柠条(Caragana korshinskii)、油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)、花棒(Hedysarum scoparium)叶片吸水潜力及影响因素

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2019.00111

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 叶片吸水是干旱荒漠人工植被区植物利用小量级降水的主要方式,对缓解植物干旱胁迫具有重要的生态水文学意义。测定了腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被区1956、1964、1981年栽植的柠条(Caragana korshinskii)、油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)和花棒(Hedysarum scoparium)叶片单位面积吸水量(LWUC)、叶片含水量增加率(R_w)、叶片水分饱和亏(WSD)、比叶面积(SLA)和叶片干物质含量(LDMC),并分析了它们与叶片水势、净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度及浅层、深层土壤水分之间的关系。结果表明:柠条、油蒿、花棒的叶片均具有吸收水分的能力,吸水量油蒿>花棒>柠条,LWUC分别为0.249~1.879、0.429~10.009、0.051~4.955 mg·cm^-2。LWUC最适合表征植物吸水能力的性状,柠条的LWUC与R_w、LDMC极显著正相关(P<0.01),与SLA显著正相关(P<0.05);油蒿的LWUC与R_w、WSD极显著正相关(P<0.01);花棒的LWUC与R_w、WSD极显著正相关(P<0.01),与SLA显著负相关(P<0\^05)。柠条和油蒿的叶片单位面积吸水量主要受叶片水势的影响,而花棒则受叶片水势和WUE的共同影响,但在不同年代的人工植被区,浅层土壤水分均为主要影响因子。

关键词: 荒漠植物, 叶片吸水潜力, 腾格里沙漠, 人工植被

Abstract: The foliar water uptake is the main way for plants to use small-scale precipitation in desert revegetated areas, which has important ecological hydrological significance for alleviating drought. The foliar water uptake potential of Caragana korshinskii, Artemisia ordosica and Hedysarum scoparium planted in a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert in 1956, 1964 and 1981 was studied. The leaf water uptake content (LWUC), percentage increase in leaf water content (R_w), leaf water saturation deficit (WSD), specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry material content (LDMC) of three typical sand fixing plants were measured, and analyzed its relationship with leaf water potential, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and shallow and deep soil moisture content. The results showed that the leaves of three typical plants had the capacity of the water uptake. The capacity of the water uptake was: A. ordosica > H. scoparium > C. korshinskii. The LWUC of C. korshinskii, A. ordosica and H. scoparium ranged from 0.249-1.879, 0.429-10.009 and 0.051-4.955 mg·cm^-2. LWUC is most suitable for characterizing the capacity of water uptake. LWUC and R_w decreased with the increase of planting vegetation years, while WSD, SLA and LDMC did not change significantly. LWUC was significantly positively correlated with R_w and LDMC of C. korshinskii (P<0.01), and was positively correlated with SLA (P<0.05); LWUC was significantly positively correlated with R_w and WSD of A. ordosica (P<0.01); LWUC was significantly positively correlated with R_w and WSD of H. scoparium (P<0.01), and was negatively correlated with SLA (P<0.05). In general, LWUC of C. korshinskii and A. ordosica is mainly affected by water potential, respectively, and LWUC of H. scoparium is mainly affected by water potential and WUE. The most important influencing factors of different revegetated areas is shallow soil moisture content. The results of the study will deepen our understanding of the strategies for the use of water resources in desert revegetated areas.

Key words: desert plants, foliar water uptake, the Tengger Desert, revegetated

中图分类号:

Q945.79

杨利贞, 冯丽, 杨贵森, 黄磊. 柠条(Caragana korshinskii)、油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)、花棒(Hedysarum scoparium)叶片吸水潜力及影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(2): 214-221.

Yang Lizhen, Feng Li, Yang Guisen, Huang Lei. Water absorption potential and influencing factors of leaf in Caragana korshinskii, Artemisia ordosica, Hedysarum scoparium in a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(2): 214-221.

参考文献

[1] Limm E B,Dawson T E.Polystichum munitum (Dryopteridaceae) varies geographically in its capacity to absorb fog water by foliar uptake within the redwood forest ecosystem[J].American Journal of Botany,2010,97 (7):1121-1128.
[2] Evaristo J,Mcdonnell J J.Prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation:a global stable isotope meta-analysis[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7:44110.
[3] Goldsmith G R,Matzke N J,Dawson T E.The incidence and implications of clouds for cloud forest plant water relations[J].Ecology Letters,2013,16(3):307-314.
[4] Dawson T E.Fog in the California redwood forest:ecosystem inputs and use by plants[J].Oecologia,1998,117(4):476-485.
[5] Munné-Bosch S.Direct foliar absorption of rainfall water and its biological significance in dryland ecosystems[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2010,74(3):1-4.
[6] Burgess S S O,Dawson T E.The contribution of fog to the water relations of Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don):foliar uptake and prevention of dehydration[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2004,27(8):1023-1034.
[7] Breshears D D,McDowell N G,Goddard K L,et al.Foliar absorption of intercepted rainfall improves woody plant water status most during drought[J].Ecology,2008,89(1):41-47.
[8] Oliveira R S,Eller C B,Bittencourt P R L,et al.The hydroclimatic and ecophysiological basis of cloud forest distributions under current and projected climates[J].Annals Journal of Botany,2014,113:909-920
[9] Munné-Bosch S,Nogués S,Alegre L.Diurnal variations of photosynthesis and dew absorption by leaves in two evergreen shrubs growing in Mediterranean field conditions[J].New Phytologist,1999,144:109-119.
[10] Eller C B,Lima A L,Oliveira R S.Foliar uptake of fog water and transport belowground alleviates drought effects in the cloud forest tree species,Drimys brasiliensis (Winteraceae)[J].New Phytologist,2013,199:151-162.
[11] 郑玉龙,冯玉龙.西双版纳地区附生与非附生植物叶片对雾水的吸收[J].应用生态学报,2006(6):977-981.
[12] Pan Z,Pitt W G,Zhang Y,et al.The upside-down water collection system of Syntrichia caninervis[J].Nature Plants,2016,2(7):16076.
[13] 郑新军,李嵩,李彦.准噶尔盆地荒漠植物的叶片水分吸收策略[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(9):893-905.
[14] Simonin K A,Santiago L S,Dawson T E.Fog interception by Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) crowns decouples physiology from soil water deficit[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2009,32(7):882-892.
[15] Johnstone J A,Dawson T E.Climatic context and ecological implications of summer fog decline in the coast redwood region[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(10):4533-4538.
[16] Berry Z C,White J C,Smith W K.Foliar uptake,carbon fluxes and water status are affected by the timing of daily fog in saplings from a threatened cloud forest[J].Tree Physiology,2014,34(5):459-470.
[17] Huang L,Zhang Z S.Effect of rainfall pulses on plant growth and transpiration of two xerophytic shrubs in a revegetated desert area:Tengger Desert,China[J].Catena,2016,137:269-276.
[18] 潘颜霞,王新平,张亚峰,等.沙坡头地区地形对凝结水形成特征的影响[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(1):118-124.
[19] 潘颜霞,王新平,张亚峰,等.沙坡头地区吸湿凝结水对生物土壤结皮的生态作用[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):653-658.
[20] Limm E B,Simonin K A,Dawson T E.Foliar water uptake:a common water acquisition strategy for plants of the redwood forest[J].Oecologia,2009,161(3):449-459.
[21] 庄艳丽,赵文智.凝结水对温带荒漠一年生植物生态作用研究[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(4):526-532.
[22] 庄艳丽,赵文智.荒漠植物雾冰藜和沙米叶片对凝结水响应的模拟实验[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(5):1068-1074.
[23] Franke W.Mechanisms of foliar penetration of solutions[J].Annual Review of Plant Biology,2003,18(18):281-300.
[24] Yates D,Hutley L.Foliar uptake of water by wet leaves of Sloanea woollsii,an Australian subtropical rainforest tree[J].Australian Journal of Botany,1995,43:157-167.
[25] 刘玉冰,李新荣,李蒙蒙,等.中国干旱半干旱区荒漠植物叶片(或同化枝)表皮微形态特征[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(11):1189-1207.
[26] 白岗栓,沙磊,李晶晶,等.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区苹果叶片的吸水能力[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):92-95.
[27] 李晶晶,白岗栓,张蕊.陕北丘陵沟壑区常见树种叶片的吸水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(1):99-102.
[28] 李善家,苏培玺,张海娜,等.荒漠植物叶片水分和功能性状特征及其相互关系[J].植物生理学报,2013,49(2):153-160.
[29] Eller C B,Lima A L,Oliveira R S.Cloud forest trees with higher foliar water uptake capacity and anisohydric behavior are more vulnerable to drought and climate change[J].New Phytologist,2016,211:489-501.
[30] 潘瑞炽.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:16-20.
[31] 赵红洋,李玉霖,王新源,等.科尔沁沙地52种植物叶片性状变异特征研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(6):1292-1298.
[32] 黄磊,张志山,陈永乐.干旱人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态随机模拟[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):568-573.
[33] Bao J T,Wang J,Li X R,et al.Age-related changes in photosynthesis and water relations of revegetated Caragana korshinskii in the Tengger desert,Northern China[J].Trees,2015,29(6):1749-1760.
[34] Franco A C,Soyza A G,Virginia R A,et al.Effects of plant size and water relations on gas exchange and growth of the desert shrub Larrea tridentate[J].Oecologia,1994,97(2):171-178.
[35] 侍瑞,苏培玺,周紫鹃,等.高寒植物群落优势种光合日变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(4):46-53.
[36] Brodribb T J,Feild T S.Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity:evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2000,23(12):1381-1388.