img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 1998, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 366-371.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

毛乌素沙地草场荒漠化评价的指标体系

刘玉平1,2, 慈龙骏2   

  1. 1. 国家环保信息中心, 北京 100029;
    2. 国家林业局治沙办, 北京 100714
  • 收稿日期:1997-05-26 修回日期:1998-04-07 出版日期:1998-12-20 发布日期:1998-12-20
  • 作者简介:刘玉平,男,1963年生,工程师,博士。主要从事荒漠化防治和环境信息技术研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家攀登计划课题"干旱、半干旱土地荒漠化发展的评价、监测和预报"项目资助

THE EVALUATING INDICATOR SYSTEM OF GRASS LAND DESERTIFICATION IN MU US SANDY LAND

LIU Yu ping1,2, CI Long jun2   

  1. 1. The Information Center of State Environment Protecting Bureau, Beijing 100029;
    2. The Sand Control Office of State Forestry Bureau, Beijing 100714
  • Received:1997-05-26 Revised:1998-04-07 Online:1998-12-20 Published:1998-12-20

摘要: 毛乌素沙地草场荒漠化的主要原因是开垦、过度放牧、樵柴和挖药材等,沙地草场荒漠化过程分为4个阶段,即轻度退化、中度退化、严重退化和极严重退化。应用植物被分类、排序和梯度分析等技术研究了沙地草场荒漠化过程。轻度退化阶段以臭柏、麻黄等中旱生灌木为主;中度退化以油蒿、柠条等为主;严重退化以籽蒿、羊柴等为主;极严重退化以沙米、牛心朴子等为主。随着退化的发展,地表覆沙厚度逐渐增大,土壤中各种营养成分大幅度下降,土壤机械组成粗化,由沙壤土向沙土发展,沿退化梯度群落种多样性呈现单峰曲线变化。在此基础上提出沙地草场在群落水平上的荒漠化评价指标体系。

关键词: 指标体系, 草场荒漠化, 评价, 毛乌素沙地

Abstract: The area of global desertified grass land occupies 93.6% of global desertified land's area. The proportion of desertified grass land in China to it's all grass land is 566%. Grass land is one of the main types in Mu Us Sandy Land, and it has also degraded in different degrees because of irrational economic activities. For evaluating the grass land desertification processes in Mu Us Sandy Land, 9 investigating sites were studied based on the interpretation of TM in 1994 and airphotos in different time, and considering the main desertification types and regional differentiation. On each site, 1-9 sample belts were choiced according to land types, landform characters, plant types and the degradation features. The sample belts are more than 500 m long and were arranged along degrading gradient direction. There is a small quadrate (1 m×1 m) for every 5 m on each sample belt, and 3-10 random typical quadrates (5 m×5 m for shrub community and 1 m×1 m for herb community) near sample belts. The measured subjects include vegetation coverage and the ratios, plant composition and height, as well as shrub density etc.. Moreover, typical soil sections under different vegetation types were unburied to investigate soil texture, structure, gardening degree, color, humidity and root system etc.. DCA sorting and TWINSPAN classification prove that grass land degraded in the direction from the fixed and the semifixed to the semishifing and the shifting; the stage of grass land degraded mildly is predominated by Sabina vulgaris Ant., moderately degraded stage by Artemisia ordosica Krasch, Caragana korshinskii Kom., severely degraded stage by Artemisia sphaoerocephala Krasch, Hedysarum laeve (Maxim.) B. Fedtsch and very severely degraded stage by Agriophyllum squarrosm (L.) Moq., Cynanchum komarovii Al. Iljin. Correlation analysis indicates that the degradation gradient of plant community is closely related to surface crust thickness, soil organic matter and soil texture. Biodiversity analysis proves that community biodiversity changes with one peak curve in the processes of grass land's degradation. Based on the analysis above, the indicator system of evaluating sandy grass land's degradation on community level are obtained:mildly degraded grass lands have the characteristics of surface crust thickness1 cm, soil organic matter1%, fine sand loam soil, S. vulgaris Ant. community type; moderately degraded grass lands have the characteristics of surface crust thickness between 0.5%-1%, sandy loam soil, A. ordosica community type; severely degraded grass lands have the characteristics of surface crust thickness0.5 cm,soil organic matter between 0.2%-0.5%, sandy soil, H.laeve community type; very severely degraded grass lands have the characteristics of no surface crust, soil organic matter 0.2%, sandy soil, A. squarrosm community type.

Key words: Indicator system, Grass land desertification, Evaluation, Mu Us Sandy Land

中图分类号: