Comparison of the Sand-blocking Effects of HDPE Windbreaks

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00120

JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 925-931.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2015.00120

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of the Sand-blocking Effects of HDPE Windbreaks

Ma Xuexi^1,2, Li Shengyu¹, He Zhihui¹, Wang Haifeng¹, Feng Xiao^1,2, Wu Xincheng³

1. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Institute of Highway Science and Technology, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumqi 830002, China

Received:2015-01-22 Revised:2015-04-28 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, four types of sand-resistance nets with a height of 120cm were designed according to structure of the windbreaks characterized by an uniform porosity (a), 60cm-wide nets with a upper sparse and lower dense porosity (b), 10/20cm-wide nets with a interactive porosity (c), and 40cm-wide nets (d). The above mentioned nets was placed over some inter-dune corridor of central Taklimakan Desert. The results showed that: (1) These erosion and accumulation shapes of the deposited sand section presented in unimodal form, but their width and height were various; moreover, the height of all the three types of sand-blocking net with the non-uniform porosity was bigger than that of the sand-blocking net with the uniform porosity, and the order was c> b> d> a. (2) The mass of deposited sand was c> a> b> d, and mainly focused on the leeward. However, b and c is more than that of a and d for the mass of deposited sand on the windward side. (3) The deposited sand mass of different types of windbreaks and their spatial distribution discrepancy closely related with the structures of the sand blocking net and special wind field.

Key words: morphological feature of sand deposition, deposited sand mass, high vertical sand barrier, sand blocking effects

CLC Number:

P931.3

Ma Xuexi, Li Shengyu, He Zhihui, Wang Haifeng, Feng Xiao, Wu Xincheng. Comparison of the Sand-blocking Effects of HDPE Windbreaks[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(4): 925-931.

References

[1] 马瑞,刘虎俊,马彦军,等.沙源供给条件对机械沙障固沙作用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):104-108.
[2] 张克存,屈建军,姚正毅,等.青藏铁路格拉段风沙危害及其防治[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(1):74-80.
[3] 屈建军,凌裕泉,俎瑞平,等.半隐蔽格状沙障的综合防护效益观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):329-335.
[4] 孙涛,刘虎俊,朱国庆,等.3种机械沙障防风固沙功能的时效性[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):12-16,22.
[5] 张克存,屈建军,俎瑞平,等.不同结构的尼龙网和塑料网防沙效应研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):483-487.
[6] 蒙仲举,任晓萌,高永.低立式纤维沙袋沙障防风固沙效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(2):294-296,301.
[7] Qu J J,Han Q J,Dong G R,et al.A study of the characteristics of aeolian sand activity and the effects of a comprehensive protective system in a coastal dune area in southern China[J].Engineering,2013,77:28-39.
[8] 马学喜,李生宇,王海峰,等.流动沙漠地形起伏区尼龙网方格沙障破损程度的空间分异[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(2):81-88.
[9] 袁立敏,高永,黄海广,等.生物模块沙障对流动沙丘土壤微生物分布的影响[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(1):189-194.
[10] 屈建军,井哲帆,张克存,等.HDPE蜂巢式固沙障研制与防沙效应实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2008,28(4):599-604.
[11] 何志辉,李生宇,王海峰,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠4种结构尼龙阻沙网的防风阻沙效益对比[J].干旱区研究,2014,31(2):369-374.
[12] 屈建军,喻文波,秦晓波.HDPE功能性固沙障防风效应试验[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(5):1185-1193.
[13] 康向光,李生宇,马学喜,等.两条尼龙阻沙网不同组合间距的积沙量对比分析[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(2):347-354.
[14] 姚正毅,陈广庭,韩致文,机械防沙体系防沙功能的衰退过程[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(2):226-231.
[15] 王训明,陈广庭,韩致文,等.塔里木沙漠公路沿线机械防沙体系效益分析[J].中国沙漠,1999,19(2):120-127.
[16] 凌裕泉,金炯,邹本功,等.栅栏在防止前沿积沙中的作用:以沙坡头地区为例[J].中国沙漠,1984,3(4):16-25.
[17] 张克存,俎瑞平,方海燕.不同孔隙度尼龙网对风沙流减弱作用的风洞模拟[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):4-11.
[18] Cornelis W M,Gabriels D.Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2005(612):315-332.
[19] 罗万银,董治宝,钱广强.栅栏最佳疏透度的空气动力学评价[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(4):583-588.
[20] Yeh C P,Tsai C H,Yang R J.An investigation into the sheltering performance of porous windbreaks under various wind directions[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2010,98(10/11):520-532.
[21] Rosenberg N J.Microclimate:The Biological Environment[M].New York,USA:Wiley,1974.
[22] Huang L M,Chan H,Lee J T.A numerical study on flow around nonuniform porous fences[J].Journal of Applied Mathematics,2012,100:1-12.
[23] Hagen L J.Windbreak design for optimum wind erosion control[C]//Proceedings of the Symposium:Shelterbelts on the Great Plains.Denver,USA,1976:20-22.

Comparison of the Sand-blocking Effects of HDPE Windbreaks

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Kaijia Pan, Zhengcai Zhang, Aimin Lang. The characteristics of inner boundary layer airflow over reversing dunes and its effect on dune morphological evolution [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 1-8.
[2]	Ying Yang, Lü Ping, Fang Ma, Zhun Liang, Mingjing Xu. Characteristics of wind regime in the southwest edge of the Ulan Buh Desert and their influence on the formation of dome dune [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 19-26.
[3]	Sarina, Zhibao Dong, Weige Nan. The Aesthetic Value of Mega-dune Lines in the Badain Jaran Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 221-230.
[4]	Chunming Zhu, Zhibao Dong, Zhengyao Liu, Nan Xiao, Junhuai Yang, Miaoyan Feng. Grain size and micro-morphology characteristics of the surface ediments of dendritic sand dunes in the Gurbantunggut Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 9-18.
[5]	Xiangjie Li, Zhiwen Li, Jiangzhen Zhan, Li Sun, Lan Du, Chu Hou. Grain size characteristics and influencing factors of sediments in the Houtian sandy land of Nanchang， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(2): 92-99.
[6]	Mingzhu Zhao, Ruiping Zu, Junzhan Wang, Lihai Tan. Grain size characteristics of sediment along the Hami-Lop Nor Railway [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 19-27.
[7]	Min Tian, Guangqiang Qian, Zhuanling Yang, Wanyin Luo, Junfeng Lu. Characteristics of wind regime and its influences on the development of aeolian landforms in the Haertenghe Reach, northeastern Qaidam Basin, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(1): 1-9.
[8]	Yabin Chang, Rui Zhu, Shengchun Xiao, Yapei Li. Sandy land change from 1980 to 2015 in Alxa League， China and its driving factors [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(6): 82-90.
[9]	Yang Bai, Jiasheng Chen, Yan Cheng, Tian Zhang. Distribution of Holocene aeolian coastal sand deposits of Guangdong Province， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(6): 71-81.
[10]	Yuejun Si, Baosheng Li, Zhiwen Li, Fengnian Wang, Dongfeng Niu, Shuhuan Du. A comparative analysis of grain size characteristics of modern aeolian sand and beach sand from the coast of Beibu Gulf in China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(6): 43-52.
[11]	Zhun Liang, Lü Ping, Zhengyao Liu, Nan Xiao, Wei Liang, Mingjing Xu, Miaoyan Feng. The relationship between wind regime and yardang morphology in the Duck Lake Area of Qaidam Basin， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 42-48.
[12]	Guangyin Hu, Zhibao Dong, Zhengcai Zhang, Ming Zhou, Lunyu Shang. The regime of sand driving wind and sand drift potential in Zoige Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 20-24.
[13]	Qianqian Liu, Xiaoping Yang. Spatial variations of grain size parameters of dune sands in the Mu Us Sandy Land and Hobq Sand Sea， northern China and its potential causes [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 158-168.
[14]	Xixi Ma, Jianhua Xiao, Zhengyi Yao. A comparative study on the three calculation methods of grain-size parameters for aeolian sediments [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 95-102.
[15]	Keqi Wang, Hui Zhao, Yongwei Sheng, Shengan Zhang, Xingfan Wang, Hongyu Yang, Qian Chao. Distribution and morphological parameters of dunes in the Badain Jaran Desert based on DEM [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(4): 81-94.