围封对沙漠化草地土壤理化性质和固碳潜力恢复的影响

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00169

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 过度放牧是科尔沁沙地退化的主要原因，禁牧围封可以有效地控制牲畜对植被-土壤系统的破坏，促进退化生态系统的有效恢复。以过度放牧后的沙漠化草地为对象，调查了禁牧围封13年后沙漠化草地土壤理化性质的变化特征，并分析了围封对土壤固碳潜力的影响。结果表明：（1）沙漠化草地围封13年后，土壤砂粒含量减少、粉粒和黏粒含量增加，且粉粒增加最为明显，平均含量增加123%；土壤容重在不同土壤深度均呈下降趋势。（2）围封后土壤有机质、全氮、速效氮和速效钾含量呈增加趋势，分别增加了102%、97%、123%和24%，但土壤有效磷和缓效钾呈减少趋势；土壤pH显著升高，阳离子交换量呈现增加趋势。（3）除土壤有效铁外，其余有效微量元素包括有效铜、有效锰和有效锌平均含量均呈增加趋势，分别增加44%、30%和82%。（4）土壤有机质与pH值、阳离子交换量、全氮、速效氮、速效钾、有效铜、有效锰、有效锌含量呈显著正相关关系。（5）沙漠化草地围封13年后，100 cm深度土壤有机碳储量增加393.45 g·m^-2，碳截存速率为30.27 gC·m^-2·a^-1。对于因持续过度放牧所导致的严重退化草地，禁牧围封可有效促进土壤有机质、养分和微量元素的增加，影响土壤质地及固碳潜力等的变化，但严重退化沙漠化草地的恢复需要一个长期的过程，土壤有机碳储量要恢复到科尔沁非沙漠化草地水平至少需要百年的时间尺度。

关键词: 科尔沁沙地, 禁牧围封, 沙质草地, 土壤理化性质, 固碳潜力

Abstract: Heaving grazing is regarded as one of the main reasons of soil degradation and desertification in the semiarid Horqin sandy grassland of northeastern China. Exclosure can control the destruction of livestock to vegetation-soil system effectively and contribute to improve the restoration of degraded ecological system. Desertified grassland, which was overgrazing, was taken as control for objection. Soil physicochemical properties were examined and analyzed the effect of exclosure on carbon sequestration potential under continuous grazing and exclusion of livestock for 13 years in desertified grassland. It was found that, after exclosure for 13 years, it had lower sand contents and higher silt and clay contents at all depths, especially for silt, which increased by 123%. The soil bulk density was lower at all five depths. Mean soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available N, available K contents increased by 102%, 97%, 123% and 24%, respectively, while available P and slowly available K went down. Soil pH increased significantly. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) went up. Except for available Fe, the mean available Cu, Mn and Zn increased by 44%, 30% and 82%, respectively. Soil organic matter was significantly positively correlated with total N, pH, CEC, available N, K, Cu, Mn, Zn (P<0.05). To a depth of 100 cm, soil carbon stock increased 393.45 g·m^-2 and carbon sequestration rate was 30.27 g C·m^-2·a^-1 after exclosure of desertified grassland for 13 years. The research shows that livestock exclusion can improve soil organic matter, nutrients and microelements and the change of soil texture and carbon sequestration potential. While the recovery of serious desertified grassland needs a long process to be raised, carbon stock is needed to restore the non-desertified grassland standard at least centenary temporal scale.

Key words: Horqin Sandy Land, grazing exclosure, sandy grassland, soil physicochemical properties, carbon sequestration potential

中图分类号:

S154.4

张建鹏, 李玉强, 赵学勇, 张铜会, 佘倩楠, 刘敏, 魏水莲. 围封对沙漠化草地土壤理化性质和固碳潜力恢复的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(3): 491-499.

Zhang Jianpeng, Li Yuqiang, Zhao Xueyong, Zhang Tonghui, She Qiannan, Liu Min, Wei Shuilian. Effects of Exclosure on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Carbon Sequestration Potential Recovery of Desertified Grassland[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(3): 491-499.

参考文献

[1] Walker B,Steffen W.IGBP Science No.1:A synthesis of GCTE and related research[Z].Stockholm,Sweden:IGBP,1997:1-24.
[2] 吴彦,刘庆,乔永康,等.亚高山针叶林不同恢复阶段群落物种多样性变化及其对土壤理化性质的影响[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):648-655.
[3] Yuan J,Ouyang Z,Zheng H,et al.Effects of different grassland restoration approaches on soil properties in the southeastern Horqin sandy land,northern China[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2012,61:34-39.
[4] 张强,赵雪,赵哈林.中国沙区草地[M].北京:气象出版社,1998.
[5] 苏永中,赵哈林.持续放牧和围封对科尔沁退化沙地草地碳截存的影响[J].环境科学,2003,24(4):23-28.
[6] 文海燕,赵哈林,傅华.开垦和封育年限对退化沙质草地土壤性状的影响[J].草业学报,2005,14(1):31-37.
[7] 李洋,严振英,郭丁,等.围封对青海湖流域高寒草甸植被特征和土壤理化性质的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(10):33-39.
[8] 杨勇,刘爱军,李兰花,等.围封对内蒙古典型草原群落特征及土壤性状的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):21-29.
[9] 左万庆,王玉辉,王风玉,等.围栏封育措施对退化羊草草原植物群落特征影响研究[J].草业学报,2009,18(3):12-19.
[10] 王娓,郭继勋.东北松嫩平原羊草群落的土壤呼吸与枯枝落叶分解释放CO₂贡献量[J].生态学报,2002,22(5):655-660.
[11] 邹雨坤,张静妮,杨殿林,等.不同利用方式下羊草草原土壤生态系统微生物群落结构的PLFA分析[J].草业学报,2011,20(4):27-33.
[12] Chen S,Cui X,Zhou G,et al.Study on the CO₂ release rate of soil respiration and litter decomposition in Stipa grandis steppe in Xilin River Basin,Inner Mongolia[J].Acta Botanica Sinica,1999,41(6):645-650.
[13] 赵哈林,李瑾,周瑞莲,等.风沙流持续吹袭对樟子松幼树光合蒸腾作用的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(20):6678-6685.
[14] 赵哈林,李瑾,周瑞莲,等.风沙流频繁吹袭对樟子松幼苗光合水分代谢的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(10):149-156.
[15] Li F,Zhang H,Zhang T,et al.Variations of sand transportation rates in sandy grasslands along a desertification gradient in northern China[J].Catena,2003,53(3):255-272.
[16] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1978.
[17] 程先富,史学正,于东升,等.兴国县森林土壤有机碳库及其与环境因子的关系[J].地理研究,2004,23(2):211-217.
[18] 于贵瑞,王秋凤,刘迎春,等.区域尺度陆地生态系统固碳速率和增汇潜力概念框架及其定量认证科学基础[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(7):771-787.
[19] Rubio J L,Bochet E.Desertification indicators as diagnosis criteria for desertification risk assessment in Europe[J].Journal of Arid Environments,1998,39(2):113-120.
[20] 李玉强,赵哈林,移小勇,等.沙漠化过程中科尔沁沙地植物-土壤系统碳氮储量动态[J].环境科学,2006,27(4):635-640.
[21] 王蕙,王辉,黄蓉,等.不同封育管理对沙质草地土壤与植被特征的影响[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):15-22.
[22] Percival H J,Parfitt R L,Scott N A.factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand grasslands is clay content important?[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2000,64(5):1623-1630.
[23] 贾树海,王春枝,孙振涛,等.放牧强度和时期对内蒙古草原土壤压实效应的研究[J].草地学报,1999,7(3):217-222.
[24] Franzluebbers A,Wright S,Stuedemann J.Soil aggregation and glomalin under pastures in the Southern Piedmont USA[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2000,64(3):1018-1026.
[25] 汪景宽,王铁宇,张旭东,等.黑土土壤质量演变初探 I:不同开垦年限黑土主要质量指标演变规律[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(1):43-47.
[26] 蒋德明,苗仁辉,周全来.封育对科尔沁沙地植被恢复和土壤特性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(1):40-46.
[27] 张玉兰,陈利军.沙漠化逆转过程中土壤性状演变综述[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(7):1440-1450.
[28] 刘任涛,朱凡.人工与自然恢复方式对流动沙地土壤与植被特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(6):1-7.
[29] 李玉强,赵学勇,刘新平,等.樟子松固沙林土壤碳截存及土壤呼吸对干湿变化的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):282-287.
[30] Grandy A S,Robertson G P.Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon accumulation rates and mechanisms[J].Ecosystems,2007,10(1):59-74.
[31] 高亮,高永,王静,等.土地覆盖类型对科尔沁沙地南缘土壤有机碳储量的影响[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(5):1357-1364.