沙埋对小麦（Triticum aestivum）生长的影响及其生理响应

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00371

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解沙埋对小麦（Triticum aestivum ）生长的影响及其生理响应，2010年在科尔沁沙地研究了不同沙埋深度下小麦的存活率、株高、地上地下生物量、籽实产量、丙二醛（MDA）含量、膜透性、保护酶（超氧化物歧化酶，SOD；过氧化物酶，POD；过氧化氢酶，CAT）活性和渗透调节物质含量变化。结果表明：随着沙埋深度的增加，小麦存活率、株高、地上地下生物量和籽实产量均显著下降，完全沙埋下第6天以后植株全部死亡。沙埋第6天，随着沙埋深度的增加，MDA含量、CAT活性、可溶性糖含量下降，POD活性变化不明显，但膜透性、SOD活性和脯氨酸含量显著增加。沙埋第12天，随着沙埋厚度增加，MDA含量和膜透性，SOD、POD和CAT活性，脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量均显著增加。沙埋导致小麦死亡率增加、株高及生物产量下降的主要原因不是水分胁迫，沙埋导致的光合面积降低，黑暗和无氧呼吸可能是其死亡和生长受到抑制的主要外部因素，而膜脂过氧化导致的膜透性增加可能是其死亡或生长受到抑制的主要生理机制。保护酶活性增强和渗透调节物质含量增加，对于减轻其细胞膜受损和防止细胞质渗漏起到了重要作用。

关键词: 小麦(Triticum aestivum), 沙埋, 生长特性, 生理响应

Abstract: Changes on survival rate, plant height, above and below ground biomass, seed yield, malondialdehyde, membrane permeability, protect enzyme activity and osmotic regulation substances of wheat in different sand burial depths was studies during 2010-2011 in the Horqin Sand Land of Inner Mongolia to understand effects of sand burial on wheat growth and its physiological response. The results showed that the survival rate, plant height, above and below ground biomass, seed yield decreased significantly with creasing sand burial, all seedlings died at sixth day in the complete sand burial. At the sixth day of sand burial, malondialdehyde content, catalase activity and soluble sugar content decreased significantly with increase of sand burial depth, while membrane permeability, superoxide dismutase activity and proline content increased significantly and change of peroxidase activity was not significant. At the s twelfth day of sand burial, malondialdehyde and membrane permeability, activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase, as well as proline and soluble sugar contents increased significantly with increase of sand burial depth. Main causes on increased mortality, growth inhibition and decreased biomass is not water stress in sand burial stress, which should be attribution to a decrease of photosynthetic area, dark and anaerobic respiration, as well as lipid peroxidation and cell membrane damage. But increase of protective enzyme activities and osmotic regulation substances played an important role to reduce cell membrane damage and prevent the leakage of cytoplasm.

Key words: wheat, sand burial, growth properties, physiological response

中图分类号:

Q948.3

赵哈林, 曲浩, 周瑞莲, 云建英, 李瑾, 王进. 沙埋对小麦（Triticum aestivum）生长的影响及其生理响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3): 689-695.

Zhao Halin, Qu Hao, Zhou Ruilian, Yun Jianying, Li Jin, Wang Jin. Effects of Sand Burial on Growth of Wheat and Its Physiological Responses[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2014, 34(3): 689-695.

参考文献

[1] 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程及其恢复机理[M].北京:海洋出版社,2003.
[2] Zhao H L,Zhou R L,Zhang T H,Zhao X Y.Effects of desertification on soil and crop growth properties in Horqin sandy farmland of Inner Mongolia[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2006,87:175-185.
[3] 李荣平,蒋德明,刘志民,等.沙埋对六种沙生植物种子萌发和幼苗出土的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1865-1868
[4] 何玉惠,赵哈林,赵学勇,等.沙埋对小叶锦鸡儿幼苗生长和生物量分配的影响[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(5):701-706.
[5] 赵文智,刘志民.西藏特有灌木砂生槐繁殖生长对海拔和沙埋的响应[J].生态学报,2002,22(1):134-139.
[6] Shi L,Zhang Z J,Zhang C Y.Effects of sand burial on survival,growth,gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumilaseedlings in the Hunshandak Sand Land,China[J].Annals of Botany,2004,94:553-560
[7] 徐斌,刘杏娥,孙主义,等.长江滩地沙埋杨树木材解剖性质及其变异的研究[J].林业科学研究,2005,18(6):738-742.
[8] 王进,周瑞莲,赵哈林,等.海滨沙地砂引草对沙埋的生长和生理适应对策[J].生态学报,2012,32(14):4291-4299.
[9] 张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理实验指南[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[10] 杨慧玲,曹志平,董鸣,等.沙埋对无芒雀麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].应用生态学,2007,18(11):2438-2443.
[11] 黄修梅,郝丽珍,张凤兰,等.沙埋对毛乌素沙地沙芥和斧形沙芥幼苗生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(7):194-198.
[12] Maun M A.The effects of burial by sand on survival and growth of Calamovilfa longifolia[J].Ecoscience,1996,3:93-100.
[13] Maun M A.Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes[J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1998,76:713-738
[14] 周瑞莲,王海鸥.在干旱、高温胁迫中沙生植物抗脱水性与膜脂过氧化关系的研究[J].中国沙漠,1996,19(1):60-64.
[15] Hernandez J A,Almansa M S.Short-term effects of salt stress on antioxidant systems and leaf water relations of pea leaves[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2002,115:251-257.
[16] 郜俊红,梁宗锁,赵荣艳,等.水分胁迫对不同小麦品种幼苗生理特性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(10):141-145.
[17] 郭洪雪,宋希云,燕增文,等.高温胁迫对小麦幼苗几个生理生化指标的影响[J].华北农学报,2007,22(增刊):71-74.
[18] Bai L P,Sui F G,Ge T D,et al.Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status,membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize[J].Pedosphere,2006,16:326-332.
[19] Pagter M,Bragato C,Brix H.Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australisto water deficit[J].Aquatic Botany,2005,81:285-299.
[20] Qayyum A,Razzaq A,Ahmad,M,et al.Water stress causes differential effects on germination indices,total soluble sugar and proline content in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes[J].Africa Journal Biotechnology,2011,10:14038-14045.
[21] Bowler C C,Van Montagu.Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance[J].Annual Review of Plan Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1992,43:83-116.
[22] 张永峰,殷波.混合盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(1):46-50.