两种柔性植株地表风速廓线特征比较的风洞模拟

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00096

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植株减小风速从而抑制风蚀,风速廓线可以反映植株对风速的影响。在风洞中测量了细长状植株和上大下小形状植株在不同覆盖密度、不同来流风速下的风速廓线,并对这两种植株地表上空气动力学粗糙度、零平面位移高度进行了比较。结果表明:两种植株地表的空气动力学粗糙度均随植株密度按幂函数规律增加,其与植株高度之比也随侧影盖度按幂函数规律增加。在相同覆盖密度或侧影盖度条件下,上大下小形状植株地表的空气动力学粗糙度大于细长状植株。细长状植株地表的零平面位移高度随植株密度的增加先增加而后减小,而上大下小形状植株地表的零平面位移高度则基本不受植株密度的影响。

关键词: 植株形态, 风速廓线, 空气动力学粗糙度, 零平面位移高度, 风洞实验

Abstract: Plants reduce wind speed resulting in the lower soil wind erosion. The characteristics of wind velocity profile are a reflection of wind speed variation at the surface of different plants. In this paper, the wind velocity profiles above two plant surfaces (the first is the slender plants and the second is the plants with large upper part and small lower part) are measured at different plant density and free-stream wind speed in a wind tunnel, then the aerodynamic roughness length and zero-plane displacement are analyzed. The results show that the aerodynamic roughness length of the two plant surfaces increases with plant density according to the power function, and its ratio to plant height also increases with lateral cover by the power law. At the same plant density or lateral cover, the aerodynamic roughness length of the second plant surface is larger than that of the first one. The zero-plane displacement of the first plant surface increases first and then decreases with the increase of plant density, while the zero-plane displacement of the second plant surface is generally unaffected by plant density.

Key words: plant morphology, wind velocity profile, aerodynamic roughness length, zero-plane displacement, wind tunnel experiment

中图分类号:

X169

亢力强, 杨智成, 张军杰, 邹学勇, 张文. 两种柔性植株地表风速廓线特征比较的风洞模拟[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(2): 43-49.

Kang Liqiang, Yang Zhicheng, Zhang Junjie, Zou Xueyong, Zhang Wen. Wind tunnel simulation for comparison of wind velocity profile characteristics at two flexible plant surfaces[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 43-49.

参考文献

[1] Leenders J K,Boxel J H V,Sterk G.The effect of single vegetation elements on wind speed and sediment transport in the Sahelian zone of Burkina Faso[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2010,32:1454-1474.
[2] Alfaro S C,Rajot J L,Nickling W.Estimation of PM₂₀ emissions by wind erosion:main sources of uncertainties[J].Geomorphology,2004,59:63-74.
[3] Wolfe S A,Nickling W G.The protective role of sparse vegetation in wind erosion[J].Progress in Physical Geography,1993,17:50-68.
[4] Raupach M R,Thom A S,Edwards I.A wind-tunnel study of turbulent flow close to regularly arrayed rough surfaces[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1980,18:373-397.
[5] 刘小平,董治宝.直立植被粗糙度和阻力分解的风洞实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22:82-87.
[6] Dong Z,Gao S,Fryrear D W.Drag coefficients,roughness length and zero-plane displacement height as disturbed by artificial standing vegetation[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2001,49(3):485-505.
[7] 董治宝,陈渭南,李振山,等.植被对土壤风蚀影响作用的实验研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2:1-8.
[8] Minvielle F,Marticorena B,Gillette D A,et al.Relationship between the aerodynamic roughness length and the roughness density in cases of low roughness density[J].Environmental Fluid Mechanics,2003,3:249-267.
[9] Raupach M R,Hughes D E,Cleugh H A.Momentum absorption in rough-wall boundary layers with sparse roughness elements in random and clustered distributions[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2006,120:201-218.
[10] Hagishima A,Tanimoto J,Nagayama K,et al.Aerodynamic parameters of regular arrays of rectangular blocks with various geometries[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2009,132:315-337.
[11] Counihan J.Wind tunnel determination of the roughness length as a function of the fetch and the roughness density of three-dimensional roughness elements[J].Atmospheric Environment,1971,5:637-642.
[12] Macdonald R W,Griffiths R F,Hall D J.An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays[J].Atmospheric Environment,1998,32:1857-1864.
[13] 覃文汉.应用压力中心法确定农田空气动力参数[J].气象学报,1994,52(1):99-106.
[14] 张春来,邹学勇,董光荣,等.植被对土壤风蚀影响的风洞实验研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):31-33.
[15] 刘艳萍,刘铁军,蒙仲举.草原区植被对土壤风蚀影响的风洞模拟实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33:668-672.
[16] Lettau H.Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description[J].Journal of Applied Meteorology,1969,8:828-832.
[17] Molion L C B,Moore C J.Estimating the zero-plane displacement for tall vegetation using a mass conservation method[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1983,26:115-125.
[18] 赵晓松,关德新,吴家兵,等.长白山阔叶红松林的零平面位移和粗糙度[J].生态学杂志,2004,23:84-88.
[19] Kang L Q,Zhang J J,Zou X Y,et al.Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic roughness length for flexible plants[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2019,172:397-416.
[20] Kim D S,Cho G H,White B R.A wind-tunnel study of atmospheric boundary-layer flow over vegetated surfaces to suppress PM₁₀ emission on Owens (dry) Lake[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2000,97:309-329.