Characteristics of changes in soil components and trace element contents during the reversal of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00059

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 218-227.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00059

Previous Articles Next Articles

Characteristics of changes in soil components and trace element contents during the reversal of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land

Jiaxin Feng(), Yueru Wu(), Shuo Qiao, Xiya Liu, Haibing Wang

Key Laboratory of Wind and Sand Physics and Sand Control Engineering，College of Desert Management，Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，Hohhot 010018，China

Received:2023-01-30 Revised:2023-05-24 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2023-12-26
Contact: Yueru Wu

Abstract

Abstract:

By constructing the DDI of desertification index in Mu Us Sandy Land in 2021 by remote sensing interpretation， and classifying the land in Mu Us Sandy Land into five desertification types according to the natural fracture method， namely non-， light， moderate， heavy and very heavy desertification， representing different stages of desertification reversal， and applying the spatial instead of temporal method to collect samples and conduct laboratory analysis on different desertification types of soils according to the inversion results. In order to reveal the process of reversal of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land and its effects on soil components and effective state Cu， Fe， Mn and Zn contents. The results show that the desertification of the Mu Us Sandy Land reverses from 1986 to 2021， and the desertified land area shrinks from 47 877.81 km² in 1986 to 45 914.06 km² in 2021， with a reversal rate of 56.11 km² per year， and the implementation of a series of projects is effective in rebuilding the ecosystem of the Mu Us Sandy Land； as the desertification decreases， the soil particle size fraction the process of reversal of desertification is essentially the process of soil fine-grained and enrichment of trace elements； due to the unevenness of the implemented projects， the degree of reversal of Mu Us Sandy Land has been different since 1980， and the representative areas with significant reversal of desertification are Zhaoshao Township in Ertok Banner， Garutu Sumu in Uttarakhand Banner， and Taig Sumu in Ijinholo Banner， whose soil clay particles， powder particles and effective Cu， Mn and Zn increased significantly， and the content of soil sand grain and effective Fe decreased significantly. Obviously， the reversal process of desertification in the Mu Us Sandy Land has resulted in a finer soil structure and a significant improvement in soil quality.

Key words: desertification reversal, soil fraction, trace elements, Mu Us Sandy Land

CLC Number:

S157

Jiaxin Feng, Yueru Wu, Shuo Qiao, Xiya Liu, Haibing Wang. Characteristics of changes in soil components and trace element contents during the reversal of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(1): 218-227.

Figures/Tables 10

References 36

1	王永芳，张继权，马齐云，等.21世纪初科尔沁沙地沙漠化对区域气候变化的响应［J］.农业工程学报，2016，32（）：177-185.
2	Lan S， Zhang Q， Li W，et al.Artificially accelerating the reversal of desertification：cyanobacterial inoculation facilitates the succession of vegetation communities［J］.Environmental Science & Technology，2014，48（1）：307-315.
3	南富森，李宗省，张小平，等.黄河北岸兰州段荒漠-草原过渡带土壤粒径分形特征［J］.地球科学，2023，48（3）：1195-1204.
4	陈超，杨丰，刘洪来，等.贵州喀斯特地区草地开垦对土壤微量元素的影响与评价［J］.农业工程学报，2013，29（7）：230-237.
5	严连香，黄标，邵学新，等.长江三角洲典型地区土壤有效铜和锌的时空变化及其影响因素研究［J］.土壤通报，2007，38（5）：971-977.
6	陈小红，段争虎，雒天峰，等.沙漠化逆转对表土颗粒组分中有机碳和养分分配的影响：以宁夏盐池县为例［J］.土壤通报，2014，45（6）：1416-1423.
7	李尝君，曾凡江，郭京衡，等.植被恢复程度与沙地土壤性质：以塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘为例［J］.干旱区研究，2015，32（6）：1061-1067.
8	李光仁，徐丽恒，宋一诚.干旱区沙漠化逆转过程土壤矿质元素的变化特征［J］.中国农学通报，2009，25（19）：287-290.
9	Zhang J.Changes in soil properties during reversal of desertification in agro-pastoral transition zone of Northern China［J］.African Journal of Agricultural Reseearch，2012，7（22）：10.5897/AJAR11.1863.
10	Wang L J， Sheng M Y， Li S，et al.Patterns and Dynamics of Plant Diversity and Soil Physical-Chemical Properties of the Karst Rocky Desertification Ecosystem，SW China［J］.Polish Journal of Environmental Studies，2021，30（2）：1393-1408.
11	闫蒙，王旭洋，周立业，等.科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程中土壤有机碳含量变化特征及影响因素［J］.中国沙漠，2022，42（5）：221-231.
12	Qiu K Y， Xie Y Z， Xu D M，et al.Ecosystem functions including soil organic carbon， total nitrogen and available potassium are crucial for vegetation recovery［J］.Scientific Reports，2018，8（1）：135-146.
13	马建业，佟小刚，李占斌，等.毛乌素沙地沙漠化逆转过程土壤颗粒固碳效应［J］.应用生态学报，2016，27（11）：3487-3494.
14	钱洲，俞元春，俞小鹏，等.毛乌素沙地飞播造林植被恢复特征及土壤性质变化［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2014，34（4）：102-107.
15	李晓岚.毛乌素沙地沙漠化逆转过程及成因分析［D］.西安：陕西师范大学，2017.
16	任余艳，郑玉峰，张彦东，等.毛乌素沙地库伦生态经济圈可持续性评价［J］.中国沙漠，2022，42（4）：1-9.
17	陈闻.毛乌素沙地不同人工植被措施对土壤性质的影响［D］.陕西杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2021.
18	何晨晨，吴盈盈，王振亭.土壤团聚体与地面碰撞时的临界破碎速度与粒径分布［J］.中国沙漠，2023，43（5）：1-8.
19	王涛，吴薇，薛娴.近50年来中国北方沙漠化土地的时空变化［J］.地理学报，2004（2）：203-212.
20	邹明亮，韩雅敏，曾建军，等.基于Albedo-NDVI特征空间的玛曲县荒漠化时空动态监测［J］.冰川冻土，2019，41（1）：45-53.
21	毋兆鹏，王明霞，赵晓.精河流域1990-2011年土地荒漠化变化研究［J］.干旱区资源与环境，2015，29（1）：192-197.
22	张连伟，郎洁，李莉.中国古代沙质荒漠化的历史演变［J］.干旱区地理，2018，41（6）：1270-1277.
23	刘爱民，刘玉平，慈龙骏.毛乌素沙区的气候变化及人为活动特征分析［J］.干旱区资源与环境，1996，20（4）：8-18.
24	高尚武.西北水土资源开发要遵守自然规律［J］.林业科学，2000（5）：6-7.
25	王岳，刘学敏，哈斯额尔敦.荒漠化治理“经济-生态-社会”效益耦合协调度时空分异及其驱动因素：以毛乌素沙地为例［J］.资源科学，2022，44（6）：1224-1237.
26	哈斯尔.毛乌素沙地沙漠化逆转过程土壤固定碳氮效应与机制［D］.陕西杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2019.
27	Tang Z S， An H， Shangguan Z P.The impact of desertification on carbon and nitrogen storage in the desert steppe ecosystem［J］.Ecological Engineering，2015，84：92-99.
28	刘树林，王涛，屈建军.浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化过程中土壤粒度与养分变化研究［J］.中国沙漠，2008，28（4）：611-616.
29	张成霞，南志标.不同放牧强度下陇东天然草地土壤微生物三大类群的动态特征［J］.草业科学，2010，27（11）：131-136.
30	Li Y， Zhao H， Zhao X，et al.Effects of grazing and livestock exclusion on soil physical and chemical properties in desertified sandy grassland，Inner Mongolia，northern China［J］.Environmental Geology，2011，63（4）：771-783.
31	刘强，杨东.不同土壤类型有效微量元素的空间特征：以张掖市临泽县为例［J］.水土保持研究，2017，24（6）：205-208.
32	胡厚军，万松华，何晓燕，等.浅析影响土壤铜铁锰锌钼有效性的因素［J］.农业与技术，2014，34（2）：23-24.
33	赵啸龙，谢玉鸿，马旭君，等.科尔沁沙质草地不同恢复年限草本层群落结构及其与土壤理化性质的关系［J］.中国沙漠， 2022，42（2）：134-141.
34	季方，樊自立，赵虎.塔里木盆地冲积新成土土壤质地对土壤性状的影响［J］.土壤，1999（3）：15-20.
35	李金婵，陈秀玲，贾丽敏，等.新疆伊犁河谷沙漠沉积不同粒径组分的地球化学元素分布特征［J］.地球环境学报，2014，5（2）：102-110.
36	张建鹏，李玉强，赵学勇，等.围封对沙漠化草地土壤理化性质和固碳潜力恢复的影响［J］.中国沙漠，2017，37（3）：491-499.

沙漠化类型	沙漠化差值指数DDI
非沙漠化	>7.0
轻度沙漠化	7.0~5.2
中度沙漠化	5.2~4.9
重度沙漠化	4.9~4.6
极重度沙漠化	<4.6

沙漠化类型	沙漠化差值指数DDI
非沙漠化	>7.0
轻度沙漠化	7.0~5.2
中度沙漠化	5.2~4.9
重度沙漠化	4.9~4.6
极重度沙漠化	<4.6

年份	沙漠化程度
年份	非沙漠化	轻度	中度	重度	极重度
1986	429.92	20 111.94	13 861.67	11 541.03	2 363.17
1991	427.90	19 362.10	14 355.57	11 976.67	2 185.49
1996	349.65	15 777.05	16 878.43	13 083.41	2 219.22
2001	325.65	13 786.25	18 347.01	13 526.81	2 322.01
2006	713.91	27 806.30	13 319.54	5 300.07	1 167.91
2011	1 368.42	32 070.21	12 531.72	1 761.29	576.09
2016	1 610.28	36 556.73	8 310.04	1 464.09	366.59
2021	1 893.67	38 206.06	6 494.99	1 027.12	185.89

年份	沙漠化程度
年份	非沙漠化	轻度	中度	重度	极重度
1986	429.92	20 111.94	13 861.67	11 541.03	2 363.17
1991	427.90	19 362.10	14 355.57	11 976.67	2 185.49
1996	349.65	15 777.05	16 878.43	13 083.41	2 219.22
2001	325.65	13 786.25	18 347.01	13 526.81	2 322.01
2006	713.91	27 806.30	13 319.54	5 300.07	1 167.91
2011	1 368.42	32 070.21	12 531.72	1 761.29	576.09
2016	1 610.28	36 556.73	8 310.04	1 464.09	366.59
2021	1 893.67	38 206.06	6 494.99	1 027.12	185.89

年份	土壤黏粒/%	土壤粉粒/%	土壤砂粒/%	有效态Cu/(mg·kg^-1)	有效态Fe/(mg·kg^-1)	有效态Mn/(mg·kg^-1)	有效态Zn/(mg·kg^-1)
1986	3.42	6.52	90.06	0.15	4.36	4.13	0.52
1991	3.22	6.04	90.85	0.13	4.48	4.01	0.50
1996	3.14	5.72	91.27	0.11	4.57	3.88	0.48
2001	3.01	4.57	92.42	0.09	4.71	3.64	0.45
2006	4.48	9.15	88.83	0.18	4.24	6.55	0.77
2011	5.79	14.97	79.24	0.24	4.15	6.94	0.81
2016	6.13	16.37	75.53	0.28	4.07	7.11	0.85
2021	6.88	20.21	72.91	0.30	3.93	7.37	0.91

Characteristics of changes in soil components and trace element contents during the reversal of desertification in Mu Us Sandy Land

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

旗	苏木（乡、镇）	沙漠化差值指数	土壤黏粒/%	土壤粉粒/%	土壤砂粒/%	有效态Cu/（mg·kg^-1）	有效态Fe/（mg·kg^-1）	有效态Mn/（mg·kg^-1）	有效态Zn/（mg·kg^-1）
鄂托克前旗	吉拉苏木	0.13	3.46	10.38	-3.51	0.07	-1.37	1.24	0.31
	敖勒召其镇	0.22	5.57	11.22	-5.81	0.11	-1.11	2.08	0.58
	毛盖图苏木	0.34	6.08	13.57	-6.04	0.09	-0.98	1,73	0.54
鄂托克旗	苏米图苏木	0.27	5.99	14.33	-7.56	0.14	-1.14	2.67	0.62
	察汗淖尔苏木	0.36	6.13	13.70	-8.83	0.17	-1.04	3.74	0.67
	召稍乡	0.58	10.45	25.74	-19.33	0.29	-3.88	5.68	0.73
乌审旗	河南乡	0.39	6.28	12.05	-6.98	0.13	-1.36	3.55	0.41
	嘎鲁图苏木	0.52	10.37	27.83	-20.26	0.30	-3.02	5.71	0.70
	乌审召苏木	0.27	5.02	15.01	-5.03	0.14	-1.22	2.86	0.47
	乌兰陶勒盖镇	0.25	5.44	15.74	-4.58	0.11	-1.34	2.99	0.42
	乌兰什巴台乡	0.30	5.38	14.21	-4.27	0.12	-1.17	2.47	0.44
伊金霍洛旗	台格苏木	0.63	11.25	28.07	-18.83	0.29	-3.46	5.55	0.78
	红庆河镇	0.44	8.87	20.36	-11.27	0.21	-2.04	4.37	0.58
	伊金霍洛镇	0.45	9.01	19.94	-12.73	0.18	-2.24	4.11	0.51
	布尔台格乡	0.39	8.41	18.87	-12.06	0.17	-2.17	4.51	0.49

[1]	Xiao Feng, Jianjun Qu, Xinhui Ding, Qin Tian, Qingbin Fan. Temporal and spatial pattern of NPP in Yulin and its influencing factors during the desertification reversal [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(1): 22-32.
[2]	Rongrong Wang, Jin Fan, Shixiang Cong, Hailong Yu, Juying Huang. Enzyme activity characteristics and their influencing factors of different biocrusts around thermal plant in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 209-219.
[3]	Guangyu Hong, Xiaojiang Wang, Qingpu Su, Long Hai, Shaokun Wang, Xiaowei Gao, Yanyan Xu, Jingshan Zhou, Zhuofan Li, Zihao Li, Ercha Hu. Simulation of soil moisture and leakage characteristics of mobile dunes in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 288-298.
[4]	Xuying Bai, Yujie Wang, Yunqi Wang, Wenbin Yang, Tao Wang, Yiben Cheng. Changes and driving factors of water body area in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 65-73.
[5]	Yuzhe Yang, Dapeng Yue, Jingbo Zhao, Yiting Liu, Jianing Li, Tianyu Yang. Chroma characteristics and its paleoclimatic significance of L₃ and S₃ loess-paleosol in the southeast margin of Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 176-186.
[6]	Hongmei Liu, Haibing Wang, Kuan Li, Xiya Liu, Yuyan Ren, Yandong Zhang. Structure， benefits and behavior of farmers and herdsmen of the Kulun ecological economic circle in Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 48-57.
[7]	Xiaohan Chen, Yongsheng Wu, Chunxing Hai. Effects of surface dew under different types of sand-fixing shrubs in the southern margin of Mu Us Sandy Land， Northern China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 83-95.
[8]	Guangyu Hong, Xiaojiang Wang, Tieshan Liu, Hailong, Zhenting Wu, Huercha, Xiaowei Gao, Haifeng Yang, Zhuofan Li, Zihao Li, Siqin, Lejun Wang. Applicability of Hydrus-*1D Model in simulating the soil moisture in Hedysarum leave* in Mu Us Sandy Land， China** [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 233-242.
[9]	Lixia Gu, Ping Lv, Fang Ma, Guoxiang Chen, Zhun Liang, Mingjing Xu, Ying Yang. Drift potential characteristics of Mu Us Sandy Land calculated with different data sources [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 54-62.
[10]	Xinying Liu, Ming Jin, Fan Yang, Yapeng Ma, Hui Liu, Xiaoyun Sun, Dunsheng Xia. A preliminary study of environmental changes since middle Holocene and its impacts on the evolution of civilization in the eastern Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 92-100.
[11]	Min Chen, Baosheng Li, Fengnian Wang, Dongfeng Niu, Xiaohao Wen, Peixian Shu, Yuejun Si, Qinjiang Yang, Chen Wang. High-resolution monsoonal environment change in MIS3 based on trace elements in the Tumen Section on the southweest edge of Tegger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 253-263.
[12]	Yuyan Ren, Yufeng Zheng, Yandong Zhang, Haibing Wang, Shiqiang Wang, Jinjun He. Evaluation on development sustainability of kulun eco-economic circle in the Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 264-272.
[13]	Honglin Lian, Xueying Han, Yali Liu, Yuqing Han, Wenbin Yang, Wei Xiong. Study on spatiotemporal characteristics of atmospheric drought from 1981 to 2020 in the Mu Us Sandy Land of China based on SPEI index [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 71-80.
[14]	Shuo Qiao, Haibing Wang, Hejun Zuo, Xiya Liu, Yueru Wu. Evolution of ecological service value and network pattern of Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 118-126.
[15]	Ming Yan, Yinghua Zhang, Li He, Weiming Cheng, Suiji Wang, Jiongxin Xu. Blocking effect of upper reaches of Wuding River on desertification [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(2): 62-68.