img

官方微信

高级检索

中国沙漠 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 195-208.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2026.00045

• • 上一篇    

新月形沙丘在与线形沙丘共生区和单一类型区的形态及风况对比

武怡霏(), 吕萍(), 余军林, 王欣瑶, 韦弈辰   

  1. 陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-22 修回日期:2026-03-18 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 吕萍
  • 作者简介:武怡霏(2001—),女,陕西西安人,硕士研究生,研究方向为风沙地貌学。E-mail: wuyifei0115@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42271006)

Comparative study on the morphology and wind regime of barchan dunes in coexisting regions with linear dunes and single-type regions

Yifei Wu(), Ping Lü(), Junlin Yu, Xinyao Wang, Yichen Wei   

  1. School of Geography and Tourism,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,China
  • Received:2026-01-22 Revised:2026-03-18 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-06-11
  • Contact: Ping Lü

摘要:

中国以及世界其他沙漠新月形沙丘与线形沙丘的共生现象较普遍,以往的研究集中在新月形沙丘与线形沙丘共生区域(共生区)或单一新月形沙丘分布区(典型区),但缺乏对这两类区域的系统对比研究,难以全面揭示不同环境下新月形沙丘的演变规律。本研究以中国12个共生区与7个典型区内的新月形沙丘为研究对象,基于Google Earth高清影像和ERA5再分析数据分析沙丘的形态和发育风况。结果表明:(1)两类区域内沙丘形态存在明显差异。共生区内新月形沙丘尺度更小且形态更胖,胖型沙丘占比超过50%,苗条型最少;典型区沙丘正常型居多,其他形态占比差异不大。(2)两类区域内风况特征存在明显差异。共生区与典型区均处于低风能环境,但共生区输沙势、平均风速更大、起沙风风向更复杂、风向变率范围更广,对应风况类型主要为钝双峰和宽单峰。(3)共生区与典型区内沙丘形态差异受风向变率和下垫面盐分胶结作用影响较大。此外,沙源分配可能也是造成共生区沙丘尺寸较小的因素之一。针对共生区与典型区沙丘形态与风况特征的对比研究,进一步弄清不同区域内新月形沙丘形态与发育环境之间的关系,为今后风沙地貌的数值模拟提供帮助。

关键词: 新月形沙丘, 沙丘共生, 沙丘形态, 风况

Abstract:

The coexistence of barchan and linear dunes is common in deserts across China and elsewhere. Previous studies have largely focused on either areas where both dune types coexist (coexisting regions) or regions dominated solely by barchan dunes (typical regions). However, a systematic comparison between these two landscape types is lacking, hindering a comprehensive understanding of barchan dune evolution under contrasting environmental settings. Here, we investigate barchan dunes from 12 coexisting regions and 7 typical regions in China. We analyzed dune morphology and the associated wind regimes using high-resolution Google Earth imagery and ERA5 reanalysis data. Our results reveal that: (1) Barchan morphology differs significantly between the two region types. In coexisting regions, dunes are smaller and plumper, with "plump" barchans accounting for over 50% of the population and "slender" forms being the least common. In contrast, typical regions are dominated by "normal" shaped barchans, with the proportions of other morphological types showing only minor differences. (2) The wind regimes also differ markedly. Although both regions are classified as low wind energy environments, coexisting regions exhibit higher drift potential, higher mean wind speed, greater directional variability of sand-moving winds, and a wider range of wind direction variability. The corresponding wind regimes are primarily obtuse bimodal and wide unimodal types. (3) These morphological differences are strongly influenced by wind direction variability and substrate salt cementation. Additionally, the partitioning of sand availability between dune types may also contribute to the smaller dune size observed in coexisting regions. This comparative study of dune morphology and wind regime characteristics refines our understanding of the relationship between barchan dune morphometry and its developmental environment, providing a foundation for future numerical simulations of aeolian landforms.

Key words: barchan dune, dune coexistence, dune morphology, wind regime

中图分类号: