Influence of HDPE honeycomb sand fixation on soil moisture

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00054

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 136-144.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00054

Previous Articles Next Articles

Influence of HDPE honeycomb sand fixation on soil moisture

Li Minlan¹, Qu Jianjun², Tang Ximing³, Dun Yaoquan², Chen Xiaoying¹, Wu Ting¹, Song Naiping¹

1. MOE Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwest China, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;
2. Dunhuang Gobi and Desert Ecology and Environment Research Station/Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Zhongwei Sand Control Forest Farm, Zhongwei City Forestry Ecological Construction Bureau, Zhongwei 755000, Ningxia, China

Received:2019-04-01 Revised:2019-05-09 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-01-18

Abstract

Abstract: Using mechanical sand barrier sand fixation as a precursor to carry out biological sand fixation has been recognized as a model for engineering sand control. In recent years, the difference in sand-fixing effect between traditional material sand barriers and new material sand barriers has been attracting attention. The soil moisture content of the quicksand, the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier and the semi-concealed wheat straw sand barrier were measured by neutron moisture meter. The sand-fixing effect was attempted by comparing the soil moisture content of the quicksand and the two kinds of mechanical sand barriers, the response of soil water storage to rainfall, and the change of soil water content in different soil layers under different growth stages. The results show that:(1) Two kinds of mechanical sand barriers have better water storage effect on soil moisture, and the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier has higher water storage capacity than straw sand barrier, and the significant difference is less than 0.001, which is extremely significant difference; (2) During longer drought times, the change of soil water storage in straw sand barrier has a hysteresis compared with the soil water storage of the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier; (3) the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier and straw sand barrier It has better water retention effect, but the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier has higher water retention effect due to its high durability; (4) The soil moisture content of the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier 60-110 cm soil layer is significantly higher than that of straw. The effect of square soil water content and sand fixation time is more obvious. From the middle of laying, the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier has a soil moisture content of 7% in 60-110 cm soil layer, and sometimes soil moisture will appear in some soil layers. More than 8%of the cases; (5) From the perspective of biological sand fixation in the sand control project, the indirect effect of the new HDPE honeycomb sand barrier on individual plant growth is larger than that of straw sand barrier.

Key words: straw sand barrier, HDPE honeycomb sand barrier, soil water content, water balance equation

CLC Number:

Li Minlan, Qu Jianjun, Tang Ximing, Dun Yaoquan, Chen Xiaoying, Wu Ting, Song Naiping. Influence of HDPE honeycomb sand fixation on soil moisture[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 136-144.

References

[1] 屈建军,凌裕泉,俎瑞平,等.半隐蔽格状沙障的综合防护效益观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):329-335.
[2] 马瑞,王继和,屈建军,等.不同结构类型棉秆沙障防风固沙效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):48-51.
[3] Borges A R,Viegas D X.Shelter effect on a row of coal piles to prevent wind erosion[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1988,29(1/3):145-154.
[4] Lee Sang-Joon,Park Ki-Chul,Park Cheol-Woo.Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements[J].Atmospheric Environment,2002(9):1453-1463.
[5] 原伟杰,虞毅,王戈,等.可降解聚乳酸沙障降解性能研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):107-110.
[6] 张利文,周丹丹,高永.沙障防沙治沙技术研究综述[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,43(3):363-369.
[7] 张圆,李芳,屈建军,等.机械沙障组合对土壤含水量及温度的影响[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1533-1538.
[8] 屈建军,喻文波,秦晓波.HDPE功能性固沙障防风效应试验[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(5):1185-1193.
[9] 韩致文,郭彩贇,钟帅,等.库布齐沙漠HDPE网和植物纤维网沙障防沙试验效应[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(4):681-689.
[10] 马学喜,王海峰,李生宇,等.两种固沙方格沙障的防护效益及地形适应性对比[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):344-349.
[11] 王逸敏,刘康,屈建军.沙障对流沙地植被和土壤养分的影响[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):56-65.
[12] 黄子琛,沈渭寿.干旱区植物的水分关系与耐旱性[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000:49-53.
[13] 张建军,李慧敏,徐佳佳.黄土高原水土保持林对土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):71-81.
[14] 王新平,张志山,张景光,等.荒漠植被影响土壤水文过程研究述评[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):54-59.
[15] 王耀琳.民勤沙区70种植物的物候观测分析[J].甘肃林业科技,1992(4):40-50.
[16] 杨自辉,俄有浩.干旱沙区46种木本植物的物候研究——以民勤沙生植物园栽培植物为例[J].西北植物学报,2000(6):1102-1109.
[17] 马瑞,赵锦梅,马彦军,等.沙障对不同林龄雨养梭梭林冠下浅层土壤含水量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):138-142.
[18] 成聪聪,闫德仁,海春兴.PLA沙障对沙丘迎风坡土壤水分的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(3):176-181.
[19] 胡英娣.方格沙障麦草致腐因素与防腐方法的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,1988,2(1):82-91.
[20] 王睿,周立华,陈勇,等.库布齐沙漠机械防沙措施的防护效益[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(2):330-336.
[21] 原鹏飞,丁国栋,王炜炜,等.毛乌素沙地降雨入渗和蒸发特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2008(4):23-27.
[22] 王艳莉,刘立超,高艳红,等.人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态及空间分布[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):942-950.
[23] Sutherland S,Vickery R K.Trade-offs between sexual and asexual reproduction in the genus Mimulus[J].Oecologia,1988,76(3):330-335.
[24] Cheplick G P.Life history trade-offs in amphibromus scabrivalvis (Poaceae):allocation to clonal growth,storage,and cleistogamous reproduction[J].American Journal of Botany,1995,82(5):621-629.
[25] de Wreedr R E,Klinger T.Reproductive strategies in Algae[M]//Doust J L,Doust L L.Plant Reproductive Ecology:Patterns and Strategies.New York,USA:Oxford University Press,1900:268-269.
[26] 张大勇.理论生态学研究[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:10-45.
[27] 肖洪浪,李新荣,段争虎,等.流沙固定过程中土壤-植被系统演变对水环境的影响[J].土壤学报,2003(6):809-814.

Influence of HDPE honeycomb sand fixation on soil moisture

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yahong Li, Chongfeng Bu, Qi Guo, Yingxin Wei. Ecological functions comparison of moss crust and algae crust in the Mu Us Sand Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 138-144.
[2]	Yunhua Ma, Tu Feng, Yangzheng Li, Qingqing Jin. Adaptability of the Hippophae rhamnoides seedlings on different degrees of soil dressing for rocky desertification [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 228-233.
[3]	Quanlin Ma, Jinchun Zhang, Fang Chen, Dekui Zhang, Linyuan Wei. Mechanism and dynamics for succession of artificial Hedysarum scoparium sand-binding forests at the southern edge of Tengger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 206-215.
[4]	Zhang Kehai, Hu Guanglu, Fang Qiao, Zhang Yujia, Li Haoran. Water content in the root zone of sand-fixation vegetation in desert-oasis ecotone in the middle reaches of the Heihe River [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(3): 33-42.
[5]	Li Yunfei, Xie Ting, Shi Wanli, Li Xiaojun. Response of Topsoil Organic Carbon Mineralization to Litter Addition in the Revegetation Area in the Southeastern Fringe of the Tengger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(5): 200-209.
[6]	Meng Yangyang, Liu Bing, Liu Chan. Dynamic Process of Water-Heat-Salt in Soil and the Mechanism in the Desert Oasis Wetland [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(1): 149-160.
[7]	Luo Weicheng, Zhao Wenzhi, Sun Chengpeng, Yan Jialiang. Changes in Species Composition, Diversity and Soil Water Content of Pinus sylvestris Artificial Sand-fixation Forest along An Afforestation Successional Gradient in Horqin [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(1): 126-132.
[8]	Li Hongying, Liu Guohou, Han Chunrong, Ma Shaowei, Lan Qing. Response of Seed Germination and Seedling Emergence of Tetraena mongolica to Soil Water Content and Sand Burial Depth [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(5): 910-916.
[9]	Zhang Yuan, Li Fang, Qu Jianjun, Yan Peiying. Effect of Sand Barrier Combinations on the Water Content and Temperature of Soil [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1533-1538.
[10]	Chen Yongbao, Hu Shunjun, Zhun Hai, Luo Gen. Soil Evaporation of Haloxylon ammodendron Community in the Southern Gurbantunggut Desert [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(1): 190-198.
[11]	WEI Bin1,2, YIMITI Haimiti1,3, WANG Qing-feng1,2, XU Ning1,2, LI Jian-tao1,2. Correlation of Burial Depth of Groundwater and Soil Water Content in the Keriya Oasis, Xinjiang, China [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(4): 1110-1116.
[12]	LIU Dian-jun1,2, WU Bo1, LI Yong-hua1, LIN Guang-hui3, CHEN Shi-ping4, ZHU Ya-juan1, LU Qi1， YAO Bin1. Effect of Rain Supplementation on Soil Respiration of Nitraria sphaerocarpa Community in Hyperarid Area of Dunhuang, China [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(3): 788-796.
[13]	Mubareke Ayoupu;CHEN Ya-ning;LIWei-hong;HAO Xing-ming;MA Jian-xin;SU Rui. Fine Root Distribution of Populus euphratica Oliv.and Its Relations with Soil Factors under Extremely Arid Environment [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2011, 31(6): 1449-1458.
[14]	ZHANG Kai;;FENG Qi;L Yong-qing;ZHANG Bo;SI Jian-hua. Study on Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Water Contents in Oasis-desert Belt of Minqin [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2011, 31(5): 1149-1155.
[15]	HUANG Xiang;LI Wei-hong;MA Jian-xin;CHEN Ya-peng;ZHU Cheng-gang;. Influence of Photosynthesis on Soil Respiration Rates for Populus euphratica in Different Light Conditions in Arid Environments [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2011, 31(5): 1167-1173.