Responses of plant species diversity to land use change： a case study in the Heihe River Basin

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00055

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 221-232.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00055

Responses of plant species diversity to land use change： a case study in the Heihe River Basin

Shengtang Wang¹^,²^,⁴(), Yingchun Ge¹^,², Shaokun Wang³, Xiaolong Zhang⁵, Ying Yang⁶()

^1.Heihe Remote Sensing Experimental Research Station /, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Lanzhou 730000，China
^2.Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing of Gansu Province /, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Lanzhou 730000，China
^3.Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Lanzhou 730000，China
^4.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100049，China
^5.School of Resources and Environment，Shanxi University of Finance and Economics，Taiyuan 030006，China
^6.Gansu Taohe National Nature Reserve Administration，Hezuo 747000，Gansu，China

Received:2021-01-13 Revised:2022-04-08 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2023-01-09
Contact: Ying Yang

Abstract

Abstract:

Plant species diversity is seriously affected by land use change in the Heihe River Basin. This study used the Dyna-CLUE model to simulate land use change in 2050 to understand the trends of plant species diversity under the influence of natural and socioeconomic factors on land use change in the Heihe River Basin， to reveal land use change in the Heihe River Basin under the influence of multiple factors， and the relationship between land use change and herbaceous and shrub species diversity. The results showed that factors such as precipitation， GDP and distance from natural villages jointly drove land use changes， and the increase of forest， grassland and water and the decrease of unutilized land area in 2050 increased the diversity of shrubs and herbs and led to a higher evenness and a decrease of interspecific dominance. The expansion of farmland and intensification of farming land lead to uneven distribution of plants and decrease in diversity. The combination of model simulation results and plant species diversity trends can provide a basis for future land use planning， policy and ecological conservation decisions. Corresponding biodiversity and ecological protection policies should be formulated for land use changes in different regions to promote ecological restoration and support sustainable development in the Heihe River Basin.

Key words: land use change, Dyna-CLUE model, species diversity, Heihe River Basin

CLC Number:

Q948.1

Shengtang Wang, Yingchun Ge, Shaokun Wang, Xiaolong Zhang, Ying Yang. Responses of plant species diversity to land use change： a case study in the Heihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 221-232.

Figures/Tables 8

References 58

1	Deng L， Liu G B， Shangguan Z P.Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China's "Grain-for-Green" Program：a synthesis［J］.Global Change Biology，2014，20（11）：3544-3556.
2	Mertens B， Lambin E F.Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon［J］.Annals of the Association of American Geographers，2000，90（3）：467-494.
3	Goldewijk K K， Ramankutty N.Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities：the availability of new global data sets［J］.GeoJournal，2004，61（4）：335-344.
4	Goldewijk K K.Three centuries of global population growth：a spatial referenced population （density） database for 1700-2000［J］.Population and Environment，2005，26（4）：343-367.
5	Ramankutty N， Foley J A.Estimating historical changes in global land cover：croplands from 1700 to 1992［J］.Global Biogeochemical Cycles，1999，13（4）：997-1027.
6	葛全胜，戴君虎，何凡能，等.过去300年中国土地利用、土地覆被变化与碳循环研究［J］.中国科学（D辑：地球科学），2008，38（2）：197-210.
7	Veech J A.Incorporating socioeconomic factors into the analysis of biodiversity hotspots［J］.Applied Geography，2003，23（1）：73-88.
8	Lambin E F.Land-Use and Land-Cover change （LUCC）：implementation strategy［J］.Global Change Report （Sweden），1999，48：91-102.
9	Kleijn D， Kohler F， Báldi A，et al.On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe［J］.Proceedings of the Royal Society B：Biological Sciences，2009，276（1658）：903-909.
10	Liu J， Kuang W， Zhang Z，et al.Spatiotemporal characteristics，patterns，and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s［J］.Journal of Geographical Sciences，2014，24（2）：195-210.
11	白娥，薛冰.土地利用与土地覆盖变化对生态系统的影响［J］.植物生态学报，2020，44（5）：543-552.
12	Parker D C， Manson S M， Janssen M A，et al.Multi-Agent Systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change：a review［J］.Annals of the Association of American Geographers，2003，93（2）：314-337.
13	Turner Ii B L， Skole D， Sanderson S，et al.Land-use and land-cover change：science/research plan［R］.Stockholm，Swedon：IGBP Report No.35/HDP Report No.7，1995：132.
14	蒲英霞，马荣华，马晓冬，等.长江三角洲地区城市规模分布的时空演变特征［J］.地理研究，2009，28（1）：161-172.
15	侯西勇，常斌，于信芳.基于CA-Markov的河西走廊土地利用变化研究［J］.农业工程学报，2004，20（5）：286-291.
16	孟成，卢新海，彭明军，等.基于Markov-C 5.0的CA城市用地布局模拟预测方法［J］.中国土地科学，2015，29 （6）：82-88.
17	聂婷，肖荣波，王国恩，等.基于Logistic回归的CA模型改进方法：以广州市为例［J］.地理研究，2010，29（10）：1909-1919.
18	谢正磊，许学工，孙强.基于Patch-Dynamics模式的土地覆被变化预测：以北京市为例［J］.北京大学学报（自然科学版），2008，44（3）：452-458.
19	郭延凤，于秀波，姜鲁光，等.基于CLUE模型的2030年江西省土地利用变化情景分析［J］.地理研究，2012，31（6）：1016-1028.
20	Verburg P H， Overmars K P.Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling：exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model［J］.Landscape Ecology，2009，24（9）：1167-1181.
21	Price B， Kienast F， Seidl I，et al.Future landscapes of Switzerland：risk areas for urbanisation and land abandonment［J］.Applied Geography，2015，57：32-41.
22	Promper C， Puissant A， Malet J P，et al.Analysis of land cover changes in the past and the future as contribution to landslide risk scenarios［J］.Applied Geography，2014，53：11-19.
23	钟方雷，徐中民，窪田顺平，等.黑河流域分水政策制度变迁分析［J］.水利经济，2014，32（5）：37-42.
24	陆志翔，肖洪浪，张志强，等.黑河流域近两千年人-水-生态演变研究进展［J］.地球科学进展，2015，30（3）：396-406.
25	Jiang X H， Liu C M.The influence of water regulation on vegetation in the lower Heihe River［J］.Journal of Geographical Sciences，2010，20（5）：701-711.
26	刘金巍，靳甜甜，刘国华，等.黑河中上游地区2000-2010年土地利用变化及水土保持服务功能［J］.生态学报，2014，34（23）：7013-7025.
27	He X， Liang J， Zeng G，et al.The effects of interaction between climate change and land-use/cover change on biodiversity-related ecosystem services［J］.Global Challenges，2019，3（9）：1800095.
28	李占玲，徐宗学.黑河上游山区径流变化特征分析［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2012，26（9）：51-56.
29	李占玲，王小娟.黑河中上游气象要素单调变化趋势分析［J］.地理研究，2011，30（11）：2059-2066.
30	党素珍，刘昌明，王中根，等.近10年黑河流域上游积雪时空分布特征及变化趋势［J］.资源科学，2012，34（8）：1574-1581.
31	Sala O E， Chapin F S， Armesto J J，et al.Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100［J］.Science，2000，287（5459）：1770-1774.
32	张晓龙，周继华，蔡文涛，等.水分梯度下黑河流域荒漠植物群落多样性特征［J］.生态学报，2017，37（14）：4627-4635.
33	王建华.2012年新编黑河流域2000年土地利用/土地覆盖数据集［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2015.
34	王建华.黑河流域土地利用/土地覆被数据集（2011）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2014.
35	Hu X L， Lu L， Li X，et al.Land use/cover change in the Middle Reaches of the Heihe River Basin over 2000-2011 and its implications for sustainable water resource management［J］.PloS One，2015，10（6）：19.
36	Hu X L， Lu L， Li X，et al.Ejin Oasis land use and vegetation change between 2000 and 2011：the role of the ecological water diversion project［J］.Energies，2015，8（7）：7040-7057.
37	国家基础地理信息中心.黑河流域1公里DEM数据集（2011）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2013.
38	吴立宗，年雁云.黑河流域道路分布数据集（2010）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2013.
39	国家基础地理信息中心.黑河流域河流分布数据集（2009）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2013.
40	国家基础地理信息中心.黑河流域居民点数据集［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2013.
41	王雪梅，马明国.黑河流域人口格网化数据集（2000）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2013.
42	王雪梅，李新，马明国.干旱区内陆河流域人口统计数据的空间化：以黑河流域为例［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2007，21（6）：39-47.
43	岳天祥，赵娜.黑河流域月均植被指数和平均降水数据集（1961-2010）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2018.
44	赵娜，岳天祥.黑河流域多年平均气温数据集（1961-2010）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2016.
45	王子丰，徐宗学，张淑荣.黑河中游植被样方调查数据（2013-2014）［DS］.国家青藏高原科学数据中心，2016.
46	Verburg P H， Nijs T， Eck J，et al.A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns［J］.Computers Environment & Urban Systems，2004，28（6）：667-690.
47	Trisurat Y， Alkemade R， Verburg P H.Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in Northern Thailand［J］.Environmental Management，2010，45（3）：626-639.
48	Pontius R G， Schneider L C.Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed，Massachusetts，USA［J］.Agriculture，Ecosystems & Environment，2001，85（1）：239-248.
49	Swets J A.Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems［J］.Science，1988，240（4857）：1285-1293.
50	Pontius R.Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps［J］.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing，2001，67（5）：540-540.
51	马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ：α多样性的测度方法（上）［J］.生物多样性，1994，2（3）：162-168.
52	Maggurran A E.Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement ［M］.Princeton，USA：Princeton University Press，1988.
53	中国科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性研究的原理与方法［M］.北京：中国科学技术出版社，1994.
54	鱼腾飞，冯起，司建华，等.黑河下游额济纳绿洲植物群落特征与物种多样性研究［J］.西北植物学报，2011，31（5）：1032-1038.
55	赵海莉，赵锐锋，张丽华，等.黑河中游湿地典型植物群落特征与物种多样性［J］.生态学杂志，2013，32（4）：813-820.
56	He C， Zhang J， Liu Z，et al.Characteristics and progress of land use/cover change research during 1990-2018［J］.Journal of Geographical Sciences，2022，32（3）：537-559.
57	Mi X， Feng G， Hu Y，et al.The global significance of biodiversity science in China：an overview［J］.National Science Review，2021，8（7）：nwab032.
58	Albert C H， Herve M， Fader M，et al.What ecologists should know before using land use/cover change projections for biodiversity and ecosystem service assessments［J］.Regional Environmental Change，2020，20（3）：1-12.

驱动因子	耕地	林地	草地	水域	建设用地	未利用土地
海拔	-0.004633	-0.002520	0.000032	0.000437	0.002479	0.002399
坡度	-0.194415	0.114363	0.036294	-0.004712	0.070852	0.004448
与河流距离	-0.000535	-0.000078	0.000007	-0.000079	0.000300	0.000175
与高速公路距离	-0.000011	0.000005	-0.000003	-0.000015	0.000005	0.000006
与干道距离	-0.000072	-0.000032	-0.000001	0.000007	-0.000180	0.000022
与自然村距离	-0.000169	-0.000134	-0.000084	-0.000032	-0.000729	0.000127
GDP	0.018967	-0.016861	-0.101271	-0.018268	0.006181	-0.053895
人口总数	-0.001504	0.001221	0.002097	0.000228	-0.000646	0.002378
降水	0.022171	0.002215	0.004593	-0.007821	-0.003478	-0.012619
气温	-0.028120	-0.044876	-0.006865	-0.023630	0.021173	0.032494
常数	8.799812	1.665596	-1.511415	-2.429919	-12.168004	-5.789236
ROC值	0.978	0.882	0.919	0.899	0.949	0.972

驱动因子	耕地	林地	草地	水域	建设用地	未利用土地
海拔	-0.004633	-0.002520	0.000032	0.000437	0.002479	0.002399
坡度	-0.194415	0.114363	0.036294	-0.004712	0.070852	0.004448
与河流距离	-0.000535	-0.000078	0.000007	-0.000079	0.000300	0.000175
与高速公路距离	-0.000011	0.000005	-0.000003	-0.000015	0.000005	0.000006
与干道距离	-0.000072	-0.000032	-0.000001	0.000007	-0.000180	0.000022
与自然村距离	-0.000169	-0.000134	-0.000084	-0.000032	-0.000729	0.000127
GDP	0.018967	-0.016861	-0.101271	-0.018268	0.006181	-0.053895
人口总数	-0.001504	0.001221	0.002097	0.000228	-0.000646	0.002378
降水	0.022171	0.002215	0.004593	-0.007821	-0.003478	-0.012619
气温	-0.028120	-0.044876	-0.006865	-0.023630	0.021173	0.032494
常数	8.799812	1.665596	-1.511415	-2.429919	-12.168004	-5.789236
ROC值	0.978	0.882	0.919	0.899	0.949	0.972

[1]	Wenwen Xu, Yanqiao Zhao, Nan Wang, Yang Zhao. Effects of artificial biological soil crusts on the composition and diversity of herbaceous plant communities [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 204-211.
[2]	Jing Luo, Xiaoxia Huang, Hong Cheng, Ning Jiang, Xuyu Mo, Xiuyu Wang. Impacts of landscape structure changes on ecosystem services in the Hunshandake Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 99-109.
[3]	Zhaobin Song, Zhiming Xin, Yajuan Zhu. Characteristics of shrub communities in the desert-steppe ecotone of Inner Mongolia， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(2): 104-112.
[4]	Xiaolong Zhao, Yuhong Xie, Xujun Ma, Shaokun Wang. Vegetation structure and its relationship with soil physicochemical properties in restoring sandy grassland in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(2): 134-141.
[5]	Xuexiang Chang, Huaishun Chen, Zhigang Li, Hongping Zhang. Species diversity of ecological restoration plant communities in typical desert areas of the Brahmaputra River Basin in Tibet [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 187-194.
[6]	Jun Lei, Xiaohu Yang, Hongmei Liu, Yuhong Zhao, Juping Fan, Caixia Guo. The characteristics of desert vegetation biomass and its influencing factors in the middle reaches of the Heihe River [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 203-208.
[7]	Liuwen Dong, Jialong Han, Wenzhi Zhao, Jiliang Liu, Yibin Ba. Comparison of ground arthropod community between Lake Wetland and adjacent sand dune in Heihe River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(6): 250-258.
[8]	Yabin Chang, Rui Zhu, Shengchun Xiao, Yapei Li. Sandy land change from 1980 to 2015 in Alxa League， China and its driving factors [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(6): 82-90.
[9]	Xiaobo Wang. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity at village scale in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 32-41.
[10]	Su Langga, Tian Guiquan, Hong Xia. Diversity of bryophyte in Hunshandake Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(3): 51-59.
[11]	Wang Yu, Liu Juanjuan, Feng Qi, Liu Xiande, Wang Zhijun, Guo Yamin, Kong Dexing. Community structure and biodiversity of zoobenthos in Heihe River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 125-135.
[12]	Cheng Qingping, Zhong Fanglei, Zuo Xiaoan, Yang Chunlin. Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity of Heihe River Basin Combining Beautiful China with SDGs [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 204-214.
[13]	Zhang Rui, Zhao Xueyong, Zuo Xiaoan, Liu Xinping, Qu Hao, Ma Xujun, Liu Liangxu, Chen Juanli, Liu Liping. Responses of the Stipa glareosa Community Species Diversity and Above-ground Biomass to Precipitation in the Desert-steppe Region in Northern China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(2): 45-52.
[14]	Ma Junmei, Man Duoqing, Li Delu, Liu Youjun, Guo Chunxiu. Characteristics of Vegetation Succession and Soil Moisture in Abandoned Cropland of Arid Desert Region [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(4): 800-807.
[15]	Luo Weicheng, Zhao Wenzhi, Sun Chengpeng, Yan Jialiang. Changes in Species Composition, Diversity and Soil Water Content of Pinus sylvestris Artificial Sand-fixation Forest along An Afforestation Successional Gradient in Horqin [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2018, 38(1): 126-132.

Responses of plant species diversity to land use change： a case study in the Heihe River Basin

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 58

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments