半干旱区采煤塌陷对风蚀影响强度模糊综合评判——以神府-东胜煤田补连塔矿风沙区为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以神府-东胜煤田补连塔矿风沙区为例,通过野外系统观测,以采煤塌陷后1～4 a的塌陷区和对照(非塌陷区)风蚀侵蚀性因子、塌陷地表土壤特征等因素为参评因子,在各因子等级指标划分的基础上,利用模糊数学理论,建立神府-东胜煤田补连塔矿风沙区风蚀强度评价模型。通过该模型运算,结果表明:2005年塌陷区样地(塌陷1 a)风蚀评判综合指数为0.94,属极重度风蚀区;2004年塌陷区样地(塌陷2 a)综合指数为0.7322,属重度风蚀区;2003年塌陷区(塌陷3 a)和2002年塌陷区(塌陷4 a)综合指数分别为0.3881和0.2373,为中度风蚀区;对照 (非塌陷区)样地其综合指数为0.0088,属轻度风蚀区。模型运算结果符合实际,说明以模糊数学理论为基础建立的风蚀强度评价模型可靠、可行,可用于指导实践。

关键词: 半干旱区, 采煤塌陷, 风蚀, 模糊评判, 神府-东胜

Abstract: Systematic field observation about soil wind erosion was conducted in the Bulianta Coal Mine area of Shengfu-Dongsheng coalfield. A evaluation model on wind erosion intensity was established based on the fuzzy mathematic theory. The evaluation indices are comprised of wind erosion factors and surface soil features on areas 1~4 years after subsidence, with no subsidence area as check. Fuzzy assessment results showed that the comprehensive index of wind erosion assessment was 0.94 in area one year after subsidence, being the very severe wind erosion degree; 0.7322 in area two years after subsidence, being the severe wind erosion degree; 0.3881 in area three years and 0.2373 in area four years after subsidence, belong to medium degree. The comprehensive index of wind erosion assessment was 0.0088 in check area, being light wind erosion degree. The simulation results are in accordance with the actual, which proved that the model is reliable and feasible, and can be used to guide practice.

Key words: The semi-arid area, subsidence area, wind erosion, Fuzzy assessment

中图分类号:

S157

赵国平;左合君;封斌*;胡春元;张继平;施智宝. 半干旱区采煤塌陷对风蚀影响强度模糊综合评判——以神府-东胜煤田补连塔矿风沙区为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(6): 1069-1074.

ZHAO Guo-ping;ZUO He-jun;FENG Bing;HU Chun-yuan;ZHANG Ji-ping;SHI Zhi-bao. Fuzzy Assessment on Wind Erosion of Subsidence Area Induced by Coal Mining in Semi-arid Area: A case study in Bulianta Mine area of Shenfu-Dongsheng Coalfield[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2009, 29(6): 1069-1074.

参考文献

[1]张发旺,赵红梅,宋亚新,等.神府东胜矿区采煤塌陷对水环境影响效应研究[J].地球学报,2007,28(6):521-527.
[2]傅耀军,李曦滨,孙占起,等.晋陕蒙能源基地榆神府矿区水土流失综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):32-35.
[3]赵国平,左合君,胡春元,等.神府-东胜煤田采煤塌陷区塌陷强度与风沙蚀积量相关分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(6):176-179.
[4]赵国平.采煤塌陷对风蚀的影响研究—\_以神府-东胜煤田补连塔矿风沙区为例[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2007:20-66.
[5]范锦龙,潘志华,赵举,等.风蚀强度的空间差异及影响分析[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):100-102,316.
[6]董治宝.中国风沙物理研究五十年(Ⅰ)[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):293-305.
[7]董治宝,郑晓静.中国风沙物理研究50 a(Ⅱ)[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(6):795-815.
[8]董治宝,罗万银.风沙床面颗粒起动临界受力平衡模型的对比分析[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(3):356-361.
[9]曹振,胡克,张永光,等.科尔沁沙地地表沉积物粒度分析与可风蚀性讨论[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):15-19.
[10]吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:165-207.
[11]陈守煜.区域水资源可持续利用评价理论模型与方法[J].中国工程科学,2001,3(2):33-38.
[12]谢小良.基于模糊综合评判下的决策模型[J].统计与决策,2005(11):57-58.
[13]Lowdermilk W C.Forest destruction and slope denudation in the province of Shanxi[J].China J Se and Arts,1926,4(3):127-135.
[14]Crossey G B.Chinese eolonization in Mongolia[J].New York:Pioneer Settlment,1931:279-287.
[15]Thorp J.Colonization possibilities of North China and Inner Mongolia[J].Pacific Atfairs,1935,8:447-453.
[16]Moyer T R.The aridity of North China[M].Br Asia Soc,1932,18:65-80.
[17]Fryear D W,Bilbro J D.RWEQ:改进后的风蚀预测模型(一)[J].水土保持科技情报,2001,21(2):20-28.
[18]Fryear D W,Bilbro J D.RWEQ:改进后的风蚀预测模型(二)[J].水土保持科技情报,2001,21(3):22-23.