Temporal-spatial characteristics and dynamic decoupling process of tourism economic development and eco-environmental pressure in provinces of the Yellow River Basin

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00050

Journal of Desert Research ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 241-250.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00050

Temporal-spatial characteristics and dynamic decoupling process of tourism economic development and eco-environmental pressure in provinces of the Yellow River Basin

Xuhong Zhang¹(), Cheng Zhou²(), Yanyan Li³, Lin Zhou⁴, Minmin Ren², Yaling Zhao²

^1.School of Economic and Management，Xi'an University of Technology，Xi'an 710054，China
^2.Faculty of Culture and Tourism /, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics，Taiyuan 030006，China
^3.Faculty of International Trade, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics，Taiyuan 030006，China
^4.Tourism College，Northwest Normal University，Lanzhou 730070，China

Received:2022-04-20 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-05-20 Published:2022-06-01
Contact: Cheng Zhou

Abstract

Abstract:

There exists pressure and response correlation between regional tourism economy and eco-environment. Taking 9 provinces of the Yellow River Basin as the research unit， and 2004-2018 as the investigation period， this paper analyzes temporal-spatial characteristics of tourism economic development and eco-environmental pressure of provinces of the Yellow River Basin by using tourism economic development index， eco-environmental pressure index， and dynamic change index. The decoupling analysis model is used to dynamically study the decoupling process between tourism economy and eco-environment system. The results show that：（1） In terms of space， the development of tourism economy in the Yellow River Basin is characterized by high in the east and low in the west， high in the south and low in the north. Eco-environmental pressure has obvious differences in different reaches of the Yellow River， the upstream provinces have less eco-environment pressure， while the middle and downstream provinces have more environmental pressure and severe ecological governance. （2） In terms of time， the tourism economy of Qinghai， Gansu and Ningxia have a relatively low starting point but develop rapidly， Henan and Shandong have a relatively high starting point but little change. In addition， the change of eco-environmental pressure does not show significant spatial distribution， and Shanxi is a province with low level of eco-environmental pressure variation. （3） From the perspective of decoupling， the relationship between tourism economy and eco-environmental pressure in most provinces of the Yellow River Basin shows the trend from expansionary coupling to weak decoupling， from weak negative decoupling to strong decoupling from 2004 to 2018， and decoupling relationship tends to develop in a benign direction. Finally， the system decoupling and response strategies of tourism economy and ecological environment in the Yellow River basin are proposed from the aspects of developing ecotourism economy， paying attention to environment governance and establishing system decoupling mechanism.

Key words: tourism economic development, eco-environmental pressure, dynamic decoupling, Yellow River Basin

CLC Number:

F590.1

Xuhong Zhang, Cheng Zhou, Yanyan Li, Lin Zhou, Minmin Ren, Yaling Zhao. Temporal-spatial characteristics and dynamic decoupling process of tourism economic development and eco-environmental pressure in provinces of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 241-250.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1 Decoupling analysis system and index weight of tourism economic development and eco-environment pressure

系统	分析维度	具体指标/单位	权重	指标类型
旅游经济发展	旅游资源	3A级以上旅游景区数/处	0.098	+
		风景名胜区、地质公园、世界遗产之和/个	0.103	+
		国家级非物质文化遗产数/项	0.102	+
		艺术表演团体机构数/个	0.043	+
	经济效益	国内旅游收入/亿元	0.125	+
		入境旅游收入/万美元	0.085	+
		国内旅游人次/万人次	0.109	+
		入境旅游人次/万人次	0.043	+
	产业规模	旅游从业人数/人	0.157	+
		星级酒店数量/家	0.089	+
		旅行社数量/家	0.046	+
生态环境压力	生态资源	自然保护区面积/万hm²	0.073	-
		森林覆盖率/%	0.094	-
		人均公园绿地面积/m²	0.114	-
		人均水资源量/m³	0.055	-
	环境污染	废水排放总量/万t	0.125	+
		二氧化硫排放总量/万t	0.074	+
		烟（粉）尘排放总量/万t	0.096	+
		工业固体废物生产总量/万t	0.085	+
	环境治理	环境污染治理投资/亿元	0.055	-
		生活垃圾清运量/万t	0.057	-
		污水处理能力/万m³	0.059	-
		工业固体废物综合利用量/万t	0.068	-
		工业固体废物处置量/万t	0.045	-

Fig.1 The division standard of decoupling type between tourism economic development and eco-environment pressure

Fig.2 Spatial differences of tourism economic development in the Yellow River Basin

Fig.3 Dynamic changes of tourism economic development in the Yellow River Basin

Fig.4 Spatial differences of eco-environmental pressure in the Yellow River Basin

Fig.5 Dynamic changes of eco-environmental pressure in the Yellow River Basin

Table 2 Dynamic decoupling analysis of tourism economic development and eco-environment pressure in the Yellow River Basin

省区	T₁(2004—2012年)				T₂(2012—2018年)
省区	$? E E P I$	$? T E D I$	ε	状态	$? E E P I$	$? T E D I$	ε	状态
山西	0.0521	0.0521	1.0003	扩张性耦合	0.0141	0.6015	0.0235	弱解耦
内蒙古	-0.1083	-0.2344	0.4622	弱负解耦	0.1021	0.3243	0.3150	弱解耦
山东	0.0742	0.0530	1.3995	扩张性负解耦	0.0832	0.0902	0.9232	扩张性耦合
河南	0.0574	0.0560	1.0244	扩张性耦合	0.1298	0.6143	0.2113	弱解耦
四川	0.1133	0.1145	0.9900	扩张性耦合	0.2012	0.4327	0.4650	弱解耦
陕西	0.1364	0.3242	0.4208	弱解耦	0.0539	0.5854	0.0921	弱解耦
甘肃	0.0865	0.1051	0.8233	扩张性耦合	0.1811	0.3538	0.5118	弱解耦
青海	0.2178	-0.4255	-0.5120	强负解耦	-0.0283	1.7102	-0.0165	强解耦
宁夏	-0.1742	-0.4843	0.3598	弱负解耦	-0.0235	0.6325	-0.0372	强解耦

Table 2 Dynamic decoupling analysis of tourism economic development and eco-environment pressure in the Yellow River Basin

省区	T₁(2004—2012年)				T₂(2012—2018年)
省区	$? E E P I$	$? T E D I$	ε	状态	$? E E P I$	$? T E D I$	ε	状态
山西	0.0521	0.0521	1.0003	扩张性耦合	0.0141	0.6015	0.0235	弱解耦
内蒙古	-0.1083	-0.2344	0.4622	弱负解耦	0.1021	0.3243	0.3150	弱解耦
山东	0.0742	0.0530	1.3995	扩张性负解耦	0.0832	0.0902	0.9232	扩张性耦合
河南	0.0574	0.0560	1.0244	扩张性耦合	0.1298	0.6143	0.2113	弱解耦
四川	0.1133	0.1145	0.9900	扩张性耦合	0.2012	0.4327	0.4650	弱解耦
陕西	0.1364	0.3242	0.4208	弱解耦	0.0539	0.5854	0.0921	弱解耦
甘肃	0.0865	0.1051	0.8233	扩张性耦合	0.1811	0.3538	0.5118	弱解耦
青海	0.2178	-0.4255	-0.5120	强负解耦	-0.0283	1.7102	-0.0165	强解耦
宁夏	-0.1742	-0.4843	0.3598	弱负解耦	-0.0235	0.6325	-0.0372	强解耦

References 45

1	王胜鹏，乔花芳，冯娟，等.黄河流域旅游生态效率时空演化及其与旅游经济互动响应［J］.经济地理，2020，40（5）：81-89.
2	李小建，文玉钊，李元征，等.黄河流域高质量发展：人地协调与空间协调［J］.经济地理，2020，40（4）：1-10.
3	习近平.在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话［J］.实践（思想理论版），2019（11）：5-9.
4	李冬花，张晓瑶，陆林，等.黄河流域高级别旅游景区空间分布特征及影响因素［J］.经济地理，2020，40（5）：70-80.
5	汤姿，石长波，张娜.黑龙江省旅游经济与生态环境时空耦合研究：基于“坚持人与自然和谐共生”的视角［J］.商业研究，2018（1）：1-9.
6	刘遗志，胡争艳.基于PSR模型的旅游发展与生态环境耦合协调研究：基于虢州省实证分析［J］.生态经济，2020，36（3）：132-136.
7	L J Smith Stephen，吴必虎.游憩地理学：理论与方法［M］.北京：高等教育出版社，1992：157-158.
8	贾巨才，孔伟，任亮.京津冀协同发展背景下冀西北地区旅游经济与生态环境协调发展研究［J］.中国农业资源与区划，2019，40（2）：167-173.
9	林小语，白中东，邱瑛.三亚市海洋旅游经济的生态环境影响与对策探索［J］.产业与科技论坛，2016，15（5）：18-19.
10	Dubois G， Peeters P， Ceron J P，et al.The future tourism mobility of the world population： emission growth versus climate policy［J］.Transportation Research Part A：Policy and Practice，2011，45（10）：1031-1042.
11	Lindberg K J， K.Sproule Enriquez.Ecotourism questioned：case studies from Belize［J］.Annals of Tourism Research，1996，23（3）：543-562.
12	Joseph E， Mbaiwa J.The social-economic and environmental impacts of tourism，development on Okavango Delta，North-Western Bostswana［J］.Journal of Arid Environments，2003（54）：447-476.
13	Doenhoff M J， Elfaham M， Liddell S，et al.Cross-reactivity between schistosomamansoni antigens and the latex allergen hev b7：putative implication of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants （CCDs）［J］.PloS One，2016，11（7）：223-226.
14	杨莎莎，秦艳辉，邓闻静，等.中国十大城市群旅游经济与生态环境耦合关系的比较［J］.统计与决策，2017，490（22）：131-134.
15	邹卒.乡村振兴背景下旅游经济的发展对生态环境的影响分析：以重庆市为例［J］.林业经济，2019，41（6）：72-76.
16	刘德光，屈小爽.中国旅游经济与生态环境协调发展度测算及区域差异分析［J］.广东财经大学学报，2016，147（4）：89-96.
17	吕志强，庞荣，代富强.近10年来我国旅游产业与旅游环境协调度的时空演化分析［J］.资源开发与市场，2015（5）：634-637.
18	高靓，张杜娟.陕西省生态环境与旅游经济耦合协调发展研究［J］.山西师范大学学报（自然科学版），2020，34（2）：38-43.
19	韩丽红，潘玉君，杨冬琪.云南省旅游经济与生态环境协调发展研究［J］.中州大学学报，2020，37（3）：33-37.
20	王新民，宋泽华.天水市旅游经济与生态环境融合发展研究［J］.安徽农业科学，2020，48（10）：54-57.
21	Gelsoa B R， Peterson J M.The Influence of ethical attitudes on the demand for environmental recreation：incorporating lexicographic preferences［J］.Ecological Economics，2005，53（1）：35-45.
22	Bestard A B， Rossell N J.Modelling environmental attitudes toward tourism［J］.Tourism Management，2007，28（3）：688-695.
23	Roca E， Villares M， Ortego M I.Assessing public perceptions on beach quality according to beach users profile：a case study in the coastal Brava［J］.Tourism Management，2009，30（4）：598-607.
24	郭向阳，穆学青，丁正山，等.城市生态环境与旅游经济协调效应及动态关系：以曲靖为例［J］.经济地理，2020，40（7）：231-240.
25	Altorki S.Milk-Kinship in arab society：an unexplored problem in the ethnography of marriage［J］.Ethnology，1980，19（2）：233-244.
26	石惠春，刘鹿，汪宝龙，等.兰州市旅游经济与城市生态环境协调发展研究［J］.西北师范大学学报（自然科学版），2012，48（4）：108-114.
27	张广海，刘真真，王新越.中国沿海区域旅游化与生态环境耦合度分析及预测［J］.生态环境学报，2013，22（5）：792-800.
28	周成，冯学钢，唐睿.区域经济-生态环境-旅游产业耦合协调发展分析与预测：以长江经济带沿线各省市为例［J］.经济地理，2016，36（3）：186-193.
29	郭莎莎，陈明星，刘慧.城镇化与资源环境的耦合过程与解耦分析：以北京为例［J］.地理研究，2018，37（8）：1599-1608.
30	Tapio P.Towards a theory of decoupling： degrees of decoupling in the eu and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001［J］.Transport Policy，2008，12（2）：137-151.
31	黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展规划纲要［N］.人民日报，2021-10-09（01）.
32	马勇，李丽霞，任洁.神农架林区旅游经济-交通状况-生态环境协调发展研究［J］.经济地理，2017，37（10）：215-220.
33	李永平.旅游产业、区域经济与生态环境协调发展研究［J］.经济问题，2020（8）：122-129.
34	吴传清，周西一敏.长江经济带绿色经济效率的时空格局演变及其影响因素研究［J］.宏观质量研究，2020，8（3）：120-128.
35	马艳.长江经济带城镇化与生态环境耦合协调效应测度与交互胁迫关系验证［J］.长江流域资源与环境，2020，29（2）：275-286.
36	曾刚，石庆玲，王丰龙.长江经济带城市生态保护能力格局与提升策略初探［J］.华中师范大学学报（自然科学版），2020，54（4）：503-510.
37	汪芳，安黎哲，党安荣，等.黄河流域人地耦合与可持续人居环境［J］.地理研究，2020，39（8）：1707-1724.
38	刘志博，郝钟，张海英，等.黄河流域省域生态文明建设评价初探［J］.环境保护，2020，48（17）：49-54.
39	张达.长江经济带中心城市人居环境与经济发展协调度差异及影响因素研究［J］.西南大学学报（自然科学版），2020，42（6）：79-88.
40	周成，张旭红，张倩，等.黄河流域“五位一体”综合评价体系建构与空间差异研究［J］.中国沙漠，2021，41（4）：1-11.
41	夏会娟，孔维静，孙建新，等.基于MODIS NDVI的辽河保护区成立前后植被覆盖时空动态研究［J］.生态学报，2018，38（15）：5434-5442.
42	李善同，王寅初.部门价格变动与通货膨胀：多部门动态模型分析［J］.数量经济技术经济研究，1996（10）：8-18.
43	周成，冯学钢，张旭红.中国旅游科技创新的时空结构、重心轨迹及其影响因素研究［J］.世界地理研究，2022，31（2）：418-427.
44	吴昊玥，黄瀚蛟，陈文宽.中国粮食主产区耕地利用碳排放与粮食生产脱钩效应研究［J］.地理与地理信息科学，2021，37（6）：85-91.
45	张华明，元鹏飞，朱治双.黄河流域碳排放脱钩效应及减排路径［J］.资源科学，2022，44（1）：59-69.

[1]	Jiajia Chen, Yanan Zheng, Weilan Zhang, Xiaoqin Zhang. Spatial-temporal evolution of coupling coordination degree between industrial greening and ecological environment greening in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 1-10.
[2]	Wanyun Luo, Fubo Wang, Hui Sun. Spatial pattern evolution characteristics of high-quality green development level in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(3): 11-20.
[3]	Cheng Zhou, Binghua Liu, Xuhong Zhang, Juan Tian, Lin Zhou. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of heritage conservation units in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 10-20.
[4]	Zhiwei Ding, Rui Zhao, Zihan Jian, Yiwei Meng, Gaisu Zhang. Economics spatial pattern and its influencing factors of Yellow River Basin at town scale from the perspective of urban-rural integration [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 195-204.
[5]	Juan Wang, Huijuan He, Jinfang Dong, Bin Guo. Spatio-temporal distribution of vegetation net primary productivity in the Yellow River Basin in 2000-2019 and its natural driving factors [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 213-222.
[6]	Pan Yang, Wei Liang, Jianwu Yan, Siya Li, Zhiyang Lan. Multi-scale analysis of water system structure changes in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 223-234.
[7]	Haijin Shi, Wenheng Wu, Yan Li, Jinfeng Liu, Yun Wan. Study on spatial expansion and dynamic factors of built-up area of central cities in the Yellow River Basin based on night-time light data [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 235-248.
[8]	Jie Yang, Baopeng Xie, Degang Zhang. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-off synergy in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(6): 78-87.
[9]	Cheng Zhou, Xuhong Zhang, Qian Zhang, Binghua Liu. The construction of "Five in One" comprehensive evaluation system and spatial difference in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 1-11.
[10]	Jie Yang, Baopeng Xie, Degang Zhang. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin based on InVEST model and GeoDetector [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 12-22.
[11]	Man Sun, Tao Song. Spatio-temporal patterns and coordinated development of technological innovation and industrial development in the Yellow River Basin of Gansu Province， China [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 140-151.
[12]	Mengtao Han, Jianjun Tu, Guiping Xu, Li Jiang. Spatio-temporal coordination between aquatic ecosystem services and economic development in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 167-176.
[13]	Guangqin Li, Xubing Fang. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of green development level in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 129-139.
[14]	Gaopeng Sun, Xianfeng Liu, Xiaohong Wang, Shuangshuang Li. Changes in vegetation coverage and its influencing factors across the Yellow River Basin during 2001-2020 [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 205-212.
[15]	Youheng Wang, Dan Tan, Lanying Han, Danhua Li, xin Wang, Guoyang Lu, Jingjing Lin. Review of climate change in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(4): 235-246.

Temporal-spatial characteristics and dynamic decoupling process of tourism economic development and eco-environmental pressure in provinces of the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 45

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments