京津风沙源浑善达克沙地治理区退耕还林地的植被变化

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00083

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文选择京津风沙源区浑善达克沙地治理区大兴安岭南部亚区2004年退耕的榆树-小叶锦鸡儿林及山杏林和浑善达克沙地亚区2002年退耕的榆树-小叶锦鸡儿、小叶锦鸡儿退耕林及榆树疏林沙地设置监测样地,对植被盖度、生物量、物种多样性等进行了连续4年的监测调查,结果表明:在大兴安岭南部亚区,退耕后4~7年,榆树-小叶锦鸡儿林总盖度和总生物量均极显著高于对照的蒿类草地(p<0.01),且呈逐年上升趋势;山杏人工林总盖度在前期低于天然胡枝子灌丛,但后期优于对照;山杏人工林总生物量逐年增加,并在2010年和2011年显著大于胡枝子灌丛(p<0.05)。榆树-小叶锦鸡儿和山杏人工林及其对照样地的Shannon-Wiener指数均呈波状变化,差异不显著。在浑善达克沙地亚区,退耕后6~9年,榆树-小叶锦鸡儿林地的总盖度显著高于小叶锦鸡儿和榆树疏林沙地(p<0.05),但榆树疏林沙地在年际间的变化更稳定,榆树疏林沙地总生物量在2008—2010年间均高于榆树-小叶锦鸡儿和小叶锦鸡儿人工林,但人工林逐年增加的趋势更明显。小叶锦鸡儿人工林和榆树疏林沙地的Shannon-Wiener指数明显高于榆树-小叶锦鸡儿林地,并且都呈波状增加趋势,而榆树-小叶锦鸡儿林地的Shannon-Wiener指数表现出与降雨变化同样的趋势。

关键词: 京津风沙源, 浑善达克沙地, 退耕还林, 植被

Abstract:

Two kinds of typical artifical forests, converted from farmland in 2004, of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla and Prunus sibirica, located in southern Daxinganling sub-region, were selected for model, other two kinds of typical artificial forests, converted from farmland in 2002, of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla and Caragana microphylla, located at Otindag Sandy Land sub-region were also selected to investigate the effects of the converting engineering on the vegetation. Both the regions are part of Beijing-Tianjin sandstorm-control area. The vegetation coverage, biomass and species diversity had been monitored for four consecutive years. The results indicated that: In southern Daxinganling sub-region, the total vegetation coverage and total biomass of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla, after converted from farmland for four to seven years, were significantly higher than that of the Artemisia grassland, and the former showed an increasing trend by year but the later a wave-like trend with no significant difference within the four years. The artificial Prunus armeniaca coverage was lower than the natural lespedeza Shrub in the topphase, but it was superior to the control in later. The total biomass of Caragana microphylla artificial forests increased year by year and significantly greater than that of Lespedeza bicolor scrublands in 2010 and 2011. The total vegetation coverage of Caragana microphylla artificial forests was very significantly higher than that of Lespedeza bicolor in 2008, and the vegetation coverage of Lespedeza bicolor shrubland reduced significantly in the year of 2009 and 2010. The Shannon-Wiener index of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla, Prunus armeniaca and its counterpart plots showed a trend of wave-like change, and no obvious difference was found between them. In Otindag Sandy Land sub-region, after converted from farmland for six to nine years, the total vegetation coverage of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla was higher than that of the Caragana microphylla and open sandy land with sparse Ulmus pumila, and the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla forest had a more stable annual change. The total biomass of the open sandy land with sparse Ulmus pumila was higher than that of the artificial forests of Caragana microphylla and Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla during 2008-2010. The biomass of the artificial forests had a more clearer increasing trend than that of natural forest. The Shannon-Wiener index of the Caragana microphylla and Ulmus pumila forests were significantly higher than that of the Ulmus pumila-Caragana microphylla. This index showed a close relation to rainfall.

Key words: Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm-control Area, Otindag Sandy Land, forests converted from farmland, vegetation

中图分类号:

Q948

魏兴琥1, 雷俐2, 邹学勇3, 严平3, 张春来3. 京津风沙源浑善达克沙地治理区退耕还林地的植被变化[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(2): 604-612.

WEI Xing-hu1, LEI Li2, ZOU Xue-yong3, YAN Ping3, ZHANG Chun-lai3. Research on the Vegetation Changing of Artifical Forests Converted from Farmland in Otindag Sandy Land Sub-regions of Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm-control Area[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2013, 33(2): 604-612.

参考文献

[1]杨根生,董光荣,曲耀光,等.关于宁、蒙、陕农牧交错带重点地区退耕还林(草)工程实施情况与建议[J].中国沙漠,2002,22（5）:416-427.

[2]周立华,马永欢,马绍休.中国北方农牧交错带风水蚀复合区的粮食与退耕还林(草)问题[J].中国沙漠,2007,27（4）:552-557.

[3]吕荣,刘朝霞,张俊义.鄂尔多斯地区土地荒漠化防治对策[J].中国沙漠,2002,22（5）:513-515.

[4]张笑培.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区植被恢复生态效应研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008

[5]杨树,温雨金,刘鸿雁.内蒙古中部地区退耕还林还草后植被与土壤性状的变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(4):143-149.

[6]万雪琴,胡庭兴,张健,等.坡耕地退耕还林后的植被恢复[J].林业科学,2005,41（2）:191-194.

[7]杨光,孙保平,赵廷宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕还林工程植被恢复效益初步研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20（2）:165-169.

[8]杨光,丁国栋,常国梁,等.黄土高原不同退耕还林地森林植被改良土壤特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13（3）:204-207.

[9]国润才,莲花,赵玉柱.卓资县退耕还林（草）工程效益浅析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26（3）:12-16.

[10]刘朝霞,张俊义,张二生.内蒙古准格尔旗丘陵沟壑区退耕还林(草)模式[J].中国沙漠,2002,22（5）:506-509.

[11]赵雨兴,郝飞鹏,刘丽芳,等.鄂尔多斯地区退耕还林造林模式研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22（5）:499-505.

[12]杜灵通, 田庆久.宁夏植被覆盖动态变化及与气候因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1479-1485.

[13]张景光,王新平.甘宁蒙陕退耕还林(草)中的适地适树问题[J].中国沙漠,2002,22（5）:489-494.

[14]唐毅,蒋德明,陈雪峰,等.疏林草原榆树天然更新研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1226-1230.

[15]崔秀萍, 刘果厚.浑善达克沙地黄柳更新特点与规律研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(1):60-64.

[16]曹立国,刘普幸,张克新,等.锡林郭勒盟草地对气候变化的响应及其空间差异分析[J].干旱区研究,2011,28（5）:789-794.

[17]林敏,杨丽桃,林建.内蒙古地区2009年气候对牧业的影响评价[J].现代农业,2011,（5）:173-174.

[18]杨丽桃,冯月琴,王军霞.2010年全区气候回顾[J].内蒙古草业,2012,24（1）:22-24.