Grain size characteristics of dune sands and spatial variation in the Tengger Desert

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00028

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 133-145.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00028

Previous Articles Next Articles

Grain size characteristics of dune sands and spatial variation in the Tengger Desert

Aibaidoula Gulayisaimu¹(), Feng Zhang¹(), Feng Wu², Shixin Wu³, Jianghua Zheng¹, Tao Sun⁴

^1.College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences，Xinjiang University，Urumqi 830046，China
^2.Institute of Earth Environment，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Xi'an 710061，China
^3.Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Urumqi 830011，China
^4.Institute of Chinese Historical Geography，Fudan University，Shanghai 200433，China

Received:2022-01-17 Revised:2022-03-29 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-22
Contact: Feng Zhang

Abstract

Abstract:

Sediment grain size parameters are of great significance for studying material sources and measuring the energy size. The grain size characteristics of 45 surface sand samples from the top of the dunes in the Tengger Desert were measured， and the Drift Potential of four weather stations in the past 30 years was calculated. The results show that：（1） Samples are mainly composed of fine （71%） and medium sands （20%）， with main grain size of 2.38 Φ and sorting of 0.40 Φ. There are good linear relationships between grain size and sorting， grain size and skewness. （2） The very well and well-sorted samples are entirely distributed in the middle and southwest of the desert， the former tends to be nearly symmetrical and medium-kurtosis， and the probability cumulative curve is composed of two-distinctive populations， while the latter tends to be positive skewness， medium or leptokurtosis， and the probability cumulative curve is composed of three-distinctive populations. However， the sorting of desert edge is inconsistent， and the probability cumulative curve is composed of multi-different populations. （3） The direction of prevailing sand-driving wind in the study area is northwest wind. The northwest and northeast parts of the desert were characterized by intermediate wind energy environment， with the unimodal and complex wind direction. The southern and southeastern parts of the desert belong to low and intermediate wind energy environment respectively， both of which are bimodal wind direction. The main sources of dunes in this area should be local detritus act of the underlying fluvial and lacustrine sediments. The fluvial and lacustrine sediments at the edge of the desert provide sources for the dune sands in the central region， the dune sands in the southwestern part may have originated from alluvial-lacustrine deposits in the lower reaches of Shiyang River， and the wind sorting effect is long， while the dune sands at the edge of the desert should be derived from local detritus act of the alluvial and lacustrine sediments， and the wind sorting effect is insufficient. There is a certain relationship between the spatial distribution characteristics of grain size parameters and dune type and size.

Key words: Tengger Desert, sediments, grain size parameters, sand drift potential, spatial variation

CLC Number:

P931.3

Aibaidoula Gulayisaimu, Feng Zhang, Feng Wu, Shixin Wu, Jianghua Zheng, Tao Sun. Grain size characteristics of dune sands and spatial variation in the Tengger Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 133-145.

Figures/Tables 10

References 45

1	Zhang Z， Dong Z， Li J.Grain-size characteristics of dune networks in China's Tengger Desert［J］.Geografiska Annaler，2016，97（4）：681-693.
2	宁凯，李卓仑，王乃昂，等.巴丹吉林沙漠地表风积砂粒度空间分布及其环境意义［J］.中国沙漠，2013，33（3）：642-648.
3	钱广强，董治宝，罗万银，等.巴丹吉林沙漠地表沉积物粒度特征及区域差异［J］.中国沙漠，2011，31（6）：10-17.
4	朱春鸣，董治宝，刘铮瑶，等.古尔班通古特沙漠树枝状沙丘沉积物粒度和微形态特征的空间分异［J］.中国沙漠，2021，41（2）：9-18.
5	成都地质学院陕北队.沉积岩（物）粒度分析及其应用［M］.北京：地质出版社，1976：44-65.
6	Pye K， Tsoar H.Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes［M］. Berlin，Germany：Springer，2009：51-61.
7	Folk R L， Ward W C.Brazos River Bar：a study in the significance of grain size parameters［J］.Journal of Sedimentary Research，1957，27（1）：3-26.
8	吉启慧.粒度分析在塔克拉玛干沙漠研究中的应用［J］.中国沙漠，1996，16（2）：173-179.
9	宋洁，春喜，白雪梅，等.中国沙漠粒度分析研究综述［J］.中国沙漠，2016，36（3）：597-603.
10	Livingstone I， Bullard J E， Wiggs G，et al.Grain-size variation on dunes in the Southwest Kalahari，Southern Africa［J］.Journal of Sedimentary Research，1999，69（3）：546-552.
11	Lancaster N.Grain-size characteristics of linear dunes in the southwestern Kalahari［J］.Journal of Sedimentary Research，1986，56（3）：395-400.
12	朱震达，吴正，刘恕，等.中国沙漠概论［M］.北京：科学出版社，1980：3-73.
13	哈斯.腾格里沙漠东南缘格状沙丘粒度特征与成因探讨［J］.地理研究，1998，17（2）：67-73.
14	哈斯，王贵勇.沙坡头地区新月形沙丘粒度特征［J］.中国沙漠，2001，21（3）：271-275.
15	李超，董治宝，崔徐甲.腾格里沙漠东南缘不同发育阶段横向沙丘粒度特征［J］.中国沙漠，2015，35（1）：129-135.
16	李再军.腾格里沙漠腹地钻孔揭示的沙漠形成与古环境演化历史［D］.兰州：兰州大学，2013.
17	庞红丽，程捷，丛殿阁，等.腾格里沙漠北缘沙丘粒度特征及区域差异分析［J］.宁夏大学学报（自然科学版），2015，36（3）：267-273.
18	阎满存，董光荣，李华梅，等.腾格里沙漠东南缘沙漠演化的初步研究［J］.中国沙漠，1998，18（2）：16-22.
19	张克存，屈建军，俎瑞平，等.腾格里沙漠东南缘风沙活动动力条件分析：以沙坡头地区为例［J］.干旱区地理，2008，31（5）：643-649.
20	Li Y， Wang N A， Li Z L，et al.Holocene palynological records and their responses to the controversies of climate system in the Shiyang River drainage basin［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin，2011，56（6）：535-546.
21	Qiang M， Chen F， Wang Z，et al.Aeolian deposits at the southeastern margin of the Tengger Desert （China）： implications for surface wind strength in the Asian dust source area over the past 20，000 years［J］.Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology，2010，286（1/2）：66-80.
22	马玉贞，张虎才.腾格里沙漠晚更新世孢粉植物群与气候环境演变［J］.植物学报，1998，40（9）：871-879.
23	马永欢，樊胜岳.沙漠化地区退耕还林政策的生态经济效应分析：以民勤县为例［J］.自然资源学报，2005，20（4）：590-596.
24	吴正.中国沙漠及其治理［M］.北京：科学出版社，2009：562-568.
25	Zhang K， Qu J， An Z.Characteristics of wind-blown sand and near-surface wind regime in the Tengger Desert，China［J］.Aeolian Research，2012，6：83-88.
26	Fan Y， Mou X， Wang Y，et al.Quaternary paleoenvironmental evolution of the Tengger Desert and its implications for the provenance of the loess of the Chinese Loess Plateau［J］.Quaternary Science Reviews，2018，197：21-34.
27	Fryberger S G.Dunes Forms and Wind Regime［M］//McKee E D.A Study of Global Sand Seas.US Geological Survey Professional Paper，1979：137-169.
28	赵婧，闵鹏，张珊珊，等.建筑气候数据的平稳化处理与缺失数据补充［J］.建材与装饰，2018（26）：291-292.
29	Zhang Z C， Dong Z B， Wen Q，et al.Wind regimes and aeolian geomorphology in the western and southwestern Tengger Desert，NW China［J］.Geological Journal，2015，50（6）：707-719.
30	李恩菊.巴丹吉林沙漠与腾格里沙漠沉积物特征的对比研究［D］.西安：陕西师范大学，2011.
31	Lancaster N.Winds and sand movements in the Namib Sand Sea［J］.Earth Surface Processes & Landforms， 2010， 10（6）：607-619.
32	Li J， Dong Z， Zhang Z，et al.Grain-size characteristics of linear dunes on the northern margin of Qarhan Salt Lake，northwestern China［J］.Journal of Arid Land，2015，7（4）：438-449.
33	Yang X， Rost K T， Lehmkuhl F，et al.The evolution of dry lands in northern China and in the Republic of Mongolia since the Last Glacial Maximum［J］.Quaternary International，2004，118：69-85.
34	Zhang H C， Peng J L， Ma Y Z，et al.Late Quaternary palaeolake levels in Tengger Desert，NW China［J］.Palaeogeography，Palaeoclimatology，Palaeoecology，2004，211（1）：45-58.
35	杨东，方小敏，董光荣，等.1.8 Ma BP以来陇西断岘黄土剖面沉积特征及其反映的腾格里沙漠演化［J］.中国沙漠，2006，26（1）：6-13.
36	谭见安.内蒙古阿拉善荒漠的地方类型［J］.地理集刊，1964，8：1-31.
37	Zhu B， Yu J.Aeolian sorting processes in the Ejina desert basin （China） and their response to depositional environment［J］.Aeolian Research，2014，12：111-120.
38	陈渭南.塔克拉玛干沙漠84°E沿线沙物质的粒度特征［J］.地理学报，1993，48（1）：33-46.
39	Yang Y Y， Qu Z Q， Shi P J，et al.Wind regime and sand transport in the corridor between the Badain Jaran and Tengger Deserts，central Alxa Plateau，China［J］.Aeolian Research，2014（12）：143-156.
40	哈斯，庄燕美，王蕾，等.毛乌素沙地南缘横向沙丘粒径频率及其对风向变化的响应［J］.地理科学进展，2006，25（6）：42-51.
41	张虎才，马玉贞，彭金兰，等.距今42~18 ka腾格里沙漠古湖泊及古环境［J］.科学通报，2002，47（24）：1847-1857.
42	张虎才，马玉贞，李吉均，等.腾格里沙漠南缘全新世古气候变化初步研究［J］.科学通报，1998，43（12）：1252-1258.
43	梁爱民，屈建军，董治宝，等.库姆塔格沙漠沉积物粒度端元特征及其物源启示［J］.中国沙漠，2020，40（2）：33-42.
44	李卓仑，高有红，李若兰，等.阿拉善沙漠全新世钙质根管形成机制及其古环境指示意义：来自微观形态学证据［J］.沉积学报，2018，36（6）：1131-1138.
45	邹学勇，刘玉璋，吴丹，等.若干特殊地表风蚀的风洞实验研究［J］.地理研究，1994，13（2）：41-48.

站名	风向																合计
站名	N	NNE	NE	ENE	E	ESE	SE	SSE	S	SSW	SW	WSW	W	WNW	NW	NNW	合计
民勤	0.56	0.44	0.42	0.84	2.41	3.90	0.93	0.16	0.16	0.16	0.30	0.45	2.36	13.47	10.14	3.84	40.55
景泰	1.99	0.99	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.70	1.68	2.14	1.89	1.53	0.00	0.40	1.74	5.43	3.00	5.65	27.14
中卫	0.85	1.46	0.57	1.29	10.37	5.09	1.25	0.92	0.45	0.28	0.31	0.76	2.61	12.40	8.99	1.07	48.67
阿拉善左旗	4.38	5.11	1.45	0.92	0.67	4.51	5.72	2.42	1.13	2.33	0.53	0.22	0.93	1.95	1.15	6.42	39.84

站名	风向																合计
站名	N	NNE	NE	ENE	E	ESE	SE	SSE	S	SSW	SW	WSW	W	WNW	NW	NNW	合计
民勤	0.56	0.44	0.42	0.84	2.41	3.90	0.93	0.16	0.16	0.16	0.30	0.45	2.36	13.47	10.14	3.84	40.55
景泰	1.99	0.99	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.70	1.68	2.14	1.89	1.53	0.00	0.40	1.74	5.43	3.00	5.65	27.14
中卫	0.85	1.46	0.57	1.29	10.37	5.09	1.25	0.92	0.45	0.28	0.31	0.76	2.61	12.40	8.99	1.07	48.67
阿拉善左旗	4.38	5.11	1.45	0.92	0.67	4.51	5.72	2.42	1.13	2.33	0.53	0.22	0.93	1.95	1.15	6.42	39.84

	样品编号	纬度N/（°）	经度E/（°）	地貌类型	M_z/Φ	σ/Φ	SK	K_g
	TL-05	39.18	103.62	格状沙丘	2.84	0.32	0.11	1.08
	TL-10	38.87	103.85	格状沙丘	2.38	0.34	0.14	0.99
	TL-16	38.68	103.56	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.59	0.34	0.06	1.03
	TL-20	39.05	104.27	格状沙丘	2.71	0.32	0.09	1.06
	TL-42	38.41	103.66	格状沙丘	2.62	0.29	0.06	0.99
	TL-46	37.51	104.96	格状沙丘	2.59	0.34	0.08	1.04
	TL-48	37.77	105.03	格状沙丘	2.45	0.31	0.10	0.93
	TL-50	38.25	105.16	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.73	0.34	-0.12	1.14
	TL-52	38.47	104.69	格状沙丘	2.52	0.27	0.08	1.01
	TL-56	38.32	104.17	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.54	0.29	0.10	1.07
	TL-58	38.77	104.29	格状沙丘	2.68	0.34	-0.05	1.11
	TL-60	38.78	104.47	格状沙丘	2.67	0.30	0.09	1.03
	TL-62	38.26	104.82	草灌丛沙丘	2.53	0.30	0.12	1.07
	TL-64	38.55	104.44	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.74	0.30	0.03	1.03
	TL-66	38.35	104.49	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.43	0.30	0.08	0.97
	TL-70	38.06	104.32	格状沙丘	2.21	0.31	0.19	1.14
	TL-74	38.01	104.79	格状沙丘	2.84	0.30	0.12	1.07
	TL-76	38.59	104.93	复杂横向沙丘(或沙山)	2.17	0.31	0.21	1.07
	TL-84	39.60	104.38	格状沙丘	2.46	0.34	0.10	0.96
	TL-86	39.91	104.22	格状沙丘	2.32	0.30	0.13	1.07
平均值	—			—	2.55	0.31	0.09	1.04
最小值	—			—	2.17	0.27	-0.12	0.93
最大值	—			—	2.84	0.34	0.21	1.14
标准偏差	—			—	0.19	0.02	0.07	0.06

	样品编号	纬度N/（°）	经度E/（°）	地貌类型	M_z/Φ	σ/Φ	SK	K_g
	TL-05	39.18	103.62	格状沙丘	2.84	0.32	0.11	1.08
	TL-10	38.87	103.85	格状沙丘	2.38	0.34	0.14	0.99
	TL-16	38.68	103.56	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.59	0.34	0.06	1.03
	TL-20	39.05	104.27	格状沙丘	2.71	0.32	0.09	1.06
	TL-42	38.41	103.66	格状沙丘	2.62	0.29	0.06	0.99
	TL-46	37.51	104.96	格状沙丘	2.59	0.34	0.08	1.04
	TL-48	37.77	105.03	格状沙丘	2.45	0.31	0.10	0.93
	TL-50	38.25	105.16	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.73	0.34	-0.12	1.14
	TL-52	38.47	104.69	格状沙丘	2.52	0.27	0.08	1.01
	TL-56	38.32	104.17	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.54	0.29	0.10	1.07
	TL-58	38.77	104.29	格状沙丘	2.68	0.34	-0.05	1.11
	TL-60	38.78	104.47	格状沙丘	2.67	0.30	0.09	1.03
	TL-62	38.26	104.82	草灌丛沙丘	2.53	0.30	0.12	1.07
	TL-64	38.55	104.44	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.74	0.30	0.03	1.03
	TL-66	38.35	104.49	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.43	0.30	0.08	0.97
	TL-70	38.06	104.32	格状沙丘	2.21	0.31	0.19	1.14
	TL-74	38.01	104.79	格状沙丘	2.84	0.30	0.12	1.07
	TL-76	38.59	104.93	复杂横向沙丘(或沙山)	2.17	0.31	0.21	1.07
	TL-84	39.60	104.38	格状沙丘	2.46	0.34	0.10	0.96
	TL-86	39.91	104.22	格状沙丘	2.32	0.30	0.13	1.07
平均值	—			—	2.55	0.31	0.09	1.04
最小值	—			—	2.17	0.27	-0.12	0.93
最大值	—			—	2.84	0.34	0.21	1.14
标准偏差	—			—	0.19	0.02	0.07	0.06

	样品编号	纬度N/（°）	经度E/（°）	地貌类型	M_z/Φ	σ/Φ	SK	K_g
	TL-22	38.62	103.86	格状沙丘	2.22	0.40	0.20	1.02
	TL-24	38.44	103.15	格状沙丘	2.12	0.39	0.08	0.98
	TL-26	37.79	103.29	草灌丛沙丘	2.32	0.39	0.26	1.06
	TL-28	38.18	103.46	草灌丛沙丘	2.21	0.44	0.25	1.08
	TL-30	38.16	102.96	格状沙丘	2.13	0.43	0.26	0.95
	TL-32	38.05	103.04	格状沙丘	2.33	0.35	0.17	1.02
	TL-34	37.85	103.68	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.09	0.39	0.21	1.11
	TL-36	37.77	104.10	格状沙丘	2.42	0.35	0.05	0.98
	TL-38	37.64	104.64	格状沙丘	2.36	0.35	0.14	0.95
	TL-40	38.10	103.61	格状沙丘	2.03	0.36	0.31	1.23
	TL-44	38.17	104.01	格状沙丘	2.11	0.39	0.22	1.06
	TL-54	38.46	103.95	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.27	0.44	0.12	0.94
	TL-72	37.87	104.46	格状沙丘	2.24	0.41	0.03	1.04
平均值	—			—	2.22	0.39	0.18	1.03
最小值	—			—	2.03	0.35	0.03	0.94
最大值	—			—	2.42	0.44	0.31	1.23
标准偏差	—			—	0.12	0.03	0.09	0.08

Grain size characteristics of dune sands and spatial variation in the Tengger Desert

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 45

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

	样品编号	纬度N/（°）	经度E/（°）	地貌类型	M_z/Φ	σ/Φ	SK	K_g
	TL-01	39.64	103.20	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.07	0.54	0.43	0.87
	TL-03	39.40	103.79	草灌丛沙堆	2.71	0.78	-0.20	1.00
	TL-07	40.04	103.89	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.22	0.40	0.18	1.01
	TL-09	39.28	103.86	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.24	0.47	0.21	0.91
	TL-12	38.81	103.45	草灌丛沙堆	2.62	0.64	-0.15	0.96
	TL-14	38.50	103.45	新月形沙丘和沙丘连	1.85	0.61	0.35	1.08
	TL-18	39.34	104.10	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.44	0.40	0.17	1.08
	TL-78	38.55	105.57	新月形沙丘和沙丘链	2.04	0.42	0.32	1.16
	TL-80	38.53	105.12	复杂横向沙丘(或沙山)	2.19	0.56	-0.03	1.14
	TL-82	38.76	105.15	复杂横向沙丘(或沙山)	2.04	0.64	0.20	0.78
	TL-88	39.22	104.75	格状沙丘	2.41	0.43	0.23	1.00
	TL-90	38.94	105.08	格状沙丘	2.34	0.42	0.10	0.87
平均值	—			—	2.26	0.53	0.15	0.99
最小值	—			—	1.85	0.40	-0.20	0.78
最大值	—			—	2.71	0.78	0.43	1.16
标准偏差	—			—	0.25	0.12	0.19	0.12

[1]	Xiangjie Li, Zhiwen Li, Dingding Du, Li Sun, Chu Hou, Shiqian Li, Wen Zhang. Sediments and spatial pattern characteristics of Vitex trifolia nebkhas in the Houtian sandy land of Nanchang， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 211-220.
[2]	Fusen Nan, Zongxing Li, Xiaoping Zhang, Qiao Cui, Yuchen Li, Anle Yang, Xueting Xiong. Spatial variation of ecological stoichiometry characteristics of hilly soil in Lanzhou section of Yellow River north shore [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 167-176.
[3]	Yunfeng Zhang, Yijuan Ma, Zhizhu Su, Aimin Liang, Xin Zhang, Yingying Cui. Dune movement in the joint zone of the Badain Jaran Desert and Tengger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 82-91.
[4]	Min Chen, Baosheng Li, Fengnian Wang, Dongfeng Niu, Xiaohao Wen, Peixian Shu, Yuejun Si, Qinjiang Yang, Chen Wang. High-resolution monsoonal environment change in MIS3 based on trace elements in the Tumen Section on the southweest edge of Tegger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 253-263.
[5]	Hui Zhao, Hongyu Yang, Xingfan Wang, Keqi Wang. Geochronology of the typical sediments in the Badain Jaran Desert： the progress and issues [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(1): 57-65.
[6]	Lizhu Xing, Fangmin Zhang, Kaicheng Xing, Yunpeng Li, Qi Lu, Feifei Lu. Change of soil wind erosion and attribution in Bayannur， Inner Mongolia based on the Revised Wind Erosion Equation [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(5): 111-119.
[7]	Zhaoyun Wang, Gaihong Niu, Benli Liu. Applicability of three indexes for estimating the intensity of blown-sand activity [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(3): 118-129.
[8]	Xiangjie Li, Zhiwen Li, Jiangzhen Zhan, Li Sun, Lan Du, Chu Hou. Grain size characteristics and influencing factors of sediments in the Houtian sandy land of Nanchang， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 92-99.
[9]	Min Tian, Guangqiang Qian, Zhuanling Yang, Wanyin Luo, Junfeng Lu. Characteristics of wind regime and its influences on the development of aeolian landforms in the Haertenghe Reach, northeastern Qaidam Basin, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 1-9.
[10]	Wenfan Wang, Rentao Liu, Zhixia Guo, Yonghong Feng, Jiayu Jiang. Physical and chemical properties and fractal dimension distribution of soil under shrubs in the southern area of Tengger Dseart [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 209-218.
[11]	Yalu Zhang, Xi Chun, Haijun Zhou, Yangyang Zhang, Xiaozhen Wang. Grain size discriminant method for eolian and lacustrine sediments of deserts and it’s environmental indication [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 1-9.
[12]	Guangyin Hu, Zhibao Dong, Zhengcai Zhang, Ming Zhou, Lunyu Shang. The regime of sand driving wind and sand drift potential in Zoige Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 20-24.
[13]	Zisha Wang, Yunfa Miao, Yongtao Zhao, Fang Li, Yan Lei, Mingxing Xiang, Yaguo Zou. Characteristics of microcharcoal in the lake surface sediments in the northern margin of Qaidam Basin of China and its environmental significance [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 10-17.
[14]	Haotian Yang, Xinrong Li, Peijie Yan, Yunfei Li, Quanlin Ma. Soil types and spatial distribution in Tengger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 154-162.
[15]	Bingyao Wang, Xingchen Liu, Lichao Liu. Characteristics of precipitation in the surrounding area of Tengger Desert in 1957-2017 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 163-170.