Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00088

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 78-87.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2021.00088

Previous Articles Next Articles

Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin

Jie Yang^a(), Baopeng Xie^b(), Degang Zhang^a

^a.College of Pratacultural Science /, Gansu Agricultural University，Lanzhou 730070，China
^b.College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University，Lanzhou 730070，China

Received:2021-06-09 Revised:2021-07-19 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-17
Contact: Baopeng Xie

Abstract

Abstract:

It is of great significance to explore the trade-off and synergy of ecological services in river basins and their scale effects for rational formulation of eco-environmental policies and effective allocation of environmental resources. Taking the Yellow River Basin as the research object， six periods of data in 1990， 1995， 2000， 2005， 2010 and 2018 were used to evaluate five ecological service： water yield， carbon stock， soil conservation， habitat quality and net primary productivity （NPP）. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the trade-off relationship between the five ecological services in the whole basin and the secondary regions. The results show that there is a trade-off relationship between water yield， carbon stock and habitat quality at the whole basin scale， and there is a synergistic relationship among other services. The relationships between water yield and carbon stock， water yield and habitat quality， carbon storage and soil conservation， carbon stock and habitat quality， carbon stock and NPP， soil conservation and habitat quality are consistent with those of the whole Yellow River Basin. However， the relationships between water yield and soil conservation， water yield and NPP， soil conservation and NPP， and habitat quality and NPP are different among watersheds. From the histogram of correlation coefficient， it can be seen that the ecological service as a whole show obvious watershed differences and show the regional laws of upper， middle and lower reaches. Multi-scale evaluation of the trade-off and synergy between ecological services can provide reliable reference for formulating win-win policies for the development and ecological protection of the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: ecological service, trade-off and synergy, spatial heterogeneity, Yellow River Basin

CLC Number:

X171

Jie Yang, Baopeng Xie, Degang Zhang. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 78-87.

Figures/Tables 5

References 26

1	曹祺文，卫晓梅，吴健生.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展［J］.生态学杂志，2016，35（11）：3102-3111.
2	Rodríguez J P，Beard T D，Bennett E M，et al.Trade-offs across space，time，and ecosystem services［J］.Ecology and Society，2006，T11：709-723.
3	Li B Y，Wang W.Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China［J］.Ecological Indicators，2018，84：837-846.
4	Boithias L，Acuña V，Vergoñós L，et al.Assessment of the water supply：demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives［J］.Science of The Total Environent，2014，470/471：567-577.
5	幸赞品，颜长珍，冯坤，等.1975—2015年甘肃省白龙江流域自然保护区生态系统服务价值及其时空差异［J］.中国沙漠，2019，39（3）：172-182.
6	Serna-Chavez H M，Schulp C J E，van Bodegom P M，et al.A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services［J］.Ecological Indicators，2014，39：24-33.
7	Mitchell M G E，Bennett E M，Gonzalez A，et al.Strong and nonlinear effects of fragmentation on ecosystem service provision at multiple scales［J］.Environmental Research Letters，2015，10（9）：094014.
8	Li J，Zhou Z X.Natural and human impacts on ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China［J］.Environmental Science and Pollution Research，2016，23：6803-6815.
9	Turner K G，Odgaard M V，Bocher P K，et al.Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark：trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning，2014，125：89-104.
10	Haase D，Schwarz N，Strohbach M，et al.Synergies，trade-offs，and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions：an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region，Germany［J］.Ecology and Society，2012，17：22.
11	Nelson E，Mendoza G，Regetz J，et al.Modeling multiple ecosystem services，biodiversity conservation，commodity production，and tradeoffs at landscape scales［J］.Frontiers in Ecology and The Environment，2019，7：4-11.
12	Johnson G W，Bagstad K J，Snapp R R.，et al.Service path attribution networks （SPANs）［J］.International Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Information Systems，2014，3：54-71.
13	Hou Y，Lü Y H，Chen W P，et al.Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions：a case study on the central Loess Plateau of China［J］.Landscape Ecology，2017，32：1201-1217.
14	Han Z，Song W，Deng X Z，et al.Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem service within the Three-Rivers Headwater Region，China［J］.Water，2017，9（8）：588.
15	Felipe-lucia M R，Comín F A，Bennett E M.Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem［J］.Ecology and Society，2014，19：360-375.
16	余玉洋，李晶，周自翔，等.基于多尺度秦巴山区生态系统服务权衡协同关系的表达［J］.生态学报，2020，40（16）：5465-5477.
17	Potter C S，Randerson J T，Field C B，et al.Tessestrial ecosystem production：a process model based on global satellite and surface data［J］.Global Biogeochemical Cycles，1993，7（4）：811-841.
18	Sharp R，Tallis H，Ricketts T，et al.InVEST 3.6.0 User’s Guide［Z］.The Natural Capital Projet，Stanford university，University of Minnesota，The Nature Conservacy，and World Wildlife Fund，2018.
19	Zhang L，Dawes W R，Walker G R.Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catch-ment scale［J］.Water Resources Research，2001，37（3）：701-708.
20	Wischmeier W H，Smith D D.Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses：A guide to Conservation Planning［M］.Washington，USA：USDA，1978.
21	刘洋，张军，周冬梅，等.基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域碳储量时空变化研究［J］.生态学报，2021，32（10）：1-14.
22	包玉斌，刘康，李婷，等.基于 InVEST 模型的土地利用变化对生境的影响：以陕西省黄河湿地自然保护区为例［J］.干旱区研究，2015，32（3）：622-629.
23	Hu X，Hong W，Qiu R，et al.Geographic variations of ecosystem service intensity in Fuzhou City，China［J］.Science of The Total Environent，2015，512/513：215-226.
24	Reddy C S，Manaswini G，Satish K V，et al.Conservation priorities of forest ecosystems：evaluation of deforestation and degradation hotspots using geospatial techniques［J］.Ecological Engineering，2016，91：333-342.
25	巩杰，柳冬青，高秉丽，等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系：以甘肃白龙江流域为例［J］.应用生态学报，2020，31（4）：1278-1288.
26	彭萱亦，吴金卓，栾兆平，等.中国典型森林生态系统生物多样性评价综述［J］.森林工程，2013，29（6）：4-10.

年份	产水量/亿m³	土壤保持量/亿t	碳储量/亿t	生境质量指数	NPP（以C计量）/（g·m^-2）
1990	391.267	78.246	19.320	0.682	253.04
1995	284.483	76.169	18.431	0.682	223.82
2000	195.724	73.836	18.276	0.682	271.85
2005	456.244	76.348	17.902	0.684	284.37
2010	346.998	75.195	17.221	0.683	255.91
2018	451.695	78.426	15.465	0.684	296.10

年份	产水量/亿m³	土壤保持量/亿t	碳储量/亿t	生境质量指数	NPP（以C计量）/（g·m^-2）
1990	391.267	78.246	19.320	0.682	253.04
1995	284.483	76.169	18.431	0.682	223.82
2000	195.724	73.836	18.276	0.682	271.85
2005	456.244	76.348	17.902	0.684	284.37
2010	346.998	75.195	17.221	0.683	255.91
2018	451.695	78.426	15.465	0.684	296.10

生态系统服务类型	全流域	二级流域
产水量与碳储量	权衡关系	8个二级流域全为权衡关系
产水量与土壤保持量	协同关系	权衡关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、龙羊峡以上、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）协同关系（花园口以下、兰州至河口镇、龙门至三门峡、）
产水量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、花园口以下、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）协同关系（兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上）
产水量与生境质量	权衡关系	8个二级流域全为权衡关系
碳储量与土壤保持量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
碳储量与生境质量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
碳储量与NPP	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
土壤保持量与生境质量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
土壤保持量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（花园口以下）协同关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）
生境质量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（花园口以下）协同关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）

生态系统服务类型	全流域	二级流域
产水量与碳储量	权衡关系	8个二级流域全为权衡关系
产水量与土壤保持量	协同关系	权衡关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、龙羊峡以上、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）协同关系（花园口以下、兰州至河口镇、龙门至三门峡、）
产水量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、花园口以下、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）协同关系（兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上）
产水量与生境质量	权衡关系	8个二级流域全为权衡关系
碳储量与土壤保持量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
碳储量与生境质量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
碳储量与NPP	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
土壤保持量与生境质量	协同关系	8个二级流域全为协同关系
土壤保持量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（花园口以下）协同关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）
生境质量与NPP	协同关系	权衡关系（花园口以下）协同关系（三门峡至花园口、河口镇至龙门、兰州至河口镇、龙羊峡以上、龙门至三门峡、龙羊峡至兰州、内流区）

[1]	Cheng Zhou, Binghua Liu, Xuhong Zhang, Juan Tian, Lin Zhou. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of heritage conservation units in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 10-20.
[2]	Zhiwei Ding, Rui Zhao, Zihan Jian, Yiwei Meng, Gaisu Zhang. Economics spatial pattern and its influencing factors of Yellow River Basin at town scale from the perspective of urban-rural integration [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 195-204.
[3]	Juan Wang, Huijuan He, Jinfang Dong, Bin Guo. Spatio-temporal distribution of vegetation net primary productivity in the Yellow River Basin in 2000-2019 and its natural driving factors [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 213-222.
[4]	Pan Yang, Wei Liang, Jianwu Yan, Siya Li, Zhiyang Lan. Multi-scale analysis of water system structure changes in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 223-234.
[5]	Haijin Shi, Wenheng Wu, Yan Li, Jinfeng Liu, Yun Wan. Study on spatial expansion and dynamic factors of built-up area of central cities in the Yellow River Basin based on night-time light data [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 235-248.
[6]	Cheng Zhou, Xuhong Zhang, Qian Zhang, Binghua Liu. The construction of "Five in One" comprehensive evaluation system and spatial difference in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 1-11.
[7]	Jie Yang, Baopeng Xie, Degang Zhang. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin based on InVEST model and GeoDetector [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 12-22.
[8]	Man Sun, Tao Song. Spatio-temporal patterns and coordinated development of technological innovation and industrial development in the Yellow River Basin of Gansu Province， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 140-151.
[9]	Mengtao Han, Jianjun Tu, Guiping Xu, Li Jiang. Spatio-temporal coordination between aquatic ecosystem services and economic development in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 167-176.
[10]	Guangqin Li, Xubing Fang. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of green development level in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 129-139.
[11]	Gaopeng Sun, Xianfeng Liu, Xiaohong Wang, Shuangshuang Li. Changes in vegetation coverage and its influencing factors across the Yellow River Basin during 2001-2020 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 205-212.
[12]	Youheng Wang, Dan Tan, Lanying Han, Danhua Li, xin Wang, Guoyang Lu, Jingjing Lin. Review of climate change in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 235-246.
[13]	Li Jun, Wang Xinjun, Jia Hongtao, Zhao Chengyi. Multi-scale Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture in the South Gurbantunggut Desert during Dry Period [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(6): 1628-1636.
[14]	Liu Jinhui, Wang Xueqin, Ma Yang, Tan Fengzhu. Spatial Variation of Soil Salinity on Tamarix ramosissima Nebkhas and Interdune in Oasis-desert Ecotone [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2016, 36(1): 181-189.
[15]	Wei HuiLan, Guo Da. Dynamic Change and Its Driving Forces of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem in Maqu, Gansu, China [J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2015, 35(5): 1413-1420.

Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments