Journal of Desert Research ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 55-67.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00022
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wenhui Zhang1(), Kaijia Pan2, Siqi Wang1, Yunzhu Lei1, Zhengcai Zhang1(
)
Received:
2025-01-14
Revised:
2025-03-10
Online:
2025-09-20
Published:
2025-09-27
Contact:
Zhengcai Zhang
CLC Number:
Wenhui Zhang, Kaijia Pan, Siqi Wang, Yunzhu Lei, Zhengcai Zhang. Characteristics of sand transport rate and particle size of various land surface in the Taklimakan Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(5): 55-67.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.desert.ac.cn/EN/10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2025.00022
监测站名称(编号) | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 地表类型 | 地表平均粒径/Φ |
---|---|---|---|---|
和田克里雅河区域东部(1) | 82°47′10″ | 39°41′47″ | 格状沙丘 | 3.16 |
和田克里雅河区域北部(2) | 80°57′42″ | 39°09′52″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.75 |
和田克里雅河区域南部(3) | 80°55′24″ | 38°18′47″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.03 |
中部三角洲平原区南部(4) | 82°56′05″ | 37°41′04″ | 线性沙丘 | 3.52 |
中部三角洲平原区中部(5) | 83°55′50″ | 38°46′15″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.73 |
中部三角洲平原区北部(6) | 84°20′28″ | 40°12′57″ | 格状沙丘 | 3.12 |
罗布泊河湖平原区北部(7) | 87°04′51″ | 40°57′40″ | 灌丛沙堆 | 1.84 |
罗布泊河湖平原区南部(8) | 88°56′43″ | 39°12′04″ | 戈壁 | 2.78 |
Table 1 Geographical location and surface characteristics of monitoring sites
监测站名称(编号) | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 地表类型 | 地表平均粒径/Φ |
---|---|---|---|---|
和田克里雅河区域东部(1) | 82°47′10″ | 39°41′47″ | 格状沙丘 | 3.16 |
和田克里雅河区域北部(2) | 80°57′42″ | 39°09′52″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.75 |
和田克里雅河区域南部(3) | 80°55′24″ | 38°18′47″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.03 |
中部三角洲平原区南部(4) | 82°56′05″ | 37°41′04″ | 线性沙丘 | 3.52 |
中部三角洲平原区中部(5) | 83°55′50″ | 38°46′15″ | 格状沙丘 | 2.73 |
中部三角洲平原区北部(6) | 84°20′28″ | 40°12′57″ | 格状沙丘 | 3.12 |
罗布泊河湖平原区北部(7) | 87°04′51″ | 40°57′40″ | 灌丛沙堆 | 1.84 |
罗布泊河湖平原区南部(8) | 88°56′43″ | 39°12′04″ | 戈壁 | 2.78 |
监测站编号 | 黏土 | 粉沙 | 极细沙 | 细沙 | 中沙 | 粗沙 | 极粗沙 | 砾石 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.00 | 5.38 | 54.66 | 38.76 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
2 | 0.00 | 7.61 | 38.37 | 38.45 | 14.83 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
3 | 0.00 | 5.15 | 21.40 | 8.41 | 9.91 | 42.34 | 12.79 | 0.00 |
4 | 0.00 | 25.90 | 49.28 | 14.61 | 1.22 | 6.38 | 2.56 | 0.05 |
5 | 0.00 | 5.99 | 51.73 | 36.46 | 2.13 | 3.09 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
6 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 58.33 | 36.28 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
7 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 7.38 | 33.92 | 48.65 | 8.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
8 | 0.03 | 2.11 | 5.08 | 6.52 | 2.24 | 1.22 | 3.35 | 79.45 |
Table 2 Percentage of the particles among monitoring sites
监测站编号 | 黏土 | 粉沙 | 极细沙 | 细沙 | 中沙 | 粗沙 | 极粗沙 | 砾石 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.00 | 5.38 | 54.66 | 38.76 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
2 | 0.00 | 7.61 | 38.37 | 38.45 | 14.83 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
3 | 0.00 | 5.15 | 21.40 | 8.41 | 9.91 | 42.34 | 12.79 | 0.00 |
4 | 0.00 | 25.90 | 49.28 | 14.61 | 1.22 | 6.38 | 2.56 | 0.05 |
5 | 0.00 | 5.99 | 51.73 | 36.46 | 2.13 | 3.09 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
6 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 58.33 | 36.28 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
7 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 7.38 | 33.92 | 48.65 | 8.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
8 | 0.03 | 2.11 | 5.08 | 6.52 | 2.24 | 1.22 | 3.35 | 79.45 |
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | Q(月输沙率)/(kg·m-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a1 | b1 | c1 | ||||
1-T1 | 8.85 | 33.52 | -5.75 | 0.96 | <0.05 | 27.95 |
1-T2 | 0.03 | 7.85 | -0.90 | 0.90 | <0.05 | 7.88 |
2-T1 | 5.96 | 56.39 | -7.83 | 0.98 | <0.05 | 22.10 |
2-T2 | 0.91 | 8.92 | -2.30 | 0.93 | <0.05 | 6.14 |
3-T2 | 0.52 | 12.41 | -7.57 | 0.90 | <0.05 | 2.94 |
4-T1 | 2.45 | 44.44 | -4.25 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 16.58 |
4-T2 | 0.40 | 21.85 | -5.92 | 0.99 | <0.05 | 4.69 |
5-T1 | 3.52 | 62.69 | -5.56 | 0.99 | <0.05 | 20.08 |
5-T2 | 0.94 | 6.58 | -1.30 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 7.22 |
6-T1 | 1.37 | 19.35 | -1.95 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 13.27 |
6-T2 | 0.34 | 2.10 | -0.61 | 0.91 | <0.05 | 3.54 |
7-T2 | 0.15 | 0.91 | -3.19 | 0.92 | <0.05 | 0.66 |
8-T1 | 1.54 | 59.13 | -4.42 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 17.23 |
8-T2 | 1.39 | 82.03 | -6.63 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 15.85 |
Table 3 Fitting parameters of sediment transport rate with height
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | Q(月输沙率)/(kg·m-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a1 | b1 | c1 | ||||
1-T1 | 8.85 | 33.52 | -5.75 | 0.96 | <0.05 | 27.95 |
1-T2 | 0.03 | 7.85 | -0.90 | 0.90 | <0.05 | 7.88 |
2-T1 | 5.96 | 56.39 | -7.83 | 0.98 | <0.05 | 22.10 |
2-T2 | 0.91 | 8.92 | -2.30 | 0.93 | <0.05 | 6.14 |
3-T2 | 0.52 | 12.41 | -7.57 | 0.90 | <0.05 | 2.94 |
4-T1 | 2.45 | 44.44 | -4.25 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 16.58 |
4-T2 | 0.40 | 21.85 | -5.92 | 0.99 | <0.05 | 4.69 |
5-T1 | 3.52 | 62.69 | -5.56 | 0.99 | <0.05 | 20.08 |
5-T2 | 0.94 | 6.58 | -1.30 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 7.22 |
6-T1 | 1.37 | 19.35 | -1.95 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 13.27 |
6-T2 | 0.34 | 2.10 | -0.61 | 0.91 | <0.05 | 3.54 |
7-T2 | 0.15 | 0.91 | -3.19 | 0.92 | <0.05 | 0.66 |
8-T1 | 1.54 | 59.13 | -4.42 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 17.23 |
8-T2 | 1.39 | 82.03 | -6.63 | 1.00 | <0.05 | 15.85 |
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a2 | b2 | c2 | |||
1-T1 | 3.47 | -0.33 | -6.87 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
1-T2 | 3.46 | -0.28 | -81.67 | 0.86 | <0.05 |
2-T1 | 3.56 | -0.68 | -14.06 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
2-T2 | 3.56 | -0.94 | -19.82 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
3-T1 | 0.00 | -1.00 | — | 0.00 | <0.05 |
3-T2 | 3.66 | -1.07 | -7.53 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
4-T1 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
4-T2 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 0.95 | <0.05 |
5-T1 | 3.49 | -0.19 | -3.54 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
5-T2 | 3.38 | -1.22 | -20.74 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
6-T1 | 3.72 | -0.54 | -1.93 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
6-T2 | 3.67 | -0.61 | -6.10 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
7-T1 | 3.53 | -1.64 | -4.76 | 0.87 | <0.05 |
7-T2 | 3.65 | -1.88 | -7.13 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
8-T1 | 2.72 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.91 | <0.05 |
8-T2 | 6.79 | -4.16 | -0.27 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
Table 4 Fitting parameters of average particle size with height
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a2 | b2 | c2 | |||
1-T1 | 3.47 | -0.33 | -6.87 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
1-T2 | 3.46 | -0.28 | -81.67 | 0.86 | <0.05 |
2-T1 | 3.56 | -0.68 | -14.06 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
2-T2 | 3.56 | -0.94 | -19.82 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
3-T1 | 0.00 | -1.00 | — | 0.00 | <0.05 |
3-T2 | 3.66 | -1.07 | -7.53 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
4-T1 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
4-T2 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 0.95 | <0.05 |
5-T1 | 3.49 | -0.19 | -3.54 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
5-T2 | 3.38 | -1.22 | -20.74 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
6-T1 | 3.72 | -0.54 | -1.93 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
6-T2 | 3.67 | -0.61 | -6.10 | 0.98 | <0.05 |
7-T1 | 3.53 | -1.64 | -4.76 | 0.87 | <0.05 |
7-T2 | 3.65 | -1.88 | -7.13 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
8-T1 | 2.72 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.91 | <0.05 |
8-T2 | 6.79 | -4.16 | -0.27 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a3 | b3 | c3 | |||
1-T1 | 17.39 | -12.09 | -4.57 | 0.88 | <0.05 |
1-T2 | 17.22 | -11.69 | -84.83 | 0.84 | <0.05 |
2-T1 | 23.23 | -15.61 | -9.07 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
2-T2 | 22.61 | -17.87 | -10.86 | 0.96 | <0.05 |
3-T1 | 0.00 | -1.00 | — | 0.00 | — |
3-T2 | 28.24 | -16.62 | -5.10 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
4-T1 | 28.62 | 0.26 | 2.00 | 0.94 | <0.05 |
4-T2 | 26.46 | 1.94 | 1.10 | 0.87 | <0.05 |
5-T1 | 19.66 | -13.77 | -6.65 | 0.49 | 0.26 |
5-T2 | 15.16 | -9.51 | -8.02 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
6-T1 | 36.43 | -31.20 | -1.39 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
6-T2 | 31.13 | -26.65 | -4.70 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
7-T1 | 29.79 | -29.07 | -3.82 | 0.65 | 0.12 |
7-T2 | 33.49 | -33.50 | -5.12 | 0.85 | <0.05 |
8-T1 | 8.92 | 4.26 | 1.10 | 0.92 | <0.05 |
8-T2 | 0.00 | 17.67 | 0.53 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
Table 5 Fitting parameters of percentage content of <63 μm grain grades with height
监测站-时段 | 拟合系数 | R2 | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a3 | b3 | c3 | |||
1-T1 | 17.39 | -12.09 | -4.57 | 0.88 | <0.05 |
1-T2 | 17.22 | -11.69 | -84.83 | 0.84 | <0.05 |
2-T1 | 23.23 | -15.61 | -9.07 | 0.99 | <0.05 |
2-T2 | 22.61 | -17.87 | -10.86 | 0.96 | <0.05 |
3-T1 | 0.00 | -1.00 | — | 0.00 | — |
3-T2 | 28.24 | -16.62 | -5.10 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
4-T1 | 28.62 | 0.26 | 2.00 | 0.94 | <0.05 |
4-T2 | 26.46 | 1.94 | 1.10 | 0.87 | <0.05 |
5-T1 | 19.66 | -13.77 | -6.65 | 0.49 | 0.26 |
5-T2 | 15.16 | -9.51 | -8.02 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
6-T1 | 36.43 | -31.20 | -1.39 | 1.00 | <0.05 |
6-T2 | 31.13 | -26.65 | -4.70 | 0.97 | <0.05 |
7-T1 | 29.79 | -29.07 | -3.82 | 0.65 | 0.12 |
7-T2 | 33.49 | -33.50 | -5.12 | 0.85 | <0.05 |
8-T1 | 8.92 | 4.26 | 1.10 | 0.92 | <0.05 |
8-T2 | 0.00 | 17.67 | 0.53 | 0.90 | <0.05 |
时段 | 监测站编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
T1 | 2.48 | 2.32 | 2.96 | 3.32 | 2.82 | 2.66 | 2.03 | 4.19 |
T2 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 1.80 | 2.46 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 1.41 | 2.97 |
Table 6 Wind speed (m·s-1 ) at each monitoring sites and time period
时段 | 监测站编号 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
T1 | 2.48 | 2.32 | 2.96 | 3.32 | 2.82 | 2.66 | 2.03 | 4.19 |
T2 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 1.80 | 2.46 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 1.41 | 2.97 |
监测站-时段 | 大于起沙风的平均风速/(m·s-1) | 分选系数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地表 | 0.25 m | 0.5 m | 1 m | 1.5 m | 2 m | 2.5 m | ||
P | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | |
1-T1 | 5.41 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 1.50 |
1-T2 | 5.12 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.48 |
2-T1 | 5.40 | 1.77 | 1.48 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.81 |
2-T2 | 5.85 | 1.74 | 1.46 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.49 |
3-T1 | 8.31 | 2.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3-T2 | 5.76 | 2.66 | 1.61 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 2.38 |
4-T1 | 5.31 | 2.13 | 1.52 | 1.53 | 1.62 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 3.45 |
4-T2 | 4.74 | 2.19 | 1.51 | 1.57 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.70 | 3.58 |
5-T1 | 5.78 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 1.41 |
5-T2 | 6.98 | 2.90 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.49 | 1.81 |
6-T1 | 6.21 | 1.42 | 1.45 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 1.67 | 1.74 | — |
6-T2 | 5.81 | 1.47 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.63 | — |
7-T1 | 7.22 | 1.66 | 2.47 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.90 |
7-T2 | 7.38 | 1.47 | 1.93 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 2.17 | 2.39 |
8-T1 | 6.88 | 2.4 | 1.88 | 2.29 | 1.81 | 1.95 | 1.90 | 3.55 |
8-T2 | 7.08 | 3.43 | 2.03 | 2.13 | 2.02 | 2.04 | 2.10 | 5.16 |
Table 7 Average wind speed greater than the sand-moving wind speed, sorting coefficient and fitting results
监测站-时段 | 大于起沙风的平均风速/(m·s-1) | 分选系数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地表 | 0.25 m | 0.5 m | 1 m | 1.5 m | 2 m | 2.5 m | ||
P | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | |
1-T1 | 5.41 | 1.45 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 1.50 |
1-T2 | 5.12 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.48 |
2-T1 | 5.40 | 1.77 | 1.48 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.81 |
2-T2 | 5.85 | 1.74 | 1.46 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.49 |
3-T1 | 8.31 | 2.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3-T2 | 5.76 | 2.66 | 1.61 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.54 | 1.54 | 2.38 |
4-T1 | 5.31 | 2.13 | 1.52 | 1.53 | 1.62 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 3.45 |
4-T2 | 4.74 | 2.19 | 1.51 | 1.57 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.70 | 3.58 |
5-T1 | 5.78 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 1.41 |
5-T2 | 6.98 | 2.90 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.49 | 1.81 |
6-T1 | 6.21 | 1.42 | 1.45 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 1.67 | 1.74 | — |
6-T2 | 5.81 | 1.47 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.63 | — |
7-T1 | 7.22 | 1.66 | 2.47 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.90 |
7-T2 | 7.38 | 1.47 | 1.93 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 2.17 | 2.39 |
8-T1 | 6.88 | 2.4 | 1.88 | 2.29 | 1.81 | 1.95 | 1.90 | 3.55 |
8-T2 | 7.08 | 3.43 | 2.03 | 2.13 | 2.02 | 2.04 | 2.10 | 5.16 |
[1] | 杨兴华,周成龙,杨帆,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地近地表输沙方向探测研究[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2019,13(6):105-110. |
[2] | Jia R, Liu Y, Chen B,et al.Source and transportation of summer dust over the Tibetan Plateau[J].Atmospheric Environment,2015,123:210-219. |
[3] | 雷加强,高鑫,赵永成,等.河西走廊-塔克拉玛干沙漠边缘阻击战:风沙形势与防治任务[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(7):966-977. |
[4] | 杨帆.塔克拉玛干沙漠固碳机理及碳汇能力评估[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023. |
[5] | 李得禄,满多清,朱国庆,等.丘间低地不同部位风沙流结构特征[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1210-1215. |
[6] | Bagnold R A.The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes[M].London,UK:Methuen,1941:265. |
[7] | 白子怡,董治宝,南维鸽,等.植被盖度对风沙流结构及输沙率的影响[J].中国沙漠,2024,44(2):25-34. |
[8] | 王翠,李生宇,雷加强,等.近地表风沙流结构对过渡带不同下垫面的响应[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):52-56+71. |
[9] | 王翠,雷加强,李生宇,等.策勒绿洲-沙漠过渡带风沙流挟沙粒度的垂直分异[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(2):230-238. |
[10] | 毛东雷,雷加强,王翠,等.新疆策勒县沙漠-绿洲过渡带风沙流结构及输沙粒度特征[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):25-33. |
[11] | Rice M A, Willetts B B, Mcewan I K.An experimental study of multiple grain-size ejecta produced by collisions of saltating grains with a flat bed[J].Sedimentology,1995,42(4):695-706. |
[12] | 陈京平,余子莹,杨帆,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地沙尘暴和地表沙物质粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2023,43(2):150-158. |
[13] | 代亚亚,何清,陆辉,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地复合型纵向沙垄区近地层沙尘水平通量及粒度特征[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(4):918-924. |
[14] | 杨兴华,何清,阿吉古丽·沙依提,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠北缘荒漠过渡带风沙流结构特征分析[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(4):699-704. |
[15] | 顿耀权,罗万银,邵梅,等.干旱区内陆湖盆沙尘水平通量及粒度特征:以青土湖地区为例[J].中国沙漠,2023,43(6):166-175. |
[16] | 包岩峰,丁国栋,吴斌,等.毛乌素沙地风沙流结构的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(2):118-123. |
[17] | 吴晓旭,邹学勇,王仁德,等.毛乌素沙地不同下垫面的风沙运动特征[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):828-835. |
[18] | 杨欢,李玉强,王旭洋,等.半干旱区不同类型沙丘风沙流结构特征[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(6):1144-1152. |
[19] | 张正偲,潘凯佳,张焱,等.中国西北戈壁区沙尘暴过程中近地层风沙运动特征[J].中国沙漠,2023,43(2):130-138. |
[20] | Zhang Z C, Han L Y, Pan K J.Sediment transport characteristics above a gobi surface in northwestern China,and implications for aeolian environments[J].Aeolian Research,2021,53:100745. |
[21] | 黎小娟,周智彬,李宁,等.尼龙网方格沙障风沙流携沙粒度的空间分异特征[J].中国沙漠,2018,38 (1):76-84. |
[22] | 周烨.塔克拉玛干沙漠表层沉积物特征及其对地表过程及古气候的指示意义[D].杭州:浙江大学,2024. |
[23] | 杜鹤强,韩致文,王涛,等.新月形沙丘表面风速廓线与风沙流结构变异研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(1):9-16. |
[24] | 杨兴华,何清,艾力·买买提明.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地塔中地区风沙流输沙特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2011,34(3):479-485. |
[25] | 康永德,杨兴华,何清,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地贴地层风沙流结构研究[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2017,11(2):74-81. |
[26] | Yang X H, Shen S H, Yang F,et al.Spatial and temporal variations of blowing dust events in the Taklimakan Desert[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2016,125(3/4):669-677. |
[27] | Zu R P, Xue X, Qiang M R,et al.Characteristics of near-surface wind regimes in the Taklimakan Desert,China[J].Geomorphology,2008,96(1/2):39-47. |
[28] | 俎瑞平,张克存,屈建军,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠地面风场特征及周边地区沙丘排列关系分析[J].应用气象学报,2005(4):468-475. |
[29] | Folk R L, Ward W C.Brasor rivers bars,a study in the significance of grain size parameters[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1957,27(1):3-26. |
[30] | Dong Z B, Liu X P, Wang H T,et al.The flux profile of a blowing sand cloud:a wind tunnel investigation[J].Geomorphology,2003,49(3/4):219-230. |
[31] | Gillette D A, Walker T R.Characteristics of airborne particles produced by wind erosion of sandy soil,high plains of west Texas[J].Soil Science,1977,123(2):97-110. |
[32] | Nickling W G.Grain-Size characteristics of sediment transported during dust storms[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1983,53(3):1011-1024. |
[33] | Jensen J L, Michael S.Estimation of some aeolian saltation transport parameters:a re-analysis of Williams' data[J].Sedimentology,1986,33(4):547-558. |
[34] | Tan L H, Zhang K, Wang H T.Vertical sand flux density and grain-size distributions for wind-blown sand over a gobi surface in Milan,southern Xinjiang,China[J].Frontiers in Environmental Science,2022,10:10.3389/ fenvs.2022.859631. |
[35] | 黄宁,辜艳丹.粉尘释放和沉积机制的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(11):1175-1184. |
[36] | 杨兴华,何清,艾力·买买提明.塔克拉玛干沙漠塔中地区春夏季风蚀起沙研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):770-776. |
[37] | Shao Y, Lu H.A simple expression for wind erosion threshold friction velocity[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2000,105(D17):22437-22443. |
[38] | 滕震礁.不同地表下粉尘释放机制的风洞实验研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2018. |
[39] | Sweeney M, McDonald E, Etyemezian V.Quantifying dust emissions from desert landforms,eastern Mojave Desert,USA[J].Geomorphology,2011,135(1/2):21-34. |
[1] | Keying Zhang, Xian Zhang, Shengbo Xie. Environmental characteristics of wind-sand along the Liuyuan-Golmud Expressway [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(5): 277-288. |
[2] | Yiru Liang, Ping Lv, Min Cao, Fang Ma, Zishu Xia, Junlin Yu, Jingyan Wu. Wind tunnel research into the effect of particle size distribution on sand ripple morphology [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2025, 45(1): 20-31. |
[3] | Yu Xing, Benli Liu, Tao Ma, Yimeng Wang. Wind erosion and dust emission in the core area of Hexi Corridor-Taklimakan Desert edge in 2000-2023 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(6): 330-341. |
[4] | Junpeng Lou, Diwen Cai, Wenyong Ma, Linlin Jiao. Grain size and element differentiation during aeolian processe in Otindag Sandy Land [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(5): 143-154. |
[5] | Jiaqi Xiao, Shengli Wu, Pengpeng Chen. Grain size and fractal characteristics of surface sediments of nebkhas in the lower reaches of Hetian River, Xinjiang, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(4): 24-36. |
[6] | Yiming Feng, Qi Lu, Bin Yao, Lei Xi, Xiaoming Cao, Yongping Liu, Huseng Ning. Management regionalization and zoning management tasks of battle against desertification in the core area of Hexi Corridor-Taklimakan Desert edge [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(4): 91-101. |
[7] | Aimin Li, Peichen Zhao, Zhiwen Han. The moving trajectory fitting based on three-dimensional digital model of barchan dunes [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(2): 48-56. |
[8] | Zhulei Dong, Xuegong Jiang, Nana Yi, Zhili Xu, Yuehe Hang, Shuiyan Yu. Numerical simulation of the influence of wind speed and vegetation on dust weather in Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(6): 29-39. |
[9] | Yayun Li, Wei Cheng, Ning Wang, Xin Li, Rui Gao. Comparative study on the characteristic of spring sandstorms and the related meteorological factors of the Taklimakan Desert and Gobi Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 1-9. |
[10] | Qingshuang Meng, Hejun Zuo, Min Yan, Haibing Wang, Cheng Xi. Relationship between constant elements and granularity of the surface sediment in the Kubuqi Desert [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 107-117. |
[11] | Xueyang Guo, Linhai Yang, Liangqing Cheng, Guangyin Hu, Jingjing Hu. Physical and chemical characteristics of aeolian sands in Jiudong Sandy Land of Hexi Corridor and its environmental significance [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 17-30. |
[12] | Guocheng Yang, Donglei Mao, Minzhong Wang, Jiantao Zhang, Honglin Pan. Calculation and analysis of summer stable boundary layer height in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(4): 64-75. |
[13] | Yawei Fan, Heqiang Du, Shanlong Lu, Zhiwen Han, Xiufan Liu, Xinlei Liu. Surface particle size composition and aeolian-sand flow structure of Zuo Lake Basin in the source of Yangtze River [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(3): 47-56. |
[14] | Jingping Chen, Ziying Yu, Fan Yang, Mi Wang, Han Hu, Guanzhong Ni, Xin Gao, Xin Wang. Particle size characteristics of sandstorm and surface sand at Tazhong area of Taklimakan Desert, China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43(2): 150-158. |
[15] | Wen Zhang, Dingding Du, Zhiwen Li, Wangyang Wu, Xiangjie Li, Yonghui Bai. Grain size characteristics of sediments in sandy land around the Poyang Lake and its influencing factors [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(5): 122-132. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
©2018Journal of Desert Research
Tel:0931-8267545
Email:caiedit@lzb.ac.cn;desert@lzb.ac.cn
Support:Magtech