腾格里沙漠东南缘不同生境油蒿种群的数量动态

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00173

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对腾格里沙漠东南缘不同的生境条件（包括始建于1964年的人工植被区和天然植被区）下油蒿（Artemisia ordosica）种群调查取样，按照植株的体积大小分为7个龄级（Ⅰ，0~2 cm³；Ⅱ，2~5 cm³；Ⅲ，5~10 cm³；Ⅳ，10~15 cm³；Ⅴ，15~20 cm³；Ⅵ，20~30 cm³；Ⅶ，>30 cm³），分析了种群的组成、静态生命表和存活曲线。结果表明：人工植被区油蒿种群的总体规模大于天然植被区，幼龄个体占有很高的比例；天然植被区油蒿的死亡率低于人工植被区，天然植被区Ⅰ和Ⅱ龄级油蒿种群的死亡率最高，人工植被区Ⅴ~Ⅶ龄级的油蒿种群死亡率最高；天然植被区油蒿种群的稳定性维持主要通过幼苗的更新，而人工植被区可通过幼苗的自我更新和大龄植株的自疏作用；Ⅴ龄级的油蒿个体是种群中的生存质量最佳的个体；两种生境下油蒿种群均符合Deevey Ⅱ型存活曲线。

关键词: 油蒿(Artemisia.ordosica), 种群生命表, 存活曲线, 腾格里沙漠

Abstract: In this paper, we sampling surveyed on the Artemisia ordosica population under different habitats (include artificial vegetation area established from 1964 and natural vegetation area) in southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert. The A.ordosica population was divided into seven age-class according to the volume level. We analyzed the composition of population, static life table and survival curve. We developed the following conclusions:(1) The overall size of the A.ordosica population in artificial vegetation area is larger than in natural vegetation area. High proportion of A.ordosica population is young individuals in two habitats. (2) The death rate of A.ordosica population in natural vegetation area is lower than in artificial vegetation area. The age-class Ⅰ and Ⅱ of A.ordosica population in natural vegetation area have the highest death rate and the age-class from Ⅴ to Ⅶ in artificial vegetation area have the highest death rate. (3) The stability maintenance of A.ordosica population in natural vegetation area is mainly through seedling regeneration. In artificial vegetation area, the stability maintenance through seedling regeneration and self-thinning effect of older individuals. (4) The age-class Ⅴ of the A.ordosica individuals have best quality of life in population. (5) The population survival curves in different two habitats were close to Deevey-Ⅱtype.

Key words: Artemisia ordosica, life table, survival curve, Tengger Desert

中图分类号:

Q145+.1

张定海, 杨丽萍, 张志山. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同生境油蒿种群的数量动态[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(5): 893-901.

Zhang Dinghai, Yang Liping, Zhang Zhishan. Numeric Dynamics of Artemisia ordosica Population under Different Habitats in Southeastern Edge of the Tengger Desert[J]. JOURNAL OF DESERT RESEARCH, 2017, 37(5): 893-901.

参考文献

[1] Obiang N L E,Ngomand A A,Hymas O,et al.Diagnosing the demographic balance of two light-demanding tree species populations in central Africa from their diameter distribution[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2014,313(2):55-62.
[2] Helm C V,Witkowski E T F.Characterising wide spatial variation in population size structure of a keystone African savanna tree[J].Fuel & Energy Abstracts,2012,263(1):175-188.
[3] Gerhardt K,Todd C.Natural regeneration and population dynamics of the tree Afzelia quanzensis in woodlands in Southern Africa[J].African Journal of Ecology,2009,47(4):583-591.
[4] Mwavu E N,Witkowski E T F.Population structure and regeneration of multiple-use tree species in a semi-deciduous African tropical rainforest:implications for primate conservation[J].Forest Ecology & Management,2009,258(5):840-849.
[5] Harcombe P A.Tree life tables[J].Bioscience,1987,37(8):557-568.
[6] 王卓,黄荣凤,王林和,et al.毛乌素沙地天然臭柏种群生命表分析[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(1):118-124.
[7] D¡az S,Mercado C,Alvarez-Cardenas S.Structure and population dynamics of Pinus lagunae M.-F.Passini[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2000,134(1):249-256.
[8] 周纪纶.植物种群生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1992:40-80.
[9] 于云江,林庆功,郜永贵,等.从植被演替和抗风性研究包兰线沙坡头段人工植被稳定性[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(1):63-70.
[10] 刘媖心,李玉俊,杨喜林.沙生植物的根系.流沙治理(二)[M].银川:宁夏人民出版社,1991:20-80.
[11] 张强.油蒿群落更新的研究[J].生态学杂志,1983,2:14-19.
[12] 于晓娜,李恩贵,黄永梅,等.毛乌素沙地油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)群落土壤水分动态特征[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(3):674-682.
[13] 王庆锁,董学军,陈旭东,等.油蒿群落不同演替阶段某些群落特征的研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(6):531-538.
[14] 丘明新.油蒿植物群落与固沙造林关系的研究——兼论用该群落在沙坡头建立人工植被的可能性[J].西北植物学报,1984,4(1):29-39.
[15] 王立群,陈世璜,郝利忠.黑沙蒿生态生物学特性及群落地理分布规律相关性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16(4):95-98.
[16] 邱国玉,石庆辉.沙坡头人工植被组成分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,1991(1):22-32.
[17] 郭柯,刘志茂.毛乌素沙地沙丘土壤含水量特点——兼论老固定沙地上油蒿衰退原因[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(3):275-279.
[18] 中国科学院兰州沙漠研究所沙坡头沙漠科学研究站.包兰铁路沙坡头段固沙原理与措施[M].银川:宁夏人民出版社,1991:30-90.
[19] 李鸣冈,刘媖心,刘中民.包兰铁路中卫段腾格里沙漠地区铁路沿线固沙造林的研究[M]//林业集刊,第三号.北京,1960:1-80.
[20] 肖洪浪,李新荣,段争虎,等.流沙固定过程中土壤-植被系统演变对水环境的影响[J].土壤学报,2003,40(6):809-814.
[21] Li X R,Xiao H L,Zhang J G,et al.Long-term ecosystem effects of sand-binding vegetation in the Tengger Desert,Northern China[J].Restoration Ecology,2004,12(3):376-390.
[22] 沈渭寿.油蒿在沙坡头地区沙地植被演替中的地位[J].中国沙漠,1986,6(4):13-22.
[23] Li X R,Jia X H,Long L Q,et al.Effects of biological soil crusts on seed bank,germination and establishment of two annual plant species in the Tengger Desert (N China) (SCI)[J].Plant & Soil,2005,277(1/2):375-385.
[24] 李新荣,张志山,王新平,等.干旱区土壤-植被系统恢复的生态水文学研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(5):845-852.
[25] 李新荣,张志山,谭会娟,等.我国北方风沙危害区生态重建与恢复:腾格里沙漠土壤水分与植被承载力的探讨[J].中国科学:生命科学,2014,44(3):257-266.
[26] 杨航宇,刘艳梅,王延璞.荒漠区生物土壤结皮对土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):654-663.
[27] 张婕,上官铁梁,段毅豪,等.灵空山辽东栎种群年龄结构与动态[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(11):3125-3130.
[28] 马凤云,李新荣,龙利群,等.沙坡头地区人工植被油蒿种群结构与更新的研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(6):571-575.
[29] 杨昊天,李新荣,刘立超,等.荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1340-1348.
[30] 刘玉平,苏慧,刘贵峰,等.罕山自然保护区森林植物群落优势种的种群结构与动态[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(4):170-175.
[31] 段桂芳,单立山,李毅,等.甘肃中西部地区红砂种群结构及空间格局特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):67-74.
[32] 石亚飞,张志山,黄磊,等.古尔班通古特沙漠半固定沙丘植物群落物种组成和种群结构[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1024-1030.
[33] 董鸣.缙云山马尾松种群年龄结构初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1987(1):50-58.
[34] 郭全邦,刘玉成.缙云山森林次生演替序列优势种群的生态位[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,1997,22(1):73-78.
[35] 刘树敏,杨九艳,清华,等.内蒙古荒漠区红砂(Reaumuria soongorica)种群格局[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(5):1331-1339.