Journal of Desert Research ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 195-204.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00088
Bing Jia1,2(), Jianhua Si1(
), Zhibo Wu3, Shi Qi1, Lili Ma4, Xinglin Zhu1,2, Jie Qin1,2, Funian Shi5
Received:
2022-07-25
Revised:
2022-09-06
Online:
2023-03-20
Published:
2023-04-12
Contact:
Jianhua Si
CLC Number:
Bing Jia, Jianhua Si, Zhibo Wu, Shi Qi, Lili Ma, Xinglin Zhu, Jie Qin, Funian Shi. Effects of seed pelleting in aerial seeding on vegetation and soil[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 195-204.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00088
飞播时间 | 采样区域 | 地理位置 | 飞播植物 |
---|---|---|---|
2017年5月30日—7月28日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 38°25′41.7″N,104°42′25.8″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°20′06.9″N,103°51′15.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2018年5月31日—7月30日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 39°42′29.2″N,104°17′58.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°32′10.5″N,103°39′39.6″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2019年5月31日—8月10日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 38°47′21.8″N,104°18′08.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°46′55.8″N,104°20′27.0″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2020年6月6日—8月6日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 40°34′33.5″N,105°03′46.9″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 40°35′22.2″N,104°59′09.6″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
Table 1 Spatial location and time of 8 sampling sites in the aerial seeding area
飞播时间 | 采样区域 | 地理位置 | 飞播植物 |
---|---|---|---|
2017年5月30日—7月28日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 38°25′41.7″N,104°42′25.8″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°20′06.9″N,103°51′15.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2018年5月31日—7月30日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 39°42′29.2″N,104°17′58.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°32′10.5″N,103°39′39.6″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2019年5月31日—8月10日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 38°47′21.8″N,104°18′08.4″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 38°46′55.8″N,104°20′27.0″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 | |
2020年6月6日—8月6日 | 未丸粒化播区 | 40°34′33.5″N,105°03′46.9″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
丸粒化播区 | 40°35′22.2″N,104°59′09.6″E | 花棒、沙拐枣、沙蒿 |
飞播年 | 飞播植物指标 | 丸粒化播区 | 未丸粒播区 |
---|---|---|---|
2020年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 1.192±0.882Aa | 0.832±0.765Aa |
植被盖度/% | 0.344±0.181Bb | 0.559±0.527Bb | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.444±0.325Ab | 0.094±0.085Bb | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.007±0.003Ab | 0.016±0.008Ab | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.451±0.327Ab | 0.110±0.089Ab | |
2019年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.021±0.017Ab | 0.015±0.011Ab |
植被盖度/% | 0.462±0.309Ab | 0.316±0.168Ab | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 2.077±1.500Ab | 1.195±1.745Ab | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 1.187±0.857Ab | 0.683±0.846Ab | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 3.264±2.358Ab | 1.878±2.591Ab | |
2018年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.713±1.315Aab | 0.083±0.012Bb |
植被盖度/% | 18.453±19.340Ab | 14.67±11.378Aa | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 291.281±347.081Ab | 34.351±17.385Ba | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 108.334±137.032Ab | 14.265±8.932Ba | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 399.615±483.827Ab | 51.736±26.317Ba | |
2017年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.123±0.073Aab | 0.017±0.011Bb |
植被盖度/% | 41.511±22.059Aa | 0.608±0.569Bb | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 1188.070±858.596Aa | 6.322±4.238Bb | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 390.871±314.328Aa | 2.849±1.680Bb | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 1578.945±1172.818Aa | 9.171±5.915Bb |
Table 2 Vegetation density, coverage and biomass of aerial seeding in different years
飞播年 | 飞播植物指标 | 丸粒化播区 | 未丸粒播区 |
---|---|---|---|
2020年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 1.192±0.882Aa | 0.832±0.765Aa |
植被盖度/% | 0.344±0.181Bb | 0.559±0.527Bb | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.444±0.325Ab | 0.094±0.085Bb | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.007±0.003Ab | 0.016±0.008Ab | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 0.451±0.327Ab | 0.110±0.089Ab | |
2019年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.021±0.017Ab | 0.015±0.011Ab |
植被盖度/% | 0.462±0.309Ab | 0.316±0.168Ab | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 2.077±1.500Ab | 1.195±1.745Ab | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 1.187±0.857Ab | 0.683±0.846Ab | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 3.264±2.358Ab | 1.878±2.591Ab | |
2018年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.713±1.315Aab | 0.083±0.012Bb |
植被盖度/% | 18.453±19.340Ab | 14.67±11.378Aa | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 291.281±347.081Ab | 34.351±17.385Ba | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 108.334±137.032Ab | 14.265±8.932Ba | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 399.615±483.827Ab | 51.736±26.317Ba | |
2017年 | 植被密度/(株·m-2) | 0.123±0.073Aab | 0.017±0.011Bb |
植被盖度/% | 41.511±22.059Aa | 0.608±0.569Bb | |
地上生物量/(g·m-2) | 1188.070±858.596Aa | 6.322±4.238Bb | |
地下生物量/(g·m-2) | 390.871±314.328Aa | 2.849±1.680Bb | |
总生物量/(g·m-2) | 1578.945±1172.818Aa | 9.171±5.915Bb |
播区名称 | 播区面积 /hm2 | 平均每公顷 株数/株 | 有苗样地数 /个 | 有苗样地平均株数/株 | 有苗样地 频度/% | 成苗面积 /hm2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沙拐枣 | 花棒 | 沙蒿 | ||||||
丸粒化播区 | 1 969 | 11 420 | 29 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 24.2 | 447.2 |
未丸粒化播区 | 1 814 | 2 220 | 10 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.3 | 142.4 |
Table 3 Emergence rate of non-pelleted and pelleted seeds
播区名称 | 播区面积 /hm2 | 平均每公顷 株数/株 | 有苗样地数 /个 | 有苗样地平均株数/株 | 有苗样地 频度/% | 成苗面积 /hm2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沙拐枣 | 花棒 | 沙蒿 | ||||||
丸粒化播区 | 1 969 | 11 420 | 29 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 24.2 | 447.2 |
未丸粒化播区 | 1 814 | 2 220 | 10 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.3 | 142.4 |
Fig. 3 Changes of soil water content, organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus content with soil depth in different years of aerial seeding
年份 | Sobs | Shannon | Simpson | ACE | Chao1 | Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 795 | 4.82 | 0.025 | 815.61 | 812.27 | 99.86 |
2017 | 1 166 | 5.15 | 0.025 | 1 172.24 | 1 168.97 | 99.94 |
Table 4 Soil microbial richness and diversity index in different aerial seeding years
年份 | Sobs | Shannon | Simpson | ACE | Chao1 | Coverage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 795 | 4.82 | 0.025 | 815.61 | 812.27 | 99.86 |
2017 | 1 166 | 5.15 | 0.025 | 1 172.24 | 1 168.97 | 99.94 |
1 | Le Houerou H N.Restoration and rehabilitation of arid and semiarid Mediterranean ecosystems in North Africa and West Asia:a review[J].Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation,2000,14:3-14. |
2 | 《中国飞播造林四十年》编委会.中国飞播造林四十年[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998. |
3 | 弓晓倩,姚林杰,张佳宁,等.毛乌素沙地不同飞播造林年限土壤真菌群落结构特征[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(1):90-97. |
4 | 陈佳卉,卜元坤,苏少峰,等.油松飞播林灌木层主要物种种间联结及其环境解释[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3512-3522. |
5 | 慕宗杰,刘果厚,桂荣,等.浑善达克沙地飞播区不同恢复阶段植物群落结构动态变化[J].华中农业大学学报,2020,39(4):46-56. |
6 | Li X J, Li Y F, Xie T,et al.Recovery of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks following afforestation with xerophytic shrubs in the Tengger Desert,North China[J].Catena,2022,214:106277. |
7 | Verrecchia E, Yair A, Kidron G J,et al.Physical properties of the psammophile cryptogamic crust and their consequences to the water regime of sandy soils, northwestern Negev Desert Israel[J].Journal of Arid Environments,1995,29:427-437. |
8 | 李新荣,肖洪浪,刘立超,等.腾格里沙漠沙坡头地区固沙植被对生物多样性恢复的长期影响[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):173-181. |
9 | 武智双.内蒙古封山育林和飞播造林成效及其管理[J].内蒙古林业科技,2016,42(3):62-64. |
10 | 王文舒,武志博,刘宏义.花棒种子成苗降雨量及丸粒化技术研究[J].安徽农业科学,2022, 50(10):75-78. |
11 | 武志博,刘宏义,白莹,等.飞播沙拐枣成苗降雨量及基于该降雨量下的种子丸粒化技术探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(10):162-166. |
12 | 王东海.种子包衣技术课题细化到工厂育苗和飞播技术探究[J].农业与技术,2014,34(7):98. |
13 | 康世勇,夏素华,李志忠,等.鄂尔多斯沙区飞播杨柴固沙技术的研究[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(1):57-63. |
14 | 雅洁,朱振华,董建林.毛乌素沙地飞播后植被演替规律研究:以内蒙古乌审旗为例[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2008(6):1-4. |
15 | 刘庆福.毛乌素沙地沙漠化演变、飞播恢复评估及其对生态系统服务的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2020. |
16 | 贺宇.沙生种子萌发特性及沙地飞播成效研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013. |
17 | Liu Q F, Zhang Q, Jarvie S,et al.Ecosystem restoration through aerial seeding: interacting plant-soil microbiome effects on soil multifunctionality[J].Land Degradation & Development, 2021, 32:5334-5347. |
18 | 付华,周志宇,陈善科.腾格里沙漠东南缘飞播区白沙蒿植被密度与土壤水分关系的研究[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(3):265-270. |
19 | 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:146-226. |
20 | Blau K, Casadevall L, Wolters B,et al.Soil texture-depending effects of doxycycline and streptomycin applied with manure on the bacterial community composition and resistome[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2017,94(2):1-11. |
21 | 欧成明,毛培胜.牧草种子包衣技术研究与应用进展[J].种子,2019,38(11):63-67. |
22 | 侯占峰,陈利杰,陈智.牧草种子丸粒化包衣运动规律与参数优选研究[J].农机化研究,2021,43(11):184-191. |
23 | 杨波,宝音陶格涛.退化羊草草原轻耙处理后30年植物群落恢复演替规律研究[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(2):36-42. |
24 | 彭海英,李小雁,童绍玉.内蒙古典型草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对水分再分配和利用的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(9): 2256-2265. |
25 | 闫宝龙,吕世杰,王忠武,等.草地灌丛化成因及其对生态系统的影响研究进展[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(2):95-101. |
26 | 苏永中,赵哈林,张铜会.科尔沁沙地不同年代小叶锦鸡儿人工林植物群落特征及其土壤特性[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):93-100. |
27 | 戴雅婷,侯向阳,闫志坚,等 .库布齐沙地两种植被恢复类型根际土壤微生物和土壤化学性质比较研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(20):6353-6364. |
28 | 肖洪浪,李新荣,段争虎,等.流沙固定过程中土壤-植被系统演变[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(6): 2-8. |
29 | 赵晨光,李慧瑛,鱼腾飞,等.腾格里沙漠东北缘人工植被对土壤物理性质的影响[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(4): 1112-1121. |
30 | 张洋,刘华,王得祥,等.商洛地区不同林龄油松人工林土壤理化性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):82-89. |
31 | 肖华翠,李靖雯,夏允,等.中亚热带不同母质发育森林土壤磷组分特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):16-22. |
32 | 周虹,刘雲祥.青海共和盆地人工固沙植被恢复对土壤微生物数量的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(1):178-184. |
33 | 靳正忠,雷加强,徐新文,等.流沙区不同立地条件下防护林土壤微生物多样性分析[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(6):1430-1436. |
34 | Hossain M Z, Sugiyama S I.Relative importance of soil microbes and litter quality on decomposition and nitrogen cycling in grasslands[J].Ecological Research,2020,35(5):912-924. |
35 | Chaer G, Femandes M, Myrold D,et al.Comparative resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in adjacent native forest and agricultural soils[J].Microbial Ecology, 2009, 58(2):414-424. |
[1] | Xingchi Jiang, Wensuyalatu, Junyao Li, Feng Chen, Jinyu Hu, Guolin Wang, Sujuan Qing, Jiannan Lu, Shaokun Wang. Study on storage of soil surface carbon and nitrogen and its influencing factors in UradNational Nature Reserve of Haloxylon ammodendron based on SHAP values [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 170-183. |
[2] | Funing Yang, Lü Ping, Fang Ma, Min Cao, Nan Xiao, Lixia Gu, Ying Yang. Morphological evolution and migration characteristics of reticulate dunes at southern fringe of Tengger Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 107-115. |
[3] | Yuqing Chen, Haiyang Xi, Wenju Cheng, Xinyue Zhao. Characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen change in three typical plant communities in desert riparian forest area [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 150-159. |
[4] | Haixiu He, Aihong Fu, Chuan Wang. Negetation index change and its driving forces of low mountain meadow vegetation in the northwest of Tacheng Region, Xinjiang, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 187-196. |
[5] | Xinyue Zhao, Haiyang Xi, Jing Zhao, Kehua Ma, Wenju Cheng, Yuqing Chen. Inversion and spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in Alxa area, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 27-36. |
[6] | Nan Wang, Yanqiao Zhao, Wenwen Xu, Jingyao Sun, Chengyi Li, Yang Zhao. Growth characteristics of two desert cyanobacteria and their influence on culture solution microenvironment [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(1): 66-74. |
[7] | Lijuan Wang, Ni Guo, Sha Sha, Die Hu. Influencing factors of surface energy conversion in Northwest China and applicability of characteristic space method [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 1-13. |
[8] | Yaofang Hou, Shengkui Cao, Guangchao Cao, Zhigang Wang, Youcai Wang, Ligang Kang. Relationship between hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope compositions of soil water and soil water storage in Shaliuhe River Basin of Qinghai Lake [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 153-164. |
[9] | Qiang Li, Simin Liu, Guanlong Gao, Xiaoyou Zhang. Variation and simulation of surface soil heat flux in Ejin Oasis [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 176-184. |
[10] | Guangyu Hong, Xiaojiang Wang, Tieshan Liu, Hailong, Zhenting Wu, Huercha, Xiaowei Gao, Haifeng Yang, Zhuofan Li, Zihao Li, Siqin, Lejun Wang. Applicability of Hydrus-1D Model in simulating the soil moisture in Hedysarum leave in Mu Us Sandy Land, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 233-242. |
[11] | Lin Li, Hu Liu, Chengpeng Sun, Wenzhi Zhao. Groundwater evapotranspiration estimation based on soil moisture and water table measurements [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 277-287. |
[12] | Meilan Zhang, Zengtuan Cui, Zhiheng Dun, Ruihong Jia, Yuxia Zhang, Shiqian Guo, Qianyi Cui, Chenxuan Ge, Liqun Cai, Bo Dong. The Spatial-temporal variance characteristic of soil organic carbon in cultivited land of Gansu Province and its influencing factors in the 40 years from 1980 to 2020 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 295-303. |
[13] | Jingting Bao, Jingyao Sun, Jin Wang. A review on microbial community assembly in biological soil crusts [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 33-43. |
[14] | Shilong Li. Soil physicochemical properties of alpine grasslands under different desertification degrees in Maqu, Gansu, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 44-52. |
[15] | Jiawang Yin, Ala Musa, Yuhang Su. Effects of dune vegetation on water dynamics in interdune lowland in the Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 194-203. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
©2018Journal of Desert Research
Tel:0931-8267545
Email:caiedit@lzb.ac.cn;desert@lzb.ac.cn
Support:Magtech