img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 9-15.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2018.00088

• • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦玉米田耕作模式的防风蚀效果

杨彩红1, 冯福学2, 柴强3,4, 耿艳香1, 伏星舟1   

  1. 1. 甘肃农业大学 林学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    2. 甘肃农业大学 水利水电工程学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    3. 甘肃农业大学 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730070;
    4. 甘肃农业大学 农学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-15 修回日期:2018-06-25 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 柴强(E-mail:chaiq@gsau.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:杨彩红(1981-),女,甘肃白银人,博士,副教授,主要从事节水农业、水土保持和荒漠化防治教学与科研工作。E-mail:yangch@gsau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41561062,31301283,31771738);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(18JR3RA176);甘肃省高等学校基本科研项目(2017A-030);甘肃农业大学学科建设开放基金项目(GSAU-XKJS-2018-106);现代农业绿肥产业体系项目(CARS-22-G-12)

Soil Wind Erosion in Wheat/Maize Intercropping with Zero Tillage and Straw Retention

Yang Caihong1, Feng Fuxue2, Chai Qiang3,4, Geng Yanxiang1, Fu Xingzhou1   

  1. 1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    3. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    4. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2018-05-15 Revised:2018-06-25 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-12

摘要: 通过风洞实验,在5个风速下对6种耕作方式下农田土壤风蚀速率、0~20 cm风沙流结构进行了模拟研究。结果表明:保护性耕作土壤风蚀速率较传统耕作平均降低20%~40%;保护性耕作和传统耕作条件下土壤风蚀速率均随风速的增大呈幂函数递增,但在传统耕作条件下递增较快;风速14 m·s-1是荒漠绿洲农田土壤风蚀加剧转折点,当风速>14 m·s-1时保护性耕作下风蚀速率较传统耕作明显降低;0~20 cm内,传统耕作和保护性耕作下输沙率与高度分别呈线性和指数关系,保护性耕作下0~4 cm输沙量和输沙量百分比(Q0~4/Q0~20)均低于传统耕作。

关键词: 免耕轮作, 间作, 土壤风蚀, 风洞实验, 风沙流结构

Abstract: Through wind tunnel experiment, the rate of soil wind erosion and blown sand structure under condition of conservational tillage and conventional tillage were studied. The results indicated that:The mean rates of soil wind erosion under conservational tillage were 20 to 40 percent less than that under conventional tillage. A power functions was found between the rate of wind erosion and wind velocity in the eight simulated tillage conditions, and the rate of wind erosion increased faster with the increasing wind velocity under conventional tillage. Wind velocity of 14 m·s-1 was the significant point to aggravate soil wind erosion, while conservational tillage greatly decreased the rate of soil wind erosion when the wind velocity beyond 14 m·s-1. In the height of 0-20 cm, the sand transport rate under conventional tillage decreased within increasing height by a negative line function, while negative exponential functions were founded under conservational tillage. Under conservational tillage, the total volume of sand transport in 0-4 cm and sand transport percent between 0-4 cm and 0-20 cm were less than that under conventional tillage.

Key words: no tillage with crop rotation, intercropping, soil wind erosion, wind tunnel test, structure of wind-sand flow

中图分类号: