长江黄河源区生态环境脆弱性评价初探

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于综合性原则、主导因子原则和可操作性原则, 确定了长江黄河源区生态环境脆弱性的评价指标。依据县一级行政单位将长江黄河源区分为八大地区, 使用主成分分析法对各地区的生态环境进行综合评价, 基本可把源区的生态环境脆弱度分为五级: 极脆弱型、强脆弱型、中脆弱型、轻脆弱型和微脆弱型。黄河源区的达日和玛沁县脆弱程度最高, 为极脆弱地区; 称多县为强脆弱地区; 玛多和杂多县脆弱程度中等, 为中脆弱地区; 治多和曲麻莱县属于轻脆弱地区, 长江源区西南部的唐古拉山乡脆弱度最小, 属于微脆弱地区。

关键词: 长江黄河源区, 生态环境, 脆弱性, 评价

Abstract:

Air temperature, precipitation, altitude above sea level, glaciers, vegetation coverage, population density, gross output value in animal husbandry, and gross output value in agriculture are made into assessment indicators in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers according to four assessment principles of ecological environment vulnerability in this paper. The source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers are divided into eight areas based on the boundaries of Maduo, Maqin, Dari, Chengduo, Zhiduo, Qumalai and Zaduo counties, and Tanggulashan village. The ecological environments in each area are assessed synthetically using Principal Component Analysis. Eco-environmental vulnerable degree in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers is basically ranked into five ranks: very strong fragile, strong fragile, moderate fragile, slight fragile, and very slight fragile. Fragile degree in Dari and Maqin counties in the source region of the Yellow River is the maximal. They belong to very strong fragile. Chengduo county is strong fragile. Mauo and Zaduo counties are moderate fragile. Zhiduo and Qumalai are slight fragile. Tanggulashan village in the source region of the Yangtze River is very slight fragile.

Key words: source regions of the Yangtze River and Yellow rivers, ecological environment, vulnerability, assessment

杨建平;丁永建;陈仁升. 长江黄河源区生态环境脆弱性评价初探[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(6): 1012-1017.

YANG Jian-ping;DING Yong-jian;CHEN Ren-sheng. Assessment of Eco-environmental Vulnerability in the Source Regions of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2007, 27(6): 1012-1017.

参考文献

[1]Doerfliger N.Water vulnerability assessment in Karst environments:a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools[J]. Environmental Geology,1999,39（2）：165-176.
[2]Gogu R C，Dassargues A.Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods[J].Environment Geology,2000,39（6）:549-559.
[3]姜桂华.地下水脆弱性研究进展[J].世界地质,2002,21(1):33-38.
[4]马金珠.塔里木盆地南缘地下水脆弱性评价[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(2): 170-174.
[5]田喜洲.试论生态旅游资源的脆弱性及其保护[J].生态经济,2001(12):56-58.
[6]刘希林.泥石流风险评价[M].成都:四川科技出版社,2003.
[7]商彦蕊.河北省农业旱灾脆弱性区划与减灾[J].灾害学,2001,16(3):28-37.
[8]赵平,彭少麟,张经炜.生态系统的脆弱性与退化生态系统[J].热带亚热带植物学报,1998,6(3):179-186.
[9]王小丹,钟祥浩.生态环境脆弱性概念的若干问题探讨[J].山地学报,2003,21(增刊):21-25.
[10]罗新正,朱坦,徐鹤,等.河北迁西县山区生态环境脆弱性分区初探[J].山地学报,2002,20（3）:348-353.
[11]Bradley M P,Smith E R.Using science to assess environmental vulnerabilities[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2004,94: 1-7.
[12]Smith E R.An overview of EPA’s regional vulnerability assessment (ReVA) program[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2000,64:9-15.
[13]The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Environmental assessment-Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region[J].Environmental Management,2002,29(6):845-859.
[14]苏维词,杨汉奎.贵州岩溶区生态环境脆弱性的初步划分[J].环境科学研究,1994,7(6):35-40.
[15]吴建国,常学向.荒漠生态系统健康评价的探索[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):604-611.
[16]赵跃龙,刘燕华.中国脆弱生态环境类型划分及其范围确定[J].云南地理环境研究,1994,6(2):34-44.
[17]刘振乾,刘红玉,吕宪国.三江平原湿地生态脆弱性研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):241-244.
[18]冯学武,王弋,吴丽萍.内蒙古西部生态环境综合评价研究[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(3):322-327.
[19]贺新春，邵东国，陈南祥.地下水环境脆弱性分区研究[J].武汉大学学报:工学版,2005,38(1):73-78.
[20]方开泰.实用多元统计分析[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1989.
[21]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.
[22]雍红月,李松林.区域经济动态发展水平的全局主成分分析方法[J].内蒙古大学学报:自然科学版,2005,36(1):21-25.
[23]熊熊,张维,任达,安瑛晖. 商业银行监管、监控指标的全局主成分分析[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(1):1-5.
[24]黄淑芳.主成分分析及MAPINFO 在生态环境脆弱性评价中的应用[J].福建地理，2002，17（1）：47-49.
[25]蒲健辰.中国冰川目录Ⅷ\_\_长江水系[Z]. 兰州: 甘肃文化出版社,1994:1-81.
[26]杨建平,丁永建,陈仁升.长江黄河源区高寒植被变化的NDVI记录[J].地理学报,2005,60(3):467-478.