Variation of the Baseflow and Its Causes of Hutubi River

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00067

JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 793-801.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00067

Previous Articles Next Articles

Variation of the Baseflow and Its Causes of Hutubi River

Wang Jinzhe^1,2, Liu Zhihui^1,3,4, Tashpolat·Tiyip^1,2, Zhang Wenna⁵

1. School of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Ministry of Education, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
3. Institute of Arid Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
4. International Center for Desert Affairs-Research on Sustainable Development in Arid and Semi-arid Lands, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;
5. Xinjiang Environmental Monitoring Centre, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2016-03-28 Revised:2016-05-19 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-07-20

Abstract

Abstract: Based on daily runoff data of Hutubi River Shimen station,the smoothed minimum method and recursive digital filter were used for base flow separation,the recursive digital filter and smoothed minimum method were used for base flow separation.Annual and interannual variations in baseflow,baseflow index (BFI),and the variations in BFI for different water level years in Hutubi River basin as well as the main controlling factors (temperature and precipitation) were investigated in different time scales.It is found that the smoothed minimum method is more suitable than recursive digital filter in the study area.Annual distribution of baseflow is in unimodal type,with the maximum value appearing in July,the BFI distribution in a year,with the minimum BFI value in May.BFI is close to 1 in dry year.The average annual base flow is 3.67×10⁸ m³.The base flow is increasing in the Hutubi river.The base flow index is 0.78 in the study area,it is in slowly decreasing trend.Averaged BFI from the smoothed minimum method in dry years,average years,and wet years were 0.78,0.76 and 0.74,respectively.Temperature and precipitation are two important factors,and their importance to baseflow varies with seasons in different water level years.The results implied that the effect of temperature on baseflow was higher than that of precipitation in spring and autumn.Temperature plays a leading role in the effects on baseflow in spring and autumn,and temperature is a key affecting factor on baseflow of Hutubi River.

Key words: baseflow, base flow index, smoothed minimum method, Hutubi River, Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains, climate change

CLC Number:

TV121

Wang Jinzhe, Liu Zhihui, Tashpolat·Tiyip, Zhang Wenna. Variation of the Baseflow and Its Causes of Hutubi River[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(4): 793-801.

References

[1] 党素珍,王中根,刘昌明.黑河上游地区基流分割及其变化特征分析[J].资源科学,2011,33(12):2232-2237.
[2] Mwakalila S,Feyen J,Wyseure G.The influence of physical catchment properties on baseflow in semi-arid environments[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2002,52(2):245-258.
[3] Eckhardt K.A comparison of baseflow indices,which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,352(1):168-173.
[4] 陈利群,刘昌明,李发东.基流研究综述[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(1):1-15.
[5] 雷泳南,张晓萍,张建军,等.窟野河流域河川基流量变化趋势及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):1559-1568.
[6] Abdulla F A,Lettenmaier D P,Liang X.Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data[J].Journal of Hydrology,1999,222(1):37-54.
[7] 刘希胜,李其江,段水强,等.黄河源径流演变特征及其对降水的响应[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1721-1730.
[8] 陈利群,刘昌明,杨聪,等.黄河源区基流估算[J].地理研究,2006,25(4):659-665.
[9] 林凯荣,张文华,郭生练.流量过程线分割的新方法——应用分析[J].水文,2006,26(4):15-20.
[10] 熊立华,郭生练.采用非线性水库假设的基流分割方法及应用[J].武汉大学学报:工学版,2005,38(1):27-29.
[11] 李成六.基于SWAT模型的石羊河流域上游山区径流模拟研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2011.
[12] 程磊,徐宗学,罗睿,等.SWAT在干旱半干旱地区的应用——以窟野河流域为例[J].地理研究,2009(1):65-73.
[13] 李姝蕾,鲁程鹏,李伟,等.长江螺山站50年来基流演变趋势分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,25(5):128-131.
[14] 豆林,黄明斌.自动基流分割方法在黄土区流域的应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):107-111.
[15] 张文娜,刘志辉,王荣军,等.数字滤波法在天山北坡军塘湖河流域流量基流分割中的应用[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(1):35-39.
[16] 黄国如.流量过程线的自动分割方法探讨[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(1):73-78.
[17] 林凯荣,陈晓宏,江涛,等.数字滤波进行基流分割的应用研究[J].水力发电,2008,34(6):28-30.
[18] 崔玉洁,刘德富,宋林旭,等.数字滤波法在三峡库区香溪河流域基流分割中的应用[J].水文,2011,31(6):18-23.
[19] 张革,刘德富,宋林旭,等.不同基流分割方法在香溪河流域的应用对比研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(2):164-171.
[20] Vogel R M,Kroll C N.Estimation of baseflow recession constants[J].Water Resources Management,1996,10(4):303-320.
[21] Arnold J G,Muttiah R S,Srinivasan R,et al.Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2000,227(1):21-40.
[22] Smettem K,Underwood S,Callow N.Impacts of land use and climate change on baseflow in catchments along the south coast of Western Australia[C].EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts.2014,16:3187.
[23] 白乐,李怀恩,何宏谋.降水和人类活动对秃尾河流域基流的影响[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2078-2088.
[24] 陈利群,刘昌明,郝芳华,等.黄河源区基流变化及影响因子分析[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(2):141-148.
[25] 董薇薇,丁永建,魏霞.祁连山疏勒河上游基流变化及其影响因素分析[J].冰川冻土,2014,36(3):661-669.
[26] 王敬哲,刘志辉,姚俊强,等.呼图壁河水沙年内分配特征及同步性变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):152-157.
[27] 耿峻岭,高玲,陈建江,等.新疆呼图壁河流域水文特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(3):371-376.
[28] 聂敏,刘志辉,刘洋,等.基于PCA和BP神经网络的径流预测[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(4):1144-1152.
[29] Nathan R J,Mc Mahon T A.Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses[J].Water Resources Research,1990,26:1465-1473.
[30] Aksoy H,Kurt I,Eris E.Filtered smoothed minima baseflow separation method[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,372(1):94-101.
[31] 董晓华,邓霞,薄会娟,等.平滑最小值法与数字滤波法在流域径流分割中的应用比较[J].三峡大学学报:自然科学版,2010,32(2):1-4.

Variation of the Baseflow and Its Causes of Hutubi River

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Yuanzheng He, Wenda Huang, Xin Zhao, Peng Lv, Huaihai Wang. Review on the impact of climate change on plant diversity [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 59-66.
[2]	Di Deng, Zebin Zhao, Yuan Ma. Modeling of species distribution with GIS in arid regions： take Caragana korshinskii for example [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 74-80.
[3]	Han Chao, Xiao Shengchun, Ding Aijun, Teng Zeyu. Radial growth climatic response characteristics and tree ring climate records of conifer species at south margin of Tengger Desert, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 50-58.
[4]	Li Xiang, Su Zhizhu, Ma Yijuan, Zhang Caixia, Liu Miaomiao. Holocene climatic instability record in the southeastern margin of Mu Us Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 109-117.
[5]	Zhao Zefang, Wei Haiyan, Guo Yanlong, Luan Wenfei, Zhao Zebin. Impact of climate change on the suitable habitatdistribution of Gymnocarpos przewalskii, a relict plant [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 125-133.
[6]	Chang Xi, Lu Huayu, Lü Nana, Cui Mengchun, Li Haiyu. Variation of desert and sandy field in China on the basis of remote sensing analysis and the relationship with climate change during 1992-2015 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 57-63.
[7]	Ma Qimin, Jia Xiaopeng, Wang Haibing, Li Yongshan, Li Shaoning. Recent Advances in Driving Mechanisms of Climate and Anthropogenic Factors on Vegetation Change [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 48-55.
[8]	Liu Liyun, Lu Ruijie, Liu Xiaokang. Climate Change in the Mu Us Desert since Holocene Based on Soil Chromaticity [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 83-89.
[9]	Lei Chen, Pang Jiangli, Huang Chunchang, Zha Xiaochun, Zhou Yali, Wen Ruiyan, Chui Yuda. Composition Characteristics and Significance of Rb, Sr and Ba of Fanjiacheng Loess-paleosol Profile in the Upper Reaches of the Weihe River [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 90-98.
[10]	Ma Pengli, Han Lanying, Zhang Xudong, Liu Weiping. Regional Characteristics of Drought in China under the Background of Climate Warming [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(6): 209-215.
[11]	Han Lanying, Zhang Qiang, Jia Jianying, Wang Youheng, Huang Tao. Drought Severity, Frequency, Duration and Regional Differences in China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(5): 1-10.
[12]	Han Rui, Su Zhizhu, Li Xiang, Liu Miaomiao, Ma Yijuan. Holocene Climate Change Revealed by Grain Size and Magnetic Susceptibility in the Eastern Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(2): 105-114.
[13]	Bai Zhuangzhuang, Cui Jianxin. Desertification and Its Causes in Mu Us Desert in Recent 2 000 Years [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(2): 177-185.
[14]	Chang Hong, Liu Tong, Wang Dawei, Ji Xiaoru. Haloxylon ammodendron's Potential Distribution under Climate Change in Arid Areas of Northwest China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(1): 110-118.
[15]	Zhang Fuping, Li Xiaojuan, Feng Qi, Wang Huwei, Wei Yongfen, Bai Hao. Spatial and Temporal Variation of Water Conservation in the Upper Reaches of Heihe River Basin Based on InVEST Model [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(6): 1321-1329.