img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 142-150.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00086

• • 上一篇    

黄河流域旅游业高质量发展系统性评价

周霖1(), 张旭红2, 周成3,4(), 靳轶婷3, 吕丝丝3, 秦秋月3   

  1. 1.西北师范大学 旅游学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.西安理工大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710054
    3.山西财经大学,文化旅游与新闻艺术学院,山西 太原 030006
    4.山西财经大学,数字文旅产业学院,山西 太原 030006
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-08 修回日期:2023-10-09 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 周成
  • 作者简介:周成(E-mail: zhoutravel@163.com
    周霖(1994—),男,山西忻州人,硕士研究生,主要从事经济地理、旅游地理等方面研究。E-mail: zhoulin05@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(23BGL166)

A systematic evaluation of high-quality tourism development in provinces along the Yellow River

Lin Zhou1(), Xuhong Zhang2, Cheng Zhou3,4(), Yiting Jing3, Sisi Lv3, Qiuyue Qin3   

  1. 1.Tourism College,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China
    2.School of Economic and Management,Xi'an University of Technology,Xi'an 710054,China
    3.Faculty of Culture,Tourism,Journalism and Art /, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China
    4.School of Digital Culture and Tourism, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China
  • Received:2023-05-08 Revised:2023-10-09 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-30
  • Contact: Cheng Zhou

摘要:

以黄河流域为研究靶区,构建了基于旅游经济发展、技术创新、产品供给、公共服务、产业人才和生态环境等6大维度、48个具体指标构成的旅游业高质量发展评价体系,运用熵值权重、加权TOPSIS和耦合协调模型对其子系统权重、综合性发展以及耦合协调给予研究。结果显示:子系统权重旅游技术创新>旅游经济发展>旅游产业人才>旅游生态环境>旅游公共服务>旅游产品供给;旅游创新产出、旅游经济规模、旅游人才规模、生态环境治理、公共信息服务、旅游资源丰富度分别在上述子系统中所占权重也较大。旅游经济发展与产品供给在黄河流域空间格局相似,旅游科技创新与产业人才的空间格局相似。旅游生态环境则与其他子系统差异较大,在黄河流域呈西高东低、北高南低分布格局。除四川省外,旅游业高质量发展综合水平在黄河流域总体呈河段差异性特征,下游省区发展等级较高,中下游省区次之,上游省区多为低等级类型。此外,沿线省区旅游业高质量发展制约因素主要有生态环境、科技创新与经济发展3种类型。

关键词: 高质量发展, 旅游业, 系统性评价, TOPSIS, 黄河流域

Abstract:

This paper focuses on the nine provinces along the Yellow River Basin as the research area to construct a six-dimensional evaluation system for the high-quality development of the tourism industry. The dimensions include tourism economy, technological innovation, product supply, public services, industry talents, and ecological environment. The research employs entropy weight, weighted TOPSIS, and coupling coordination models to evaluate the subsystem weights, comprehensive development, and coupling coordination. The results indicate that the subsystem weights are ranked as follows: technological innovation > tourism economy > industry talents > ecological environment > public services > product supply. In addition, the tourism innovation output, tourism economy scale, tourism talent scale, ecological environment governance, public information services, and tourism resource abundance have relatively high weights in the six subsystems. The spatial pattern of tourism economic development and product supply in the Yellow River Basin is similar, as is the spatial pattern of tourism technological innovation and industry talents. However, there are significant differences in the tourism ecological environment compared to other subsystems. The spatial distribution of tourism ecological environment in the Yellow River Basin is high in the west and low in the east, and high in the north and low in the south. Except for Sichuan Province, the overall level of high-quality development of the tourism industry in the Yellow River Basin shows differences in the river section. The downstream provinces are of a higher level, followed by the middle and lower reaches, while the upstream provinces are mostly low-level types. Furthermore, the main factors that constrain the high-quality development of the tourism industry in the provinces along the Yellow River Basin are ecological environment, technological innovation, and tourism economy.

Key words: high-quality development, tourism industry, systematic evaluation, TOPSIS, Yellow River Basin

中图分类号: