)和PSⅡ最初电子受体QA的库容(Sm)的日变化。两种作物叶片净光合速率(Pn)的日变化曲线均为单峰曲线,峰值均在08:00;且08:00后绿豆叶片Pn均大于大豆。气孔导度在全天进程中一直呈下降趋势;分析表明:10:00—14:00 Pn的降低的主要原因是非气孔因素。与大豆相比,光照强烈(>1 455 μmol·m-2·s -1)的时段(08:00—14:00),绿豆能够更有效地调控Ci、Gs、Fv/Fm和 Sm。另外,与7月下旬开花期研究结果相比,随着环境条件的变化和植物的生长发育期的不同,绿豆调节其光合适应对策:气孔调节能力增强,叶片对流经PSⅡ的电子传递的调控能力增强。因此,较高的适应强烈光照的能力和对环境条件变化快速响应的能力有利于绿豆在科尔沁沙地灌溉不便的雨养农田中进行广泛栽培。

关键词: 光合作用, 科尔沁沙地, 绿豆, 大豆, 适应

Abstract:

Mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus L.) and soybean (Glycine max), as two main leguminous crops are abroad cultivated in Horqin Sandy Land. LI-6400 Portable Photosynthesis System was used to study the characteristics of diurnal patterns of net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and stomatal conductance (Gs) in leaves of mungbean and soybean. At the same time, the diurnal patterns of maximal quantum yield of photosystem Ⅱ(Fv/Fm) and pool size (Sm) of photosystem Ⅱprimary electron acceptor (QA) in their leaves were measured with Handy-PEA. The two crops had apparent differences in their one-peak curves of Pn in the day course. The time when the peak values of their Pn occurred was similar at 8:00, and Pn in mungbean leaves was higher than that in soybean leaves after 8:00. It was suggested that mungbean could keep a higher Pn than soybean under high solar radiation (>1 455 μmol·m- 2·s - 1). The stomatal conductance (Gs) in leaves of mungbean and soybean declined during the day, and did not show the "noonbreak". It was not suggested that the stomatal factors contributed to the drop of Pn during 10:00—14:00. Compared with soybean, mungbean could effectively adjust intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs), maximal quantum yield of photosystem Ⅱ (Fv/Fm) and pool size (Sm) of photosystemⅡ primary electron acceptor QA, under high solar radiation (>1 455 μmol·m- 2·s - 1) during 8:00—14:00. Thus it could effectively adjust the degree of stomatal opening and photo inhibition, controlled the electron transport and dissipated reductant energy absorbed by chlorophyⅡ. It was suggested that Mungbean had higher capacity of adaptation to high radiation than soybean. In addition, compared with the study result acquired in the last ten-day of July, Mungbean regulated its countermeasure of photosynthetic adaptation, the limit of stoma limited photosynthesis less but the leaves had higher capacity to regulate the reduction state of QA, thus restricting the electron transport more effectively through photosystemⅡ. As a result of the capacity of higher adaptation to high radiation and the quick responses to the environmental changes, it favors that Mungbean can be abroad cultivated in the non-irrigated crop land in Horqin Sandy Land.

Key words: photosythesis, Horqin Sandy Land, Mungbean, Soybean, adaptation

中图分类号:

Q945.11

罗亚勇;赵学勇;岳广阳;毛伟;郭轶瑞;张春民. 绿豆和大豆叶片光合作用对科尔沁沙地光照条件的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(2): 259-263.

LUO Ya-yong;ZHAO Xue-yong;YUE Guang-yang;MAO Wei;GUO Yi-rui;ZHANG Chun-min. Respondence to High Radiation of Leaf Photosynthesis of Mungbean and Soybean in Horqin Sandy Land[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2009, 29(2): 259-263.

参考文献

[1]Faville M J,Silvester W B,Green T G A,等.Photosynthetic characteristics of three asparagus cultivars differing in yield[J].Crop Sci, 1999(39):1070－1077.
[2]云建英,杨甲定,赵哈林.干旱和高温对植物光合作用的影响机制研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(3):641－648.
[3]杨甲定,赵哈林,张铜会.从叶片光合作用分析绿豆和谷子对科尔沁沙地光照条件的适应能力[J].作物学报,2004,30(3):232－235.
[4]Krause G H,Weis E.Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis:the basics[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol,1996(42):313－346.
[5]李鹏民,高辉远,Reto J Strasser.快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2005(06):5－12.
[6]刘新民,赵哈林,赵爱芬.科尔沁沙地风沙环境与植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1996:1－8.
[7]Strasser R J,Srivastava A,Tsimilli-Michael M.The fluorecence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples[C]//Yunus M,Pathre U,Mohanty P,eds.Probing Photosynthesis:Mechanism,Regulation & Adaptation.London:Taylor & Francis Press,2000:445－483.
[8]许大全.光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题[J].植物生理学通讯,1997,33(4):241－244.
[9]许大全.植物光胁迫研究中的几个问题[J].植物生理学通讯,2003,39(5):493－495.
[10]谭会娟,周海燕,李新荣,等.珍稀濒危植物半日花光合作用日动态变化的初步研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):262－267.
[11]Franco A C,Lüttge U.Midday depression in savanna trees:coordinated adjustments in photochemical efficiency,photorespiration,CO2 assimilation and water use efficiency.Oecologia,2002(131):356－365.
[12]Bilger W,Bjrkman O,Thayer S S.Light induced spectral absorbance changes in relation to photosynthesis and the epoxidation state of xanthophylls cycle components in cotton leaves.Plant Physiol,1989(91):542－551.
[13]龚吉蕊,赵爱芬,苏培玺,等.黑河流域几个主要植物种光合特征的比较研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):587－592.
[14]Farquhar G D,Sharkey T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.Annu Rev Plant Physiol,1982(33):317－345.
[15]贾荣亮,周海燕,谭会娟,等.超旱生植物红砂与珍珠光合生理生态日变化特征初探[J].中国沙漠,2006,26（4）:631－636.
[16]郭宏宇,杨劼,郭景山,等.西鄂尔多斯铁路防护林柠条锦鸡儿和沙冬青对不同管护措施的生理生态响应[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):81－87.
[17]刘长利,王文全,崔俊茹,等.干旱胁迫对甘草光合特性与生物量分配的影响[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(1):142－145.
[18]苏培玺,严巧娣.C4荒漠植物梭梭和沙拐枣在不同水分条件下的光合作用特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):75－82.
[19]苏培玺,赵爱芬,张立新,等.荒漠植物梭梭和沙拐枣光合作用、蒸腾作用及水分利用效率特征[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(1):11－17.
[20]Ott T,Clarke J,Birks K,et al.Regulation of the photosynthetic electron transport chain[J].Planta,1999(209):250－258.