造林对沙地土壤微生物的数量、生物量碳及酶活性的影响

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00072

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对科尔沁沙地流动沙丘中林龄为20年左右的樟子松（Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica）和小叶杨（Populus simonii）人工林表层土壤微生物数量、微生物生物量碳和酶活性进行了研究,流动沙丘作为对照。研究表明:樟子松和小叶杨人工林可以显著改善流动沙丘土壤性状,对沙丘土壤微生物活性具有显著的促进作用；土壤微生物数量、微生物生物量碳和酶活性均表现为小叶杨林>樟子松林>流动沙丘。樟子松和小叶杨林地土壤微生物总数分别是对照的50.16倍和72.48倍,三者差异显著；樟子松和小叶杨林地土壤微生物生物量碳分别是对照的23.67倍和33.34倍,林地与对照差异显著；两种林地土壤脱氢酶、过氧化物酶、蛋白酶、脲酶、纤维素酶活性分别是对照的19.00倍和27.54倍、4.78倍和9.89倍、4.05倍和8.67倍、29.93倍和37.46倍、9.66倍和13.42倍,林地与对照差异显著。在科尔沁沙地,人工种植适合当地气候特点的乔木,不仅可以改善流动沙丘土壤性状和微生物活性,而且还能起到固定流动沙丘的目的,樟子松和小叶杨是当地值得推广种植的防风固沙树种。土壤微生物量商（Cmic∶C）是一个衡量林地土壤稳定性和有效性较好的指标,从林地土壤养分有效性、林木稳定性和可持续性等方面综合考虑,樟子松比小叶杨更具优势。

关键词: 流动沙丘, 樟子松, 小叶杨, 微生物数量, 微生物生物量碳, 土壤酶活性, 科尔沁沙地

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of afforestation on soil microbial abundance, microbial biomass carbon and enzymatic activities in sandy dunes, around 20-year-old Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (PSM) and Populus simonii Carr. (PSC) mature forests were selected in Horqin Sandy Land, and mobile dunes were set as controls (CK). The results showed that PSM and PSC plantation could improve soil physiochemical properties and increase microbiological activities significantly. Soil microbial abundance, microbial biomass carbon and enzymatic activities showed an order of PSC>PSM>CK. Soil total microbial abundance in PSM and PSC were 50.16 and 72.48 times of that in CK, and the differences were significant among PSM, PSC and CK. Soil microbial biomass carbon in PSM and PSC were 23.67 and 33.34 times of that in CK, and the difference was insignificant between PSM and PSC. Soil enzymatic activities, including dehydrogenase (DEH), peroxidase (PER), protease (PRO), urease (URE) and cellobiohydrolase (CEL) activities in PSM and PSC were 19.00 and 27.54, 4.78 and 9.89, 4.05 and 8.67, 29.93 and 37.46, 9.66 and 13.42 times, repectively, of that in CK. Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Populus simonii Carr. are both efficient tree species to improve soil physiochemical and microbiological properties in sandy land, and moreover, they are both efficient tree species to fix mobile dunes in Horqin Sandy Land. Cmic∶C ratio is an efficient indicator to estimate soil stability and availability, and based on an overall consideration of plantation stability and sustainability, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica was better than Populus simonii Carr. to fix mobile dunes in sandy land.

Key words: mobile dune, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, Populus simonii, microbial abundance, microbial biomass carbon, soil enzymatic activities, Horqin Sandy Land

中图分类号:

S154.36

王少昆, 赵学勇, 张铜会, 李玉强, 连杰, 黄文达, 云建英. 造林对沙地土壤微生物的数量、生物量碳及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(2): 529-535.

WANG Shao-kun, ZHAO Xue-yong, ZHANG Tong-hui, LI Yu-qiang, LIAN Jie, HUANG Wen-da, YUN Jian-ying. Effects of Afforestation on the Abundance, Biomass Carbon and Enzymatic Activities of Soil Microorganism in Sandy Dunes[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(2): 529-535.

参考文献

[1]王涛,吴薇,薛娴,等.近50年来中国北方沙漠化土地的时空变化[J].地理学报,2004, 59(2):203-212.

[2]赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会.科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程及其恢复机理[M].北京:海洋出版社,2003.

[3]Zhao X Y,Luo Y Y,Wang S K,et al.Is the desertification reversion sustainable in Northern China?—A case study in Naiman County,part of typical agro-pastroral transitional zone in Inner Mongolia,China[J].Global Environmental Research,2010,14:95-101.

[4]焦树仁.科尔沁沙地枝叶树造林技术研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2011,3:31-36.

[5]移小勇,赵哈林,崔建垣,等.科尔沁沙地不同密度（小面积）樟子松人工林生长状况[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1200-1206.

[6]胡振华,王电龙,胡起跃.雁北沙地樟子松、油松和小叶杨生长规律及蒸腾特性研究[J].山西农业大学学报（自然科学版）,2007,27(3):245-249.

[7]曾德慧,姜凤岐,范志平,等.樟子松人工固沙林稳定性的研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):337-343.

[8]姜丽娜,杨文斌,姚云峰,等.樟子松固沙林带间植被恢复及其对林草界面作用的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):372-378.

[9]郭然,王效科,刘康,等.樟子松林下土壤有机碳和全氮储量研究[J].土壤,2004,36(2):192-196.

[10]郭轶瑞,赵哈林,赵学勇,等.科尔沁沙地人工林下结皮发育对表土特性影响的研究[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(6):1000-1006.

[11]黄刚,赵学勇,苏延桂,等.科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林对微环境改良效果的评价[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(2):212-218.

[12]李玉强,赵学勇,刘新平,等.樟子松固沙林地土壤碳截存及土壤呼吸对干湿变化的响应[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(2):282-287.

[13]Pajares S,Gallardo J F,Masciandaro G,et al.Enzyme activity as an indicator of soil quality changes in degraded cultivated Acrisols in the Mexican trans-volcanic belt[J].Land Degradation & Development,2010,22:373-381.

[14]刘艳梅,李新荣,何明珠,等.生物土壤结皮对土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(3):669-673.

[15]靳正忠,雷加强,徐新文,等.流沙区不同立地条件下防护林土壤微生物多样性分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1430-1436.

[16]李阜棣.土壤微生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996.

[17]Jia G M,Liu B R,Wang G,et al.The microbial biomass and activity in soil with shrub (Caragana korshinskii K.) plantation in the semi-arid loess plateau in China[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2010,46:6-10.

[18]Burns R G.Soil enzymes[M].New York:Academic Press,1978.

[19]刘新民,赵哈林,赵爱芬.科尔沁沙地风沙环境与植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.

[20]许光辉,郑洪元.土壤微生物分析方法手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.

[21]Vance E D,Brookes P C,Jenkinson D S.An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass C[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1987,19:703-707.

[22]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.

[23]姚槐应,黄昌勇.土壤微生物生态学及其实验技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.

[24]杨涛,徐慧,李慧,等.樟子松人工林土壤养分、微生物及酶活性的研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):50-53.

[25]刘子雄,朱天辉,张建.林木根系分泌物与根际微生物研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(6):25-31.

[26]刘映良,熊应红,谢双喜,等.11年生马尾松土壤微生物区系研究[J].山地农业生物学报,2005,24(3):199-204.

[27]Elemerich C,Kordorosi A,Newton W.Biological Nitrogen Fixation for 21st Century[M].Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1997.

[28]孟宪法,隆小华,康健,等.菊芋内生固氮菌分离、鉴定及特性研究[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):157-163.

[29]王少昆,赵学勇,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地几种灌木对根际微生物的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(5):140-144.

[30]郭继勋,祝庭成.羊草草原土壤微生物的数量和生物量[J].生态学报,1997,17(1):78-82.

[31]王少昆,赵学勇,左小安,等.科尔沁沙地植物萌动期不同类型沙丘土壤微生物区系特征[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):696-670.

[32]Alvear M,Rosas A,Rouanet J L,et al.Effects of three soil tillage systems on some biological activities in an Ultisol from southern Chine[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2005,82:195-202.

[33]Madejón E,Moreno F,Murillo J M,et al.Soil biochemical response to long-term conservation tillage under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2007,94:346-352.

[34]魏天凤,任艳林,曾辉,等.降水改变对樟子松人工林土壤微生物量碳及微生物商动态变化的影响[J].北京大学学报（自然科学版）,2008,4:52-59.

[35]徐淑新,郭笃发,张丽华.刈割对草原生态系统土壤微生物量碳含量及其土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J].环境资源与发展,2010,3:21-23.

[36]常学礼,赵文智.樟子松、小叶杨水分生理及林地水分状况的研究[J].中国沙漠,1990,10(4):18-24.